@izzythepush,
izzythepush wrote:
My daughter very much thinks for herself.
Salesmanship will prevail.
If I got another dog (not at all likely), there 's a good chance
that I 'd have a GPS system subcutaneously installed in him; that 's popular.
( I really
hated, going out looking for him, when he got lost.)
Parents will
passionately want to get back lost kids or kidnapped ones.
Its only a question of time b4 movements will arise to have Low Jack
installed by obstetricians
WITHOUT even asking the parents, becoming
required by law,
in the same spirit of mandatory seatbelt use laws. Opponents to the surveillance philosophy
will be deemed
"irresponsible" and emotional examples will be adduced in support
of government being continually reported the exact place on the globe of each citizen 24/7/365.
Thay will inevitably be improved with
medical telemetry to radio alarms of strokes
and of heart attacks and of orgasms (and with
WHOM) to government; confirmatory paperwork
from the citizen, to follow. Ideal
criteria will be established; maybe in your country called: "Royal Criteria".
Survivors of government ambulance rescues from such emergencies will be poetically effusive
in
PUBLIC expressions of their gratitude, eagerly supported by their parents, wives, children & creditors.
Individualism will fall into disrepute; personal liberty (or privacy)
will be deemed re-calcitrant,
unpatriotic &
prima facie evidence of stupidity.
After privacy & personal liberty have been discredited n rejected,
questions inevitably will arise concerning what
magnitude, what
DEGREE, of
infraction will be tolerated,
or what government
rules will call down upon the citizen either a SWAT Team,
or
merely a memo in the mail noting that infraction (e.g., the person's speed along a road,
or his blood alcohol level while dining or whatever he chose to smoke) and imposing a fine, or community service.
While all this is being monitored (presumably by computer), how about the spoken word?
What if that citizen is planning to be violent, for any reason? Rebellion? Disloyalty?
izzythepush wrote:With all this Borg talk I think you're being alarmist.
I remember that word.
In the summer of 1962, John Kennedy accused Sen. Capehart of Indiana
of being
"an alarmist" when the Senator announced that
the communists were installing nuclear missles in Cuba.
Kennedy saved that for his
October surprize to successfully
influence the results of the Congressional Elections of 1962.
(Then he took out anti-communist American missles from Turkey,
in exchange for the
Reds taking theirs out of Cuba.
I don't believe that he ever apologized to Sen. Capeheart.
Woud that failure be considered
rude or dishonest, in England, Izzy???)
izzythepush wrote:
I can't see it ever happening.
To your knowledge,
has there ever been a means of surveillance invented
that government has
NOT employed upon its population ?
Is there
ANY political movement (other than ordinary libertarianism)
which resists government intrusion and oppression after government offers
a really neat, sweet, nifty
ATTRACTIVE set of justifications, using words like "unity" ?
Is
ANYONE pushing back in the
opposite direction,
in support of personal freedom?????????
This Republic was founded upon the concept that
Sovereignty was in the Individual Citizen,
not in the object of his creation: government, which had only a few delegated powers,
tossed to it by its politically stingy owners and creators.
It was then clear that
IT worked for
us;
WE did
not work for
IT.
Is
ANYONE but me pointing out
that 1. personal liberty and 2. jurisdiction of government are
INVERSELY PROPORTIONAL ?????
Will those concepts be lost in time (or lack of interest??) and reversed ?
The worst danger that I can imagine in this regard
is medical discovery of means of arresting or of reversing the aging of human body cells.
Our refuge, our haven, has been natural age-based human death.
What if that is delayed, in these circumstances ????????
Will Ike and Patton come running to the rescue again ?
Do u think the Mayans will save us on Dec. 21st, Izzy ?