@oralloy,
Quote:The erroneous profile was not the cause of the shooting. The violent assault is what prompted Zimmerman to shoot.
The erroneous profiling was what motivated the subsequent actions on Zimmerman's part that then brought him into contact with a person he wound up killing. So yes, it was the erroneous profiling, or misinterpretation of the situation, by Zimmerman, that did eventually lead to the shooting.
But what prompted or provoked the "violent assault"?
To believe George Zimmerman's version of how he happened to get punched and assaulted, and what his "attacker" said to him during this assault, one would have to believe that Trayvon Martin was given to unpredictable, sudden episodes of psychotic, out-of-control, murderous rage, in response to little or no provocation.That's what Zimmerman claimed and described. He didn't describe someone who was behaving like a tough criminal type, he described a murderous lunatic who suddenly attacked a total stranger with the stated intention of killing him.
The problem is, that description of Martin's behavior isn't at all credible. It defies everything known about Trayvon Martin, a kid with no history of aggressive outbursts and behaviors, fighting, or instigating physical assaults--and absolutely no history of flying into blind murderous rages.
And the description also doesn't fit with what Martin was doing and feeling immediately prior to that confrontation as reported by the girl he was talking to on his cell phone at the time. He told her he was being followed by a "creepy guy", and his emotion was apprehension and not anger, and, in response to sensing his fear, the girl told Martin to run from the man and get home as fast as possible. And the last thing the girl heard Martin saying, to Zimmerman, who had just approached him, was, "Get off me, get off me."
If Zimmerman wasn't the provocateur, and the instigator, why would Martin have said, "Get off me, get off me" to him?
I think, the only really credible, and logical, interpretation of the events that led to the altercation suggests that Zimmerman's "creepy" and suspicious and confrontational behaviors frightened Martin and provoked an understandable
defensive punch in the nose from him. And I believe the final trigger for that defensive/aggressive response by Martin was some action by Zimmerman, either reaching toward his gun, or grabbing Martin's sleeve, because Zimmerman didn't want the kid to get away before the police showed up.
Martin had no idea who this crazy man was, or why he was following him--and he understandably perceived Zimmerman as being "suspicious" and a threat to him--which is what he conveyed to his friend on the phone. And I believe that Martin was trying to protect himself, and subdue this threatening man, so he could get away from him and get back to the residence where he was a guest.
I do not believe the assault on Zimmerman was unprovoked by him, and I do not believe that murderous intentions were expressed by Martin.
So yes, I believe that Martin punched Zimmerman and continued to struggle with him on the ground, but I do not believe that he instigated the fight, and I don't believe Zimmerman was ever really in mortal danger. Zimmerman unnecessarily responded to punches with a bullet, and he provoked those punches. The day after the shooting, Zimmerman's relatively minor injuries, that required no real medical treatment, were covered with a few band-aids, while Trayvon Martin lay dead in a morgue. Zimmerman, and his poor judgment and impulsiveness, was the real threat to Martin, from the beginning to the end of the entire episode, and not the other way around.
Zimmerman seems to have a pattern of provoking people into anger and causing them to take action against him. That's exactly what he did to the judge in this case by misleading the judge about his assets and second passport--he provoked the judge into giving him a symbolic punch in the nose by revoking and then considerably raising his bail. The judge was defending the integrity of the legal process by that symbolic punch, just as Martin was likely defending himself with his punches to Zimmerman--and, in both instances, it was Zimmerman who provoked the other party and put himself on the receiving end of their response. He is no innocent victim. He is also a deceptive liar who cannot be taken at his word.
I do not believe that Zimmerman is guilty of second degree murder, but I do believe he is guilty of manslaughter--he unnecessarily caused the death of Trayvon Martin. I do not believe his action in shooting Martin was legally justifiable self defense--he provoked, and then over-reacted, to what was nothing more than a fairly evenly matched fist fight until he decided to use his gun.