be of a reader. How can this sentence be right?

I don't think "could be accurate" is sensible.

It's sneaky though. It seeks to make a particular impression without having the nerve to stand on its own feet. And "think" adds to the sneakiness.

"Soused is an accurate description", is okay, although I'm not sure descriptions fits with accuracy. Accuracy is what it is. One records it.

You'll never be a writer JT. The proof readers will see to that.

As I have noted a number of times, Spendi. You are a study in confusion. You've just impaled yourself upon your own stupidity.

And speaking of 'sneaky' you haven't addressed what was said about your leader in confusion, Fowler. Nor have you addressed my questions on your about the "meaning of great".

I can imagine an inaccurate description of a tabby cat - "It was a pale rose colour, was twenty feet tall and had a long proboscis."