1
   

Afghanistan

 
 
pistoff
 
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2004 06:25 am
It all about natural gas and a pipleine. The Bush family was trying to negotiate this deal but it fell througha few days before 911. Then 911 was the excuse to kill the Taliban and Al Q. paving the way to install the pipeline and steal the natural gas.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 657 • Replies: 13
No top replies

 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2004 06:30 am
If it was all about oil and gas pipelines, why aren't they building them?
0 Replies
 
acepoly
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2004 06:49 am
Probably Bush's too busy with the election stuff right now, but he'll keep an eye on the oil deal Very Happy
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2004 06:53 am
Uh...a war
There's a war going on and it does take money to build the piple line and dig for the gas.

Google Afganistan pipeline.

Check it out for yourself.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2004 06:54 am
Looks like the election campaign's have begun early on both sides of the pacific. Let's hope the right wing pricks get hammered both here and there. What a lead in to next christmas that would be.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2004 09:08 am
Pistoff

I'm in no doubt getting oil and gas from the Caspian littoral states out to the Arabian sea via Afghanistan had a lot to do with the invasion of that country. But we've had the war, the Taliban are gone. American troops control the line of the proposed pipeline from Turkmenistan via Herat and Kandahar. Why aren't we building it?
0 Replies
 
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2004 10:59 am
The taliban are not gone. Just days a go a canadian solider in Kabul was killed in a suicide bombing. Threats were sent afterwards stating it was 'only the begining'. Many recent events in Afghanistan prove the taliban is very much in existence.
The land in Afghanistan is littered with landmines, terrorists and transportation nightmares. There a million reasons why oil and gas production has not begun breaking ground. That doesn't mean the paper work hasn't been filed.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3432587.stm
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2004 11:33 am
Its more than the paperwork done:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=127&ncid=742&e=7&u=/uclicktext/20040108/cm_ucru/pipedreams
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2004 04:33 pm
Ceili wrote:
The taliban are not gone. Just days a go a canadian solider in Kabul was killed in a suicide bombing. Threats were sent afterwards stating it was 'only the begining'. Many recent events in Afghanistan prove the taliban is very much in existence.
The land in Afghanistan is littered with landmines, terrorists and transportation nightmares. There a million reasons why oil and gas production has not begun breaking ground. That doesn't mean the paper work hasn't been filed.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/3432587.stm


Yup!
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2004 04:53 pm
The Plan
Is it just a coincidence?

"The Karzai government in Kabul--headed by a former consultant to Unocal, the oil company that originally pitched TAP to the Taliban in 1995--can't possibly make good on its assurance."

Nothing else matters to the Neo Fascists, the PNAC crowd except that pipleline. That's what the troops are dying and getting maimed for. It makes me wonder if those troops now that.

Does anyone really think that there will be any other person other than Karzai that will be elected Pres. of Afghanistan?
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2004 04:59 pm
Mr O B Laden?
0 Replies
 
pistoff
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2004 05:19 pm
Osama
If his name was on the ballot he would probably win.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2004 05:46 pm
I bet the Reynolds company loves you, Pistoff.
0 Replies
 
unknown man
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Feb, 2004 06:21 pm
I'm suprised the US hasn't already set up a puppet government.
Most likely, who ever is on that ballot will be pre-approved by our government though. The Bush administration can't afford to have someone elected taht they don't have some sort of sway over. And certanitly they don't want an extremist running the country. Who ever it is will need US backing, but will the people of Afghanistan chose someone who is US backed?
Most likely the same troubles will pop up in Iraq.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Afghanistan
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 01:36:38