@izzythepush,
Yes, paleolithic nutrition was published in the new England journal of medicine in 1985, by S. Boyd Eaton, meaning there is a scientific basis, Perhaps this is the same Eaton farmerman is referring to.
Prior to this, in 1975, a gastroentorologist published an arguement in favour of this concept.
Evidence does suggest that neolithic intervetion appears to be nutritionally dentrimental to human physiology, this entails my premise for the decreased efficiency of immune functionality.
Also, I do not agree with Sentata's arguement for a cultural basis, is there a genotypic, or phenotypic definition for the cultural application of fire?
It appears to be environmental, any phenotypic suggestion requires increased assumptions, hence may increase errors.
This may in fact be an
anthropormorphic fallacy.
Example:
Humans genetically flying =/= humans culturally flying
Humans genetically eating =/= humans culturally eating
Furthermore, I do not appeal to authority, this is fallicious, empirical suggestion is independent of induction.
Again, antecedent =/= consequent.
For clarificartion, being that we are arguing diet, we are arguing a genetic basis, NOT cultural.