1
   

New Concern Is Expressed About Flights From Abroad

 
 
au1929
 
Reply Sat 31 Jan, 2004 10:19 am
New Concern Is Expressed About Flights From Abroad

By ERIC LICHTBLAU

Published: January 31, 2004

WASHINGTON, Jan. 30 — American officials said on Friday that they had received new information in recent days pointing to the possibility of an international hijacking and were considering the grounding of several flights from England and France over the weekend as a result.
Officials said terrorist intelligence that they considered "specific and credible" raised particular concerns about British Airways flights from London to Washington and Air France flights. Officials would not disclose the Air France flights but said they were not on the Paris-to-Los Angeles route on which flights were grounded in December.
"It's very similar to what we saw over the Christmas and New Year's holidays, and a repeat of that situation — with the cancellation of some flights — is a high probability," a law enforcement official said.
There were no cancellations as of Friday night, officials said.
At the end of December, United States officials became so alarmed about the threat of an international hijacking that they raised the nation's threat status to "orange," or high risk. Numerous flights into and out of the United States on British Airways, Air France and Aeromexico were canceled or subjected to extraordinary security measures. One flight from Mexico City to Los Angeles turned around in mid-flight because American officials were not satisfied that passengers and baggage had been properly screened.
The threat level was lowered on Jan. 9 to "yellow."
This week, a "re-scrubbing" of intelligence gleaned from the orange alert, along with new intelligence developed from an informant, again raised the specter of an international aviation attack, the law enforcement official said. The threats, corroborated by other sources, including information on specific flights.
"We remain concerned," said Brian Roehrkasse, a spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security, "about Al Qaeda's desire to target aviation, especially international aviation." But he said there were no plans to elevate the threat status.


Will these "threats" become more and more frequent as the election comes closer ? IMO the only thing Bush has going for him is the "war on terrorism". Are these alerts real or the administrations way of keeping the population focused upon it?.
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 638 • Replies: 10
No top replies

 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jan, 2004 10:45 am
Or maybe "specific and credible" threats are being generated in an attempt to discredit the administration? It is hard to see disruption of international commerce and travel as a great big plus.
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jan, 2004 10:50 am
roger wrote:
Or maybe "specific and credible" threats are being generated in an attempt to discredit the administration?


roger, exactly what kind of horseshit accusation is this?
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jan, 2004 10:55 am
It is no more an accusation than:
au1929 wrote:

Will these "threats" become more and more frequent as the election comes closer ? IMO the only thing Bush has going for him is the "war on terrorism". Are these alerts real or the administrations way of keeping the population focused upon it?.
, and exactly as well based.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jan, 2004 10:57 am
roger
IMO this administration is capable of any subterfuge and underhanded action. they have no floor beyond which they will not sink.
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jan, 2004 11:15 am
I agree, as a matter of fact. That doesn't go far towards proving that the most vile explanation of any given fact is the correct one.

We now have two interpretations of a news item. Either one could be correct. Some would even take it at face value. That could also be correct.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Sat 31 Jan, 2004 10:03 pm
I think that if they really wanted to be sneaky and underhanded, they would have planted WMD's in Iraq, NOT spend time calling in prank calls to the airlines.

You really need to think bigger with the conspiracies...
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Feb, 2004 09:16 am
McGentrix

Quote:
I think that if they really wanted to be sneaky and underhanded, they would have planted WMD's in Iraq, NOT spend time calling in prank calls to the airlines
.

I have little doubt that if the thought they could get away with it they would have. When it comes to being deceitful and underhanded this administration has no equal.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Feb, 2004 10:46 am
Riiiight...it's the Bush administration that will be remembered for the lies it told...uh, huh.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Feb, 2004 11:01 am
McGentrix
What they will be remembered for are the body bags, as well as wounded and maimed American service people coming back from an unnecessary and ill conceived war based upon a mountain of lies.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Sun 1 Feb, 2004 11:42 am
No, it will more likely be remembered as the presidency that brought democratic reform to the middle east. History is a very fickle mistress.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » New Concern Is Expressed About Flights From Abroad
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 10/01/2024 at 06:31:57