@izzythepush,
Quote:I've just had a chat with OmSigDave over my use of the phrase 'there's better things to spend money on.' He asked why I hadn't written 'there are' or 'there're' instead. It's because of how I speak, I would say 'there are,' if I was thinking about it, but I'd never say 'there're.' ' There's' may be wrong in that instance, but it's how I talk.
It's not wrong at all, Izzy. It's completely natural. Existential 'there' with singular verb + plural delayed subject is much preferred in all spoken/written English. A study of spoken discourse by Celce-Murcia and Hudson in 1981 "confirmed that
there's predominates in informal speech, even when a plural noun phrase follows the verb".
When you "think about it", it isn't natural language at all. You've seen OmSig "think" about language issues and when he does, he's pretty much always out to lunch.
I long ago said, English speakers do their language much much better than they analyse their language.