@jcboy,
jcboy wrote:
I got a ticket in the mail today along with a photo of me sitting behind the wheel of my car. Apparently I made a right turn against a red light. Boy those red light camers sure take a close-up photo. Oh well, I’ll just pay the sucker and be done with it. Here you can make a right turn against a red light, unless of course a sign is posted, which I didn't see, son’s of bitches!
In the US the red light camera is actually against the laws of most states. I know the state that I am in, the law states that you are allowed to directly address your accuser. In other words if you are given a ticket (violation) then in court you should be allowed to address the ticking officer in a trial setting. However a red light camera you can not address and the government assumes people don't know the law and will just do what you do and pay the fine. This is why the cameras remain up because people just do what they wanted and pay their fines without hassling to go to court.
Law enforcement is no longer about serving the people, it is becoming a for profit industry. They no longer do anything unless there money to be made. Red light cameras have been shown to not reduce accidents yet the arguments for why they are there is for that reason. So if they don't in fact cause a reduction in accidents why are they there? It is because the argument is bogus and meant to cover up the real reason, profit. They know the human nature is to make mistakes and they want to capitalize on it. These things pump in tons of money for a non existent crime.