Mass Shooting At Denver Batman Movie Premiere

It is unlikely that many of the people who wish to claim I am nuts can show a single point I'm wrong about.

oralloy wrote:

That is a contradiction. And who says they disagreed with me on gun laws?

I do. The stats of opinion polls do. I have met many people who have fought for freedom and survived and would never support your position. The British Legion does not support your position.

I have agreed that I would probably have voted "aye" on the 2nd.

I am objecting to you calling people who disagree with you "freedom haters".

You can't wrap yourself in the freedom flag with words.

Only people who have fought for freedom can do that.

You are blaspheming our Battle of Britain pilots in one sweet, easy breath.

And I feel sure the NRA doesn't use that expression. Or your Veterans associations.

Our Police Service does not support your position.

You're the real freedom hater because you use emotive propaganda to fill a void in your argument.

Cuddle your guns. Stroke them. Admire them. I don't care.

Just don't accuse your opponents of being freedom haters because they are not.

I haven't invented things to call your side.

You are wrong to say that gun control proponents are freedom haters. Dead wrong. Going in for cheapskate lies.

Quote:

But Scalia left open a big window for government gun control.

"Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited," he wrote in the syllabus of his opinion. "It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the [Second] Amendment or state analogs. The [Supreme] Court's opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms."

http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2012/07/29/Under-the-US-Supreme-Court-Gun-control-in-the-post-Aurora-world/UPI-13211343547000/#ixzz23lm55zoI

"It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose"

oralloy wrote:

Is sneaky bad?

It is when you are offering your hand in friendship with a concealed weapon on your person. It's real bad.

Antonin Scalia: There Are 'Undoubtedly' Limits To A Person's Right To Carry Guns
7/29/12

WASHINGTON -- Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said Sunday that there are "undoubtedly" limits to a person's right to bear arms under the Second Amendment, but that future court cases will have to decide where to draw the line.

During an appearance on "Fox News Sunday," Scalia was asked whether lawmakers have the right to ban high-capacity gun magazines without violating a person's constitutional right to bear arms. The question comes less than two weeks after the Colorado shooting massacre that left 12 dead and dozens more injured -- and at a time when neither President Barack Obama nor Congress appear willing to touch the issue of gun control.

"We'll see," Scalia said, suggesting that future court cases will determine what limitations on modern-day weapons are permissible.

"Some undoubtedly are [permissible] because there were some that were acknowledged at the time" the Constitution was written, Scalia said. He cited a practice from that era known as "frighting," where people "carried around a really horrible weapon just to scare people, like a head axe or something. That was, I believe, a misdemeanor."

“So yes, there are some limitations that can be imposed," Scalia said. "What they are will depend on what the society understood were reasonable limitations at the time."

The conservative justice notably authored the Supreme Court's 2008 opinion in District of Columbia v. Heller, which ruled that the Second Amendment protects a person's right to bear arms and struck down a D.C. ban on handguns. The court also ruled, though, that "the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/29/antonin-scalia-guns_n_1715969.html

Many jurisdictions in the US demand that if someone carries a gun in public, that it be done concealed.

He in fact used a civil war black power revolter that look like it could take down an elephant with one shot and no one ever try to ripped him off on the way to the bank drop box.

What to you pay the cops to do over there? Is it performing for the cameras after the event.

Footnote I once walk into the Homestead police station for some reason or other and found the cops was behind armor glass similar to a bank.

You can't blame them after all your talk about self defence.

Well they are doing something as two Homestead cops are just now being charge with beating up members of the public without cause.

Now you can tell me that there are no areas in say the city of London that it would be unwise to go into at night.

Gasoline burns and explosives surrounded by ball bearings/nails cause far more humane wounds.................LOL.