@HKVD,
Well written, Hk; tho no offense, a bit of paragraphing is always welcome
Quote:Yes, it could be argued that we are sentient beings therefore the universe must have a reason to exist if we're in it.
Well put Hk. While it's a purely intuitive notion, we mustn't underestimate the power of intuition. Clearly the Universe as is, has evolved by purely natural process, from the massive (infinitely massive?) tiny primordial spec (zero diameter?) of uniform composition then subsequent Big Bang. Judging from his relative lack of importance to the rest of it, however, he's hard to account for
Quote: So then, why not just have nothing at all?
Yea Hk, that's really the Big Q, isn't it. Intuition says that eventually (not now, partly because our dualistic languages don't permit) it will be shown that "nothingness" can't be, entailing paradox and contradiction; in other words, It, She, is here simply because She hasta be
Quote: I can't give an answer to something when I don't even really know anything.
You deserve a whole lot more credit. Just asking the right q's is an accomplishment
Quote:important- to realize that we possibly wouldn't even be able to understand the answer
I hafta disagree here, Hk. We'll be able to posit some of the the answers tho, like "nothingness," we won't be able to picture them in Minds' Eye
Quote:maybe the universe just exists to exist.
Well put Hk. One of the main problems is a kind of dualism where it isn't acknowledged that nothing is entirely anything while everything is partly something else; another, as I've indicated, is that we're stuck at present with a sort of dualism that won't permit Her in any form except anthropomorphic
Quote:A clock without a craftsman
My own intuition has a craftsman. Her body is The Universe, All, It; and the activity therein is Her thinking
Without revealing anything critical to your ID, Hk, please tell us something about yourself