@gungasnake,
If you look at his entire "Thory" it appeals to a lot of "consent from dead authority" He credits himself in his "Teemosis theory" with communication from Crick, a communication noone will, alas, be able to verify.
Further, Venrdaminis only comments ON, are from a few bloggers who tear him a neat new asshole for being a fraud and unablereferred to to back up a single piece of crap he sows. His views on several neanderthal specimesn, such as those evidencing "hunchbackism" were carefully viewed in a paper about "Paleo pathology" of Neanderthal trauma. CAreful analyses of several specimens , including
those youve referred to, have been shown to be trauma victims and the "Hunchback issue" has been analyzed by specialists in skeletal trauma and osteoarthritis.
There are , many specimens of buried neanderthals that show the bodies to be free of the spondylitic effects on the skeletal masses and consequently these people walked normally upright in life, were these the odd ones. NO, Vendramini is caught mining the outliers, not thecore of the population.
FAirbanks had commented on Vendraminis Book and Vendramini used his quote as a sort of commendation of his(Vendramini's) work. Fairbanks said , and I paraphrase
"I read your book with great interest. I have to say that, if what you write is true, Im going to have to discard al that Ive been working on for the last 40 years"
If you pile up quotes like these one after another, I can see where someone would sorta be impressed. I think what Fairbanks was saying was that "Danny, you are so full of **** yer eyes are a deep brown"