1
   

Inventing The "Clinton Recession"

 
 
Reply Thu 26 Feb, 2004 10:05 am
By Michael J. Mandel Businessweek 2/23/04

The CEA's Economic Report of the President, released Feb. 9, unilaterally changed the start date of the last recession to benefit Bush's reelection bid. Instead of using the accepted start date of March, 2001, the CEA announced that the recession really started in the fourth quarter of 2000 -- a shift that would make it much more credible for the Bush Administration to term it the "Clinton Recession."

… his decision to fiddle with economic convention can't be seen as anything less than manipulation in an election year. In his press conference, Mankiw justified his decision by saying, correctly, that the NBER panel was already considering moving the recession start date forward. Some key data that the NBER watch -- including industrial production and inflation-adjusted business sales -- peaked in mid-2000. On the other hand, the latest revisions from the Bureau of Labor Statistics shifted the peak of nonfarm employment slightly later, from February to March, 2001. That's important, because the recessions of 1981-82 and 1990-91 both started in or after the month that employment fell.

Link to Businessweek

Cooking hamburgers at McDonalds is also manufacturing.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 738 • Replies: 6
No top replies

 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Feb, 2004 01:20 pm
No surprise. This administration has mastered the art of deception and revision.
They may not always be right but they are never wrong. After all God is in our presidents corner and constantly whispering in his ear.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Feb, 2004 01:44 pm
There is a pattern emerging. The Bush administration seems intent of redefining reality (categories of knowledge about the world) for it's own political advantage. We have seen it in foreign affaires (WMD) science (global warming etc) manufacturing (hamburgers are an industry) and now economics. If they encounter a fact they do not like, they redefine the category that fact is placed it. Increasingly they are living in a reality of their own invention, and that is dangerous.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Feb, 2004 01:48 pm
Not cooking hamburgers, but the construction of a properly built finished product. :wink:
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Feb, 2004 02:04 pm
McGentrix

What would you call this presidency. Come to think of it-it must be a manufacturing job since they fabricate the "truth"
0 Replies
 
Fedral
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Feb, 2004 05:14 pm
So let me get this straight.

President Bush took the oath of office on Jan 20, 2001 and in March of 2001, even before the last his moving boxes had been unpacked, a recession began and you are blaming HIM?

Or to quote your own article:
To be fair, even if the latest recession did begin after Bush took office in January, 2001, no one can say he caused it.

I think you need to look to the man who's policies actually CAUSED the recession in the first place, former President William Jefferson Clinton.
0 Replies
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Thu 26 Feb, 2004 08:04 pm
Your missing and making the article's point Fedral. The issue manipulating supposedly apolitical government data for political purposes.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Inventing The "Clinton Recession"
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 11/05/2024 at 07:57:44