1
   

Deadly Australia.

 
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2004 04:18 pm
A "wallabie" is a mis-spelling for "wallaby".

These are some wallabies:



http://www.sch.im/wlp/large%20images/parma%20wallaby.jpg

http://www.kzu.ch/fach/gg/welt/ki/picts/wallaby.jpg

http://www.rhrwildlife.com/theanimals/w/wallabybennetts/images/wallaby.jpg


You would have to be very unlucky to get seriously hurt by the wildlife here.

If you are out in the wilds, read about reasonable precautions - re snakes for instance. Like - don't walk in the bush without solid boots on.
Don't, if in the far tropical north, where there are crocodiles, swim where the signs clearly tell you not to.

Travel books and local guides should tell you about any dangers.

Almost nobody dies from local fauna. Bees and such are the most dnagerous animals here - just as they are in the US.

Threads like these were mainly set up to tease the Australians on the site.
0 Replies
 
USAMeg
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2004 04:37 pm
Rolling Eyes Hmm is that the correct expression for feeling sheepish??

I thought the bottom two pictures were kangaroo?

thanks for humoring a dumb foreigner:)
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2004 04:55 pm
Wallabies are quite similar to kangaroos - as well as some taxonomic differences, they are generally smaller.

How have you been dumb?

The animals described on this thread do, generally (I am unsure if - other than the two-finned land shark, any non-real animals have entered the thread - hint - neither drop-bears, not kangarillas exist - but Ozzians like to tease furriners with them) exist. It is just that their dangers are exaggerated in terms of your likelihood of running into them!


If you DID run into them, and they felt snappish (snakes and spiders and such generally just freeze or run - but you never know) it would be nasty - other country's animals always seem worse than your own, though, because they are unfamiliar.

I am afeered of grizzlies, meself!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Thu 29 Jul, 2004 05:22 pm
That's why i have this grizzly ward on my front door all the time . . . and i can assure you, no grizzly has ever been seen in this apartment complex . . .
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 12:05 am
http://www.outback-info.de/australien/kangaroo.htm

Lot's of info about Kangaroos and Wallabies.
0 Replies
 
Montana
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 12:17 am
Welcome back sweetie pie ;-)
0 Replies
 
USAMeg
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 10:01 am
Wilso - Oh I don't know, I guess it's just hard to tell when people are teasing over the computer! I get it now though -- and you're totally right, other countries' animals are always more intimidating. See case in point... I've lived here all my life and never seen a bear. People have in wooded residential areas on rare occasions even in my home state, but attacks are even more rare. I think they'd also run away rather than do anything else, just stay away from their cubs or else you're toast. I guess Australia just has this wildlife reputation... that's why Aussies are considered to be tougher than most.

It's damn good to know that snakes & spiders generally run away... !

I can't wait to come to Oz!
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 10:10 am
Be wary of advice from the Wabbit all you'll get is . . .














. . . addled aid . . .













heeheeheeheeheeheeheeheehee . . .

i crack me up


okbye
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 11:51 am
The koala tea of Mersey is not strained.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 12:20 pm
That's the spirit ! ! !
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 12:50 pm
Mertze.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Fri 30 Jul, 2004 12:51 pm
Gesundheit.





damn it, rabbit, its an aural tradition.
0 Replies
 
margo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Aug, 2004 01:21 am
Here are some more dangerous Wallabies:
http://www.abc.net.au/rugbyunion/galleries/tri-nation2/images/01.jpg
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Aug, 2004 02:50 am
Margo's alive!!!!

(And it's oral, Patio.........teehee)
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Aug, 2004 05:18 am
Oral can be confused with something licentious, whereas aural -- short of the conjugal visit the Lord God paid to the Virgin Mary or that Zeus paid to some ear canal -- cannot. And you cannot have an oral tradition without an aural tradition -- unless you are a member of Parliament. Or Funkadelic.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Aug, 2004 06:17 am
Can too.
0 Replies
 
patiodog
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Aug, 2004 07:53 am
Well, okay, there is the Joe Orton book, too...

http://www.ucpress.edu/books/pages/images/9220.jpg
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Aug, 2004 09:17 am
Who you calling an ear?


You p
















































uppy.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Beached As Bro - Discussion by dadpad
Oz election thread #3 - Rudd's Labour - Discussion by msolga
Australian music - Discussion by Wilso
Oz Election Thread #6 - Abbott's LNP - Discussion by hingehead
AUstralian Philosophers - Discussion by dadpad
Australia voting system - Discussion by fbaezer
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Deadly Australia.
  3. » Page 4
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 09:52:17