1
   

The Stats: Bush Will Ride Into Power On American Ignorance

 
 
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2004 12:21 am
Both sides of the political spectrum took notice when Bush finally slipped below 50% in the approval ratings. But Democrats shouldn't break out the champaign just yet. An equally revealing statistic - and much less inspiring - is the news that American Idol ratings grabbed more viewers than Bush's State of the Union speech. That apathetic ignorance will be more of a hurdle for Democrats than any amount of infighting.

The statistics show a huge proportion of Americans, perhaps even a majority, are operating of a very twisted view of the world. Naturally, these misinformed and warped views of the world result in misinformed and warped political opinions. This ignorant attitude has a profound effect on American politics and in my opinion, it will ultimately decide who is the next president.

In the end, this is a bad thing for Democrats because American ignorance typically strengthens conservative points of view. For example, in the post-Sept 11th atmosphere it was seen as unpatriotic by many to question our governments policies. In that atmosphere most Americans believed unquestioningly that Iraq was a direct threat to America; that weapons of mass destruction were present in Iraq; that Saddam and Osama were in cahoots; that a 76 billion dollar missle defense system that, by all accounts, is utterly ineffective was a necessity. After all, politicians never lie and are never wrong. Except when they are. Like they were about Iraqi weapons. And Iraqi terrorist connections. And their disasterous economic policy.

Politicians (both Conservative and Democratic) have to deal with this American stupidity everyday. They will either have to pander to this ignorance, or run the risk of alienating themselves from the majority of voters. Whenever a Democrat points out the obvious truth about the Iraq war they risk being accused of being unpatriotic by throngs of uninformed fools who are staunchly pro-war even though they have no real reason for their opinion beyond a typical conservative gut instinct America can do only good.

Consider the American mindset: According to a poll by the Washington Times a few months ago 70% of Americans believe Saddam Hussien was "personally connected" to September 11th. This assertion was just as absurd then as it is now. Even today - despite administrative backpedaling - the belief persists. Another poll, conducted by the Associated Press, indicated that 79%'deliberative poll' offers some insight here. A random sample of citizens spent the day debating about Americas role in the world with a panel of bi-partisan experts. They were asked questions before and after. Another group of random citizens (a control group) was simply asked the questions without going through the learning process. Consider the results:

Quote:
Forum participants became significantly less tolerant of the cost of the warÂ….only 21% of participants agreed post-deliberation with the statement that "by the time we leave Iraq, the results will have been worth the cost in lives and dollars," compared with 36% prior to deliberation (and 35% of control group). Sixty eight percent of participants believed that the war in Iraq had impeded the War on Terror, compared with only 42% of the control group. There were very high levels of support for involving other countries and/or the UN in Iraq, with 88% of participants and 76% of the control group agreeing that "the US should share its control of Iraq with other countries or the UN in return for their sharing more of the military and financial burden." Participants were also less concerned about the establishment of democracy in Iraq than was the control group (12% versus 42% believing it was important), while they were more concerned than the control group with establishing a stable government there (86% of participants versus 74% of the control group).


These statistics indicate that the more informed people become, the more they oppose Bush's core policies. The participants were far less likely to support the war, they were more likely to want internationalization, they thought the War on Terror was being fumbled.

In todays America, where patriotism is synonymous with blind support of government, it has become taboo for candidates to speak truthfully about certain subjects. Instead, Democrats are forced to pander to American ignorance to avoid losing votes. Look at what happened to Howard Dean (not that I am a Dean supporter) when he spoke openly about Saddam Hussien.

When Howard Dean said that Hussiens capture "had not made America any safer" he was merely vocalizing the sentiments of many informed observers. It was a perfectly reasonable statement. Dean was summarily lambasted by the uninformed masses, who assumed his statement to be the height of absurdity. He should have known better than to state the truth. The real truth is, as much as America bemoans the lack of truth in politics, truth is a pariah in politics. Truth is the first casualty of American politics. Truth doesn't win elections; vague generalities, giving speeches (written by someone else, of course) while staring melodramatically into the distance, appeals to religion, and traipsing around on a political soundstage is what wins elections. Bush is adept at this.

He is perhaps less comfortable than any other American president giving unscripted appearances before the general public. Instead, he prefers to go gallivanting around the nation dressed in an Air Force jacket and giving speeches to military audiences - this way, he knows he can count on a strong applause and a large showing. It also has the effect of drawing attention away from his own questionable military record.

And so, nobody really seems to notice when his stated reasons for war are disproven one by one (just as most informed people knew they would all along.) Our reason for killing 8,000 - 10,000 innocent civilians and over 500
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 652 • Replies: 2
No top replies

 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Tue 10 Feb, 2004 12:34 am
ILZ, I'm afraid all of us are only rehashing the same opinions over and over again to a very few minority of people involved on A2K, and what you say about the majority of Americans holds much truth. However, there are more angry Americans out there than we are lead to believe. Those 500 dead American soldiers and over 7,000 wounded have family and friends that are now wondering what their sacrifice was for if Iraq had no WMD's. I'm not sure how people can justify the killing of over 10,000 innocent Iraqi men, women, and children to topple one tyrant called Saddam. Bush keeps saying "each life is precious," but he doesn't seem to mind killing thousands of Iraqis who never posed a threat to the American People. Somewhere in the back of people's minds, that must be disturbing - if they have any conscience at all. Let's hope the American People wakes up to see the real tyrant of the world - GWBush. I still have faith that the majority of Americans are fairminded people. For Bush and his henchmen to claim that our intelligence was wrong is not acceptable, because Saddam was contained, and he was not a threat to anybody. We must keep reminding Americans that, yes, each life is precious, and that includes Iraqi's.
0 Replies
 
IronLionZion
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Feb, 2004 06:41 pm
cicerone imposter wrote:
ILZ, I'm afraid all of us are only rehashing the same opinions over and over again to a very few minority of people involved on A2K, and what you say about the majority of Americans holds much truth. However, there are more angry Americans out there than we are lead to believe. Those 500 dead American soldiers and over 7,000 wounded have family and friends that are now wondering what their sacrifice was for if Iraq had no WMD's. I'm not sure how people can justify the killing of over 10,000 innocent Iraqi men, women, and children to topple one tyrant called Saddam. Bush keeps saying "each life is precious," but he doesn't seem to mind killing thousands of Iraqis who never posed a threat to the American People. Somewhere in the back of people's minds, that must be disturbing - if they have any conscience at all. Let's hope the American People wakes up to see the real tyrant of the world - GWBush. I still have faith that the majority of Americans are fairminded people. For Bush and his henchmen to claim that our intelligence was wrong is not acceptable, because Saddam was contained, and he was not a threat to anybody. We must keep reminding Americans that, yes, each life is precious, and that includes Iraqi's.


True. But I somehow doubt that most Americans care as much about innocent Iraqi deaths as they do American deaths. In the end, it is the apathetic ignorance of Americanshat will doom us all to four more years of Bush. If people were more interested in learning, few of them would vote to re-elect Bush - this is clear from the stats quoted above. After all, it is hard for any informed individual to make a coherant pro-war/pro-Bush stance (not that they don't try.) It is the ignorance of the masses and thier refusal to educate themselves that is ruining our nation.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The Stats: Bush Will Ride Into Power On American Ignorance
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 04/27/2024 at 10:26:38