@gungasnake,
gungasnake wrote:
Somebody you don't really know anything about is sitting there pounding your head into the pavement and you're gonna "warn" them before you do something about it???
If that something is as irreversible as causing their death, yes. Especially considering that the warning is just as likely to result in them getting off of you as shooting them is. How do you argue on one hand that it's wrong to punch someone (you don't know anything about who is following you with something in his hand) without warning and on the other that it's perfectly reasonable, smart even, to shoot someone without warning in a fist fight?
All of this, once again, assumes that the person with the most to gain by lying is telling the truth about what happened. And you call me stupid.