37
   

The politics of hoodie wearing

 
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  0  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 04:26 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:
actually the average price of an AK-47 in Afghanistan is around $400. The average price worldwide is $534. And most of those are in places where they are legal or quasi-legal. Everything costs more in the US and if we had sensible gun control laws they'd be very very black, black market, and very high.
I believe that figure is from CBS News 6O Minutes.
I don t see a reason for them to distort that fact.
U sure see many (ubiquitous??) little Moslem boys, not much over babies, in the Mid-East
holding AK 47s on the news a lot. I don't think thay went for your price.




MontereyJack wrote:
Not a good example either. You can't drink an AK-47 a week. You can a fifth of whiskey (or in a day), which makes the profit margin and the replacement margin far higher on bootleg whiskey than bootleg guns. Also the punishment for whiskey possession would be just a tiny fraction of the penalty for an AK47. Again, a poor analogy. Read the 2nd amendment.
Yeah, I guess u think I haven 't done that yet.


MontereyJack wrote:
Guns were for use in the militia, which was government controlled
and was used in place of a standing army.
Historically, your chosen point of vu has been discredited by the USSC.
The applicable history was set forth at length in the decision.
Grammatically, your expressed opinion has been disproven
by the professional grammarians, who parsed it.
( I have a tenant, a liberal Democrat that ofen argues with me,
who is an English professor at Queens College, who agrees with those grammarians. [Now u 'll say he was afraid I 'd raise the rent.] )
The known history, (including the fact that each citizen had to take care of himself
because there were NO police in the USA, nor in England until the next century)
and the parsed text COMPLIMENT each other. Both ways: u lose. Personal freedom WINS.



MontereyJack wrote:
It doesn't exist in that form anymore. Nowhere in the Consitution does it mention self-defense. You failed to give any example of it. That's cause it simply isn't there. It's you being the judicial activist, David, not the original interpreter.
That is the babbling of a loser, looking in from the outside.
FREEDOM has won; your side, mendacious liberalism, has lost.
I ONLY support judicial activism to the extent that it corrects
the mistakes, the distortions of liberalism and
re-establishes the Original status quo ante.


U can take comfort in the fact that in the end,
before the turn of the next century,
your grandchildren will live in a fouler, more thorough despotism
than communism or nazism ever were, when humanity becomes the Borg, and welcomes it.
That will be very, very collectivistic; u 'll love it.

I 'm pretty sure that I will not live anywhere near long enuf to see that.
0 Replies
 
adippered
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 04:29 am
@Foofie,
I am 44 and wear my hoodies with pride I am no thug I will wear what I want ditched the mini skirts now LOL
maxdancona
 
  2  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 07:38 am
@adippered,
If you are a white woman, you can wear a hoodie without fear. If you are a white man, than the mini-skirts might get you strange looks.
snood
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 07:55 am
@maxdancona,
maxdancona wrote:

If you are a white woman, you can wear a hoodie without fear. If you are a white man, than the mini-skirts might get you strange looks.


Not in 'Frisco
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 09:46 am
Wrong, David, every time an innocent person is shot down, freedom loses. Any time a kid is killed as "collateral damage" in someone else's argument, freedom loses.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 10:05 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:

Wrong, David, every time an innocent person is shot down, freedom loses. Any time a kid is killed as "collateral damage" in someone else's argument, freedom loses.


We don't know that an innocent has been killed here, zimmerman and local officials concluded that Martin deserved to die, and we don't have enough knowledge of the facts or evidence to dispute that call.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  3  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 10:27 am
hawkeye says:
Quote:
zimmerman and local officials concluded that Martin deserved to die


I don't know about you, but I'm not comfortable with the idea that someone who at the very least provoked a confrontation with someone who had done nothing gets to be judge, jury, and executioner as a result of his own mistake.
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 10:52 am
@MontereyJack,
MontereyJack wrote:

hawkeye says:
Quote:
zimmerman and local officials concluded that Martin deserved to die


I don't know about you, but I'm not comfortable with the idea that someone who at the very least provoked a confrontation with someone who had done nothing gets to be judge, jury, and executioner


I am not, but that is how Stand Your Ground laws are written. Zimmerman must be judged by the laws we have, not by the laws we wish we had, or by our emotions. We should also undertake a massive reform of our laws, as I have been saying for years.

Quote:
of his mistake


This is an unsubstantiated assertion.
0 Replies
 
MontereyJack
 
  2  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 10:57 am
Trayvon was entirely innocent when Zimmerman went after him. I don't think that's an unsubstantiated assertion at all. That was Zimmerman's mistake, for which Trayvon ultimately died.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 11:00 am
@DrewDad,
There was no need to, and it flirts with being unethical.
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 11:06 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Um... how?
0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  0  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 11:19 am
I'll say it again: If the kid had simply decked Zimmerman and walked away, three would be no dead bodies in the picture. On the other hand, when you sucker punch somebody and then pounce on them with the obvious intention of literally beating the life out of them, and particularly if you're dopey enough to do that to somebody with a pistol in his pocket, you should not be too shocked or surprised when you get shot and killed.

Other than that, the real question is, when was the last time that the president and AG of the United States ever joined a lynch mob?
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 11:22 am
This lady special prosecutor who the governor has put in charge of this **** has said she'll have a major announcement on Friday and that figures to be fairly interesting. From the descriptions of the event I've read and the way the law is written in Fla., I don't see how she could charge the guy with anything.
0 Replies
 
wandeljw
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 11:28 am
Quote:
Prosecutor to make announcement soon in Martin case

SANFORD, Florida (CNN) -
A special prosecutor plans to release new information within days about the controversial case involving 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, who was shot to death by a neighborhood watch volunteer.

Angela Corey said Tuesday the information will be released in the next three days. Her announcement came the same day that attorneys for George Zimmerman, who says he shot Martin in self-defense, told reporters they had lost contact with Zimmerman and no longer represent him.

"He has gone on his own. I'm not sure what he's doing or who he's talking to," said Craig Sonner, Zimmerman's former legal adviser. "If he wants us to come back as counsel, he will contact us."

Sonner, who said the attorneys last were in touch with Zimmerman on Sunday, spoke to reporters in Florida with attorney Hal Uhrig.

Corey is deciding whether charges will be filed against Zimmerman in Martin's death. However, Sonner said Wednesday that he still believes Zimmerman's claim of self-defense.

"I believe that he's gotten a raw deal from the media, that the media has tried to convict him wrongfully," he said. "When the facts come out, it'll show he acted in self-defense, that the police department made the proper decision in not arresting him, as there was not probable cause to make the arrest."

"Something changed around Sunday," Sonner told CNN, "and (Zimmerman) cut off all contact and has started doing things without telling me he's doing them."

Meanwhile, Attorney General Eric Holder referenced the Martin case in a speech to the National Action Network's 14th annual convention in Washington on Wednesday, pledging that the Justice Department will "conduct a thorough and independent review of the evidence."

"I know that many of you are greatly -- and rightly -- concerned" about Martin's death, Holder said -- "a young man whose future has been lost to the ages."

The department's investigation, launched three weeks ago, remains open, he said, which "prevents me from talking in detail about this matter." Holder did note, however, that Justice Department officials had recently traveled to Sanford, Florida, where the shooting took place, to meet with Martin's family, community members and local authorities. The FBI is assisting, he said.

Uhrig said Tuesday that Zimmerman had, on his own, called Sean Hannity of Fox News and called Corey's office.

"One of the things every defense attorney tells his client is, don't talk to the prosecutors. Don't talk to the cops. Frankly, don't talk to anybody until we get control of the situation, and do it through counsel," Uhrig said.

He added that he was concerned about his former client's "emotional and physical safety" and said Zimmerman could be suffering from "post-traumatic stress."

Sonner said Wednesday that he believes Zimmerman called Corey because "he wanted to give his side of the story to the prosecutors, and we were going to arrange for that to happen. ... If he would have worked through me, I would have allowed him to make his statement."

Zimmerman would not return phone calls so arrangements could be made for him to meet with the prosecutor, Sonner said.

The case has sparked a nationwide debate about race in America and Florida's "stand your ground" law, which allows people to use deadly force anywhere they feel a reasonable threat of death or serious injury. Thousands of protesters have descended on Sanford to demand Zimmerman's arrest.

Asked about potential pressure, Corey told CNN affiliate WJXT on Tuesday: "It's not pressure. I mean, the point is, when you are seeking justice, you've only got one course of action, and that's to do everything you can to find out the full truth." That, she said, involves analyzing physical evidence, talking to witnesses, "whatever it takes to get to that bottom line."

Asked about the case's effects, Corey said: "Of course it's affected my daily life, but what it won't affect is our sound judgment on this case." She said she is used to high-profile cases, but she is keeping the focus on Martin and on obtaining the answers his family deserves.
0 Replies
 
FreeDuck
 
  5  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 12:33 pm
@gungasnake,
gungasnake wrote:

I'll say it again: If the kid had simply decked Zimmerman and walked away, three would be no dead bodies in the picture. On the other hand, when you sucker punch somebody and then pounce on them with the obvious intention of literally beating the life out of them, and particularly if you're dopey enough to do that to somebody with a pistol in his pocket, you should not be too shocked or surprised when you get shot and killed.


All of this assumes that Zimmerman is telling the truth. He has a vested interest in making it sound like the kid attacked him. If you'll remember, the first story was that he attacked Zimmerman from behind when he got out of his car to check what street he was on. That changed when the recording of his call to the police revealed that he had followed the kid. I suspect the story will change again. At any rate, where I'm from, a sucker punch is a punch from behind. Last I checked, a person's nose is not located on the back of one's head.
gungasnake
 
  0  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 12:43 pm
@FreeDuck,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sucker_punch
FreeDuck
 
  5  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 12:50 pm
@gungasnake,
I doubt that Zimmerman had no warning, and I'm confused as to how hitting someone without warning seems to be viewed by you as a more serious crime than shooting someone without warning.
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 01:55 pm
@gungasnake,
OK, please explain how the President of the United States has joined a lynch mob.

Expressing sympathy for someone is joining a lynch mob?
roger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 02:00 pm
@DrewDad,
I don't know about 'lynch', but I had the clear impression he was inciting a mob back when AIT executive bonuses were made public. I'm not kidding, and these were the people brought in to straighten the mess up. About his first year in office, and not the least bit presidential.
gungasnake
 
  1  
Reply Wed 11 Apr, 2012 02:11 pm
@FreeDuck,
Somebody you don't really know anything about is sitting there pounding your head into the pavement and you're gonna "warn" them before you do something about it???

http://thewifehatessports.com/wp-content/gallery/twhs-regular-features/stupid-pills-the-wife-hates-sports.jpg
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 12/26/2024 at 09:47:55