@Leadfoot,
Missed this self congratulatory crap. Youv quit "engaging me" because you are arguing something that has not even been verified to the level of beingmore than a "tale from the desert "
Quote: The subject was whether the Bible says the earth is only 7000 years old,
To which I responded in a format that you are so quick to use but (apparently) disallow for others to use. I SAID-that if we use the Genesis Account of the Age of the Patriarchs, the Bible (KJV) coalesces around a 4000 yr-bp time line. 7000 years , although longer, has not been recognized by any Biblical SCholars or Jewish Bullshit detectors.
Quote: way off topic, no claim was made for Jesus' sign off
The only way appropriate to respond to your assertions is with HUMOR. (I may need to go to Merriam Webster to define what that is so you can undo your fake Mr Spockness)
Quote: I did state several facts in my post (not included in your quote) which were relevant to the subject and supported my argument, but it is you who were not constrained by those facts.
See above. Ive consistantly asked for evidence other than your embedded incredulity and you and BJ's consistant "Mix" of Biblical and religious excesses within this discussion is something I feel is kinda bit of some cheap trix.
Ive been really open and willing to discuss genetics and geology and chemistry as pertains to lifes ascension nd you usually just IGNORE EM. So what am I to do to get your assertions here they belong?
I aint gonna stop reacting to your statements that I do not "buy" in the least. So by you merely ignoring me will get you nothing except my free shot at you and what I consider som "dumass statements"
Your FEAR of the less than scientific work of the editorial Staff of the Discovery Institute and their "Senior Fellows" gives you adjida. Weve been deling with these guys in the P "SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARDS" for over 25 years. Youve been sucked into their club without ANY counter analyses and review of alternatives. I hve qnd I find them quite less than compelling despite your and gunga's predeliction to equate advanced degrees with "know how"
After my advanced degrees Ive been working 40+ fuckin years in these fields and the one thing Ive learned is to save the Conclusions till Ive read and understood all the supportive citations (AND the non-supportive ones). A good review for understanding may take many months of pure literature reviews .(Thats why I dont see any more assertive stuff from others about "neutral theory " as a selective ID tool)
I like the way youve summarized your feelings about these new Pre Hominin jaws that were found in Greece. Without any discussion ,
why -is-that?, you criticized the understanding of the fossil record wrt great apes and pre- Homo . Youve exposed a lot of how your catechist mind works.
Call me what you wish, It just aint gonna sink in and scare me off.