1
   

Cheney’s Energy Task Force Planned Iraq Invasion?

 
 
pistoff
 
Reply Mon 16 Feb, 2004 06:07 pm
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?040216fa_fact

CONTRACT SPORT
by JANE MAYER
What did the Vice-President do for Halliburton?
Issue of 2004-02-16 and 23
Posted 2004-02-09

Quote:
For months there has been a debate in Washington about when the Bush Administration decided to go to war against Saddam. In Ron Suskind's recent book "The Price of Loyalty," former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill charges that Cheney agitated for U.S. intervention well before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

Additional evidence that Cheney played an early planning role is contained in a previously undisclosed National Security Council document, dated February 3, 2001. The top-secret document, written by a high-level N.S.C. official, concerned Cheney's newly formed Energy Task Force. It directed the N.S.C. staff to coöperate fully with the Energy Task Force as it considered the "melding" of two seemingly unrelated areas of policy: "the review of operational policies towards rogue states," such as Iraq, and "actions regarding the capture of new and existing oil and gas fields."

A source who worked at the N.S.C. at the time doubted that there were links between Cheney's Energy Task Force and the overthrow of Saddam. But Mark Medish, who served as senior director for Russian, Ukrainian, and Eurasian affairs at the N.S.C. during the Clinton Administration, told me that he regards the document as potentially "huge." He said, "People think Cheney's Energy Task Force has been secretive about domestic issues," referring to the fact that the Vice-President has been unwilling to reveal information about private task-force meetings that took place in 2001, when information was being gathered to help develop President Bush's energy policy. "But if this little group was discussing geostrategic plans for oil, it puts the issue of war in the context of the captains of the oil industry sitting down with Cheney and laying grand, global plans."

After months spent trying to obtain more information about the classified Halliburton deals, Representative Waxman's staff discovered that the original oil-well-fire contract entrusted Halliburton with a full restoration of the Iraqi oil industry. "We thought it was supposed to be a short-term, small contract, but now it turns out Halliburton is restoring the entire oil infrastructure in Iraq," Waxman said.

The Defense Department's only public acknowledgments of this wide-ranging deal had been two press releases announcing that it had asked Halliburton to prepare to help put out oil-well fires. The most recent budget request provided by the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq mentions the building of a new oil refinery and the drilling of new wells. "They said originally they were just going to bring it up to prewar levels. Now they're getting money to dramatically improve it," Waxman complained. Who is going to own these upgrades, after the United States government has finished paying Halliburton to build them? "Who knows?" Waxman said. "Nobody is saying."

It is not surprising that Cheney, after five years of running Halliburton, a company that considers war as providing "growth opportunities," regards winning the peace in Iraq as a challenge for private enterprise as well as for government. Yet it is reasonable to ask if Cheney's faith in companies like Halliburton contributed to his conviction that the occupation of Iraq would be a tidy, easily managed affair.

Now that Cheney's vision has been shown to be overly optimistic, and Iraqis and American soldiers are still getting killed ten months after Saddam's overthrow, critics are questioning the propriety of a reconstruction effort that is fuelled by the profit motive. "I'm appalled that the war is being used by people close to the Bush Administration to make money for themselves," Waxman said. "At a time when we're asking young men and women to make perhaps the ultimate sacrifice, it's just unseemly."

Many of those involved, however, see themselves as part of a democratic vanguard. Jack Kemp's spokesman, P. J. Johnson, told me, "We're doing good by doing well." Joe Allbaugh, Bush's former campaign manager, who has established New Bridge Strategies, a firm aimed specifically at setting up for-profit ventures in Iraq, makes no apologies. "We are proud of the leadership the American private sector is taking in the reconstruction of Iraq," he said.


*Will the truth be revealed before the upcoming election? This could be the most damaging information yet and would topple the Neo Fascist Regime. It could lead to a War Crimes charge of all of the participants to the illegal invasion of Iraq.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 825 • Replies: 13
No top replies

 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Feb, 2004 06:34 pm
pistoff, We're gonna need more than speculation to tie Cheney with Haliburton's current reconstruction projects in Iraq. Those secret meetings with the captains of the energy industry are still "SECRET." Nobody's willing to release any information, because they understand "fear."
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Feb, 2004 07:09 pm
Maybe.
It's possible that Sacalia will be forced to recuse himself in this matter. If the SC votes to have the minutes of this meeting made public, it will blow the lid off of the scum bucket of coruption of Cheney,the Neo Fascists and the Power Brokers in the Energy Business.

Although, investigative reporters have been mostly spineless lately, there is still the chance that some have the guts to dig out the real story.

Yeah, I am biased and from my research, I believe that Cheney is a criminal in many ways. It's real obvious to me that Cheney is a war profiteer at and an outright traitor to America.

The question is: Will Cheney be charged with criminal acts?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Feb, 2004 07:13 pm
No, Cheney and GWBush will not be charged with criminal acts. Too many spineless people in positions that would have the kind of information that can be used against them.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Feb, 2004 07:55 pm
That and the minor fact that they have no evidence.
0 Replies
 
theollady
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 Feb, 2004 10:03 pm
Quote:
That and the minor fact that they have no evidence.


Like the elusive WMD, McGentrix, it's out there...

give us time, evidence will be traced.


(Now as I really think about it, I think there is more of a whiff of suspicion that Cheney and Halliburton are taking advantage of US voters and their money, than there ever was: that Iraq was amassing material to make a nuclear bomb, or Massively destructive weapons)
Just a thought on 'whiffing'.
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Feb, 2004 12:05 am
Still
Cheney has blood drippining from his hands. He is a sociapath and a serial killer.

Cheney the war profiteering scum still says this today:

Quote:
"There is no question that America did the right thing in Iraq,"

"America has shown we are serious about removing the threat of weapons of mass destruction," he said. "In Iraq, our survey group is still collecting data. The president has created a special commission to compare what our intelligence indicated before the war with what we've learned since, and it confirms much of what we thought before the war.

"We now know that Saddam Hussein had the capacity to produce weapons of mass destruction.... We know he had the necessary infrastructure because we found the labs and the dual-use facilities that could be used for these chemical and biological agents," the vice president said. "We know that he was developing the delivery systems -- ballistic missiles -- that had been prohibited by the United Nations
."
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Feb, 2004 12:33 am
Isn't it wonderful that our military men and women think they are doing their duty to protect the American People - and our way of life.
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Feb, 2004 12:48 am
It sure is! And I believe every word of that last quote, too. Relatively speaking... we have surgically removed a cancerous tumor from the skin of the earth. It is a pity the US had to step in and do the UN's job. But our brave military men and women have performed admirably. When was the last time a brutal dictator, a murderer of millions, was eliminated with such a relatively small loss of life?

edit= spelling error
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Feb, 2004 01:15 am
that's true, they were mostly Iraqis, and who really cares about them? Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Feb, 2004 01:22 am
I do Bob... and you know it. I was counting them too.
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Feb, 2004 01:33 am
State of the Union Lies
Direct From SoUA 2003

Quote:
Almost three months ago, the United Nations Security Council gave Saddam Hussein his final chance to disarm. He has shown instead utter contempt for the United Nations and for the opinion of the world. The 108 U.N. inspectors were sent to conduct -- were not sent to conduct a scavenger hunt for hidden materials across a country the size of California. The job of the inspectors is to verify that Iraq's regime is disarming. It is up to Iraq to show exactly where it is hiding its banned weapons, lay those weapons out for the world to see and destroy them as directed. Nothing like this has happened. The United Nations concluded in 1999 that Saddam Hussein had biological weapons materials sufficient to produce over 25,000 liters of anthrax; enough doses to kill several million people. He hasn't accounted for that material. He has given no evidence that he has destroyed it. The United Nations concluded that Saddam Hussein had materials sufficient to produce more than 38,000 liters of botulinum toxin; enough to subject millions of people to death by respiratory failure. He hasn't accounted for that material. He's given no evidence that he has destroyed it. Our intelligence officials estimate that Saddam Hussein had the materials to produce as much as 500 tons of sarin, mustard and VX nerve agent. In such quantities, these chemical agents could also kill untold thousands. He's not accounted for these materials. He has given no evidence that he has destroyed them. U.S. intelligence indicates that Saddam Hussein had upwards of 30,000 munitions capable of delivering chemical agents. Inspectors recently turned up 16 of them, despite Iraq's recent declaration denying their existence. Saddam Hussein has not accounted for the remaining 29,984 of these prohibited munitions. He has given no evidence that he has destroyed them. From three Iraqi defectors we know that Iraq, in the late 1990s, had several mobile biological weapons labs. These are designed to produce germ warfare agents and can be moved from place to a place to evade inspectors. Saddam Hussein has not disclosed these facilities. He has given no evidence that he has destroyed them.

The International Atomic Energy Agency confirmed in the 1990s that Saddam Hussein had an advanced nuclear weapons development program, had a design for a nuclear weapon and was working on five different methods of enriching uranium for a bomb. The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production. Saddam Hussein has not credibly explained these activities. He clearly has much to hide. The dictator of Iraq is not disarming. To the contrary, he is deceiving.


http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/01/28/sotu.transcript/
0 Replies
 
hobitbob
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Feb, 2004 01:59 am
OCCOM BILL wrote:
I do Bob... and you know it. I was counting them too.

I'm sure the Iraqis don't think it was a "relatively small loss of life." Too many Americans are willing to sacrifice others in the name of "national pride."
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Tue 17 Feb, 2004 06:17 am
Saddam/Cheney
I put these two about on the same level. Saddam and Cheney got along fine because they are both psycopaths, egomaniacal, greedy scum. Cheney should be in a little cold,damp cell let out to work in the laundry or some other strenuous task.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Cheney’s Energy Task Force Planned Iraq Invasion?
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 12/27/2024 at 01:11:13