2
   

be of a reader. How can this sentence be right?

 
 
spendius
 
  2  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2012 11:28 am
@JTT,
I don't think "could be accurate" is sensible.

It's sneaky though. It seeks to make a particular impression without having the nerve to stand on its own feet. And "think" adds to the sneakiness.

"Soused is an accurate description", is okay, although I'm not sure descriptions fits with accuracy. Accuracy is what it is. One records it.

You'll never be a writer JT. The proof readers will see to that.
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2012 11:49 am
@spendius,
Quote:
I don't think "could be accurate" is sensible.

It's sneaky though. ... And "think" adds to the sneakiness.


As I have noted a number of times, Spendi. You are a study in confusion. You've just impaled yourself upon your own stupidity.

And speaking of 'sneaky' you haven't addressed what was said about your leader in confusion, Fowler. Nor have you addressed my questions on your about the "meaning of great".
0 Replies
 
contrex
 
  1  
Reply Sun 5 Aug, 2012 12:43 pm
@spendius,
spendius wrote:
"Soused is an accurate description", is okay, although I'm not sure descriptions fits with accuracy. Accuracy is what it is. One records it.


I can imagine an inaccurate description of a tabby cat - "It was a pale rose colour, was twenty feet tall and had a long proboscis."


0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Is this comma splice? Is it proper? - Question by DaveCoop
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
Is the second "playing needed? - Question by tanguatlay
should i put "that" here ? - Question by Chen Ta
Unbeknownst to me - Question by kuben123
alternative way - Question by Nousher Ahmed
Could check my grammar mistakes please? - Question by LonelyGamer
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 05/12/2021 at 03:28:41