1
   

If You Think Janet's Breast Is a Worry

 
 
au1929
 
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2004 03:11 pm
BusinessWeek Online

If You Think Janet's Breast Is a Worry... By Eric Wahlgren and Amey Stone

Updated: 7:00 p.m. ET Feb. 03, 2004For the record, we didn't like it, either. Who tuned into Super Bowl XXXVIII expecting to see such a spectacle of a halftime show, with the finale built around a bare boob? One of us watching the gyrations was with an impressionable 4-year-old, who saw dance moves that definitely aren't taught in her toddler ballet class. For her, the "wardrobe malfunction" was possibly the least of the shockers on stage that night. And we don't accept the performers' and network's apologies claiming it was an accident.



What really alarms us now, however, is how much attention the Janet Jackson breast-bearing flap is getting. The Federal Communications Commission is vowing to figure out if the episode violated indecency standards. If so, Viacom (VIAB), whose MTV division produced the show and whose CBS unit aired it, could face steep penalties. There are reports that Time Warner (TWX), whose America Online unit sponsored the spectacle, wants some of its money back.

Let's all get a grip. It seems this was just a bad publicity stunt. Should we really be so surprised? After all, Jackson and Justin Timberlake could hardly be expected to waltz across the stage like Ginger Rogers and Fred Astaire [now that would have been truly shocking].

The world has a lot more pressing concerns right now than a bodice-ripping snafu during the Super Bowl halftime show. Want something really worth worrying about? Want to spend taxpayer dollars on something more important than a probe into Nipplegate? Here are a few concerns that top our list:

Osama bin Laden: Where the heck is he? The U.S. has been hunting for the mastermind of the September 11 attacks for more than two years now. Last week, the military said it was "sure" it would catch the six-foot, four-inch terrorist leader this year. But for now, all they have are those scratchy video and audio tapes he keeps putting out.

Jobs: Where the heck are they? Back in October, Treasury Secretary John Snow predicted the U.S. economy would create 200,000 jobs a month. Even at that rate, it would have been slow going to get the 3 million folks who lost their jobs in the downturn back to work. But it's not even close. In December, only 1,000 jobs were created. Ouch.

The Growing Deficit: Uncle Sam's sea of red ink for fiscal 2004 is now projected to be more than $500 billion and seems to growing by the day. When will the tide turn? And who's going to pay for it? Parents today should be a lot more worried about the monstrous debt being foisted on their children than Janet Jackson's burst bustier.

Health Care: Politicians pay nothing but lip service to the biggest problem that will face most Americans in their lifetimes: Access to quality medical care. The Medicare program is grossly underfunded, and with millions of baby boomers entering their Golden Years, companies are forcing existing retirees to pay full freight if they want to stay on corporate health plans. If nothing is done, wait until the children who watched that halftime show catch a glimpse of the cost of caring for their aging parents 30 years from now.

The 2004 Presidential Election: Doesn't matter if you want Bush in or out. What's really worrisome is how few people vote in this country: Only 50% of eligible voters cast ballots in the Presidential election in 2000, down from 63% in 1960. Pathetic -- and even worse when you consider that roughly half the adult population doesn't even register, which means only 25% of voting-age Americans decide who moves into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Iceland puts the U.S. to shame with a 87% turnout. C'mon folks, aren't isn't this supposed to be the world's greatest democracy?

Interest Rates: Alan Greenspan & Co. dropped a minibomb in January. Instead of saying the Federal Reserve would leave borrowing costs alone for a "considerable period," the Fed chief commented that the central bank would be "patient" about lifting rates. In Fedspeak, that subtle change in tone means: Get ready for a hike. That's the kind of shock -- to stock portfolios, home prices, and debt payments -- that could have significant consequences for millions of Americans this year.

Infectious Diseases: Now there's an outbreak of the avian flu in Asia to worry about. Last year, it was SARS. In 1918, the Spanish Flu killed 40 million people. Infectious diseases such as malaria still kill millions of people every year in the developing world. Now that's something to keep you up at night.

Bennifer: Here's a troublesome development for young adults: If Ben and JLo, with all their money and looks, can't get hitched, what are the chances for the government's initiative to promote marriage. And who's going to fill the tabloid pages now? Janet and Justin?

Martha: She's in a heck of a lot more trouble than Janet. And Valentine's Day is around the corner! Who will we turn to for advice on preparing that perfect candlelit dinner for two
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,054 • Replies: 14
No top replies

 
caprice
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2004 03:57 pm
I agree with everything except the last two items. I know they were tongue in cheek, but it didn't really fit with the sentiment of the rest of the article.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2004 04:01 pm
That was just a taste of the writers humor. His point being the public spends so much time, effort and press worrying on the trivial and unimportant and tend to ignore the real problems. I am sure that is just fine with our politicians. Keep the public distracted with ther trivia.
.
0 Replies
 
husker
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2004 04:04 pm
Imagine what it would be like if there would have been a double exposure! Smile
0 Replies
 
kjvtrue
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2004 05:58 pm
Re: If You Think Janet's Breast Is a Worry
au1929 wrote:
BusinessWeek Online

If You Think Janet's Breast Is a Worry... By Eric Wahlgren and Amey Stone

Updated: 7:00 p.m. ET Feb. 03, 2004For the record, we didn't like it, either. Who tuned into Super Bowl XXXVIII expecting to see such a spectacle of a halftime show, with the finale built around a bare boob? One of us watching the gyrations was with an impressionable 4-year-old, who saw dance moves that definitely aren't taught in her toddler ballet class. For her, the "wardrobe malfunction" was possibly the least of the shockers on stage that night. And we don't accept the performers' and network's apologies claiming it was an accident.



What really alarms us now, however, is how much attention the Janet Jackson breast-bearing flap is getting. The Federal Communications Commission is vowing to figure out if the episode violated indecency standards. If so, Viacom (VIAB), whose MTV division produced the show and whose CBS unit aired it, could face steep penalties. There are reports that Time Warner (TWX), whose America Online unit sponsored the spectacle, wants some of its money back.

Let's all get a grip. It seems this was just a bad publicity stunt. Should we really be so surprised? After all, Jackson and Justin Timberlake could hardly be expected to waltz across the stage like Ginger Rogers and Fred Astaire [now that would have been truly shocking].

The world has a lot more pressing concerns right now than a bodice-ripping snafu during the Super Bowl halftime show. Want something really worth worrying about? Want to spend taxpayer dollars on something more important than a probe into Nipplegate? Here are a few concerns that top our list:

Osama bin Laden: Where the heck is he? The U.S. has been hunting for the mastermind of the September 11 attacks for more than two years now. Last week, the military said it was "sure" it would catch the six-foot, four-inch terrorist leader this year. But for now, all they have are those scratchy video and audio tapes he keeps putting out.
"Agree!"

au1929 wrote:
Jobs: Where the heck are they? Back in October, Treasury Secretary John Snow predicted the U.S. economy would create 200,000 jobs a month. Even at that rate, it would have been slow going to get the 3 million folks who lost their jobs in the downturn back to work. But it's not even close. In December, only 1,000 jobs were created. Ouch.
Where I live, I see wanted sighns everywhere, it seems like people want high paying jobs delivered on a Silver Plater.

au1929 wrote:
The Growing Deficit: Uncle Sam's sea of red ink for fiscal 2004 is now projected to be more than $500 billion and seems to growing by the day. When will the tide turn? And who's going to pay for it? Parents today should be a lot more worried about the monstrous debt being foisted on their children than Janet Jackson's burst bustier.
bla, bla, bla

au1929 wrote:
Health Care: Politicians pay nothing but lip service to the biggest problem that will face most Americans in their lifetimes: Access to quality medical care. The Medicare program is grossly underfunded, and with millions of baby boomers entering their Golden Years, companies are forcing existing retirees to pay full freight if they want to stay on corporate health plans. If nothing is done, wait until the children who watched that halftime show catch a glimpse of the cost of caring for their aging parents 30 years from now.
disagree

au1929 wrote:
The 2004 Presidential Election: Doesn't matter if you want Bush in or out. What's really worrisome is how few people vote in this country: Only 50% of eligible voters cast ballots in the Presidential election in 2000, down from 63% in 1960. Pathetic -- and even worse when you consider that roughly half the adult population doesn't even register, which means only 25% of voting-age Americans decide who moves into 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Iceland puts the U.S. to shame with a 87% turnout. C'mon folks, aren't isn't this supposed to be the world's greatest democracy?
Agree

au1929 wrote:
Interest Rates: Alan Greenspan & Co. dropped a minibomb in January. Instead of saying the Federal Reserve would leave borrowing costs alone for a "considerable period," the Fed chief commented that the central bank would be "patient" about lifting rates. In Fedspeak, that subtle change in tone means: Get ready for a hike. That's the kind of shock -- to stock portfolios, home prices, and debt payments -- that could have significant consequences for millions of Americans this year.
Do you have proof? Question

au1929 wrote:
Infectious Diseases: Now there's an outbreak of the avian flu in Asia to worry about. Last year, it was SARS. In 1918, the Spanish Flu killed 40 million people. Infectious diseases such as malaria still kill millions of people every year in the developing world. Now that's something to keep you up at night.

Bennifer: Here's a troublesome development for young adults: If Ben and JLo, with all their money and looks, can't get hitched, what are the chances for the government's initiative to promote marriage. And who's going to fill the tabloid pages now? Janet and Justin?
"Agree!"

au1929 wrote:
Martha: She's in a heck of a lot more trouble than Janet. And Valentine's Day is around the corner! Who will we turn to for advice on preparing that perfect candlelit dinner for two
Julia Chiles on PBS
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2004 06:02 pm
I haven't seen Larry King for a while. Given his penchant for interviewing the most important newsmakers of the day, I wonder if it's been non-stop Janet and Jason (and "experts" who can comment on them)...
0 Replies
 
caprice
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2004 06:12 pm
Who's Jason? Or do you mean Justin?

That oughta be an indicator of his popularity status. *L* I find him very unappealling myself.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2004 06:17 pm
Sadly, more Americans know who Justin and Janet are than know who their Senators and Representatives are.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2004 06:24 pm
But let one be caught with his "pants down" and the entire electorate will know his name. Embarrassed
0 Replies
 
caprice
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2004 06:28 pm
Gee, speaking from personal experience au1929? *L* (Just kidding. Unless I'm right of course! Wink)
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2004 06:32 pm
Unfortunately NO
0 Replies
 
caprice
 
  1  
Reply Wed 4 Feb, 2004 06:37 pm
Oh? You WANT to be caught with your pants down? Or....maybe it's more the "reason" for having your pants down in the first place!

Uhm....I don't really want to know. The visuals in my head are really disturbing. *L*
0 Replies
 
chaossoldiermsc
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Feb, 2004 07:01 am
that's why i say: come to Singapore!!!
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Feb, 2004 09:59 am
Of course, one could have turned channels so as not to be exposed to nipples and dancing which suggests sex.

One could have, for example, watched a vampire (or Arnold) rip the heart from someone's chest, or gobbled homemade popcorn as the Matrix actors in their lovely long black Columbine overcoats sent eight thousand bullets ripping into flesh, or even sucked up some soda while sucking up the happy lies of political spokespeople.

Michael Powell is my hero.
0 Replies
 
Dartagnan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Feb, 2004 10:17 am
I did mean Justin (not Jason). So many younger dudes have those names, I get confused.

Re Michael Powell: His reaction reminds me of Claude Raines' famous line in Casablanca: "I'm shocked--shocked!--to learn that this kind of obscene behavior is being shown on television!"

Right, Michael!
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » If You Think Janet's Breast Is a Worry
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/29/2024 at 02:15:10