1
   

Anti-racism may not always be good

 
 
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2012 02:41 pm
As with most ethical debates it tends to be assumed that if something is 'evil' its opposite must be entirely 'good'. the tyranny of racism is best defined in its customary way, as believing some 'racial' groups are inferior and may be subjugated or exterminated.
Those opposed may believe in equality and yet undermine ethnic - cultural and racial - diversity, by promoting the 'global village'. This is indeed happening as it has been for several hundred years - and in the past mere contact with Europeans has resulted in loss of whole 'nations' through disease. The third and altruistic choice, and most unlikely, is to promote ethnic diversity, in the way nature cultivated it over ten thousand years.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 1,131 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
Cycloptichorn
 
  2  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2012 02:43 pm
@RW Standing,
Quote:
As with most ethical debates it tends to be assumed that if something is 'evil' its opposite must be entirely 'good'.


Only by those who put zero thought into their arguments. The opposite of a problem is very rarely the solution to the problem.

Quote:
The third and altruistic choice, and most unlikely, is to promote ethnic diversity, in the way nature cultivated it over ten thousand years.


I don't understand what you are proposing here.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
fresco
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2012 03:13 pm
@RW Standing,
It is likely that racial prejudice is a genetic trait which we have in common with other primates. Intellectual antithesis to this may be merely a pipedream... a "Western philosophical position when times are good"... but history suggests it will ultimately tend to break down at the level of social competition for the earth's resources.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Tue 14 Feb, 2012 09:22 pm
@RW Standing,
Your remarks assume that "cultural and racial diversity" are laudable and to be strived for. The likely outcome of several more generations of intermarriage and cultural diffusion in a technologically sophisticated milieu will be that racial distinctions will no longer exist, and that cultural distinctions will be largely relegated to fields of entertainment or of scholarly inquiry. The Danes invaded England in the ninth century, and, despite their best efforts, failed in every attempt to obliterate the Saxons. Eventually, Canute of Denmark landed in Wessex, and after more than a year, succeeded in conquering England. He lasted for fewer than 20 years thereafter, and neither the English language nor Saxon culture perished during his reign. A little more than 30 years later, William the Bastard of Normandy successfully invaded and overran England, and no Saxon monarchy would ever rule there again.

But so what? The English language was enriched by its exposure to French, but in the end, the language of England remained English, and French faded away as an everyday language there. Culture certainly changed, and in many respects (governance, feudal relationships, commerce) it changed radically. I can see no good reason to condemn those cultural changes, as their eventual effect was to the benefit of the nation.

Should we mourn the lost post-Roman culture of the Britons? The Britons are still with us. Should we mourn the lost culture of the Anglo-Saxons? The Anglo-Saxons are still with us.

I think you protest too much. Very likely 'racial" intermarriage will obviate the one objection, and in the case of culture, the historical evidence, at least, is that culture is neither static nor worth eternally preserving.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

2016 moving to #1 spot - Discussion by gungasnake
Black Lives Matter - Discussion by TheCobbler
Is 'colored people' offensive? - Question by SMickey
Obama, a Joke - Discussion by coldjoint
The Day Ferguson Cops Were Caught in a Bloody Lie - Discussion by bobsal u1553115
The ECHR and muslims - Discussion by Arend
Atlanta Race Riot 1906 - Discussion by kobereal24
Quote of the Day - Discussion by Tabludama
The Confederacy was About Slavery - Discussion by snood
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Anti-racism may not always be good
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 12/21/2024 at 07:07:11