43
   

I just don’t understand drinking and driving

Forums: Drinking And Driving, Dui, Manslaughter, Thom Swift, Barry Lancaster
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
jcboy
 
  1  
Reply Fri 20 Jan, 2012 10:23 pm
@Bootlace,
Are you from St. Pete? Just asking.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jan, 2012 01:21 pm
@jcboy,
jcboy wrote:
Are you from St. Pete? Just asking.
R u near Disneyworld, Morgan ?
If I lived nearby, I 'd enjoy it ofen.





David
Ragman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 21 Jan, 2012 01:38 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
St. Pete is 100+ miles or 1:45 hour drive approx . from Orlando, FL. Stating the obvious, FL is a huge state.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Sun 22 Jan, 2012 03:50 am
@Ragman,
Ragman wrote:
St. Pete is 100+ miles or 1:45 hour drive approx . from Orlando, FL. Stating the obvious, FL is a huge state.
I see; thank u, Ragman.
It woud pay to remain there over nite; spend a few days there.
I imagine that Antonio 'd enjoy that.

I did, at the end of 2OOO; 'twas fun.





David
0 Replies
 
Tate12
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 09:01 pm
So, is Thom next hearing date next Monday, January 30?
Sloan
 
  1  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 09:12 pm
@Tate12,
Not really following his case. Are you Tater?
0 Replies
 
Wildhourses
 
  0  
Reply Mon 23 Jan, 2012 09:20 pm
@Tate12,
Sure didn't take long for that nosey bitch to show up.
EqualityFLSTPete
 
  3  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2012 06:32 am
@Wildhourses,
Be nice Joe, that may not be Tater.

I've heard Thom goes to court on Monday. Probably won't hear what happens thou, we'll see.
hawkeye10
 
  2  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2012 10:46 am
@EqualityFLSTPete,
Given the so many locals know about this thread I certainly hope that someone gives us the 411.
EqualityFLSTPete
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2012 10:53 am
@hawkeye10,
Oh I'm sure someone will, they can't keep secrets for very long in this town :0
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2012 05:07 pm
@EqualityFLSTPete,
EqualityFLSTPete wrote:

Oh I'm sure someone will, they can't keep secrets for very long in this town :0

The functioning of our justice system should not be in secret...it should practice transparancy but does not, a point that I have made before.
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2012 06:03 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
The functioning of our justice system should not be in secret...it should practice transparancy but does not, a point that I have made before.

And, as before, you are wrong in claiming that the judicial system functions in secret. Swift's court hearings have all been held in an open public courtroom.
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2012 06:08 pm
@firefly,
And yet Pete indicates through his choice of words that what will happen next Monday will be a secret.......
firefly
 
  1  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2012 06:11 pm
@hawkeye10,
Pete simply indicated that news spreads in the community, he wasn't saying the court hearing would be secret. It is on the court calender for the 30th--as I previously posted in this thread. There is nothing secret about it.
hawkeye10
 
  0  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2012 07:43 pm
@firefly,
firefly wrote:

Pete simply indicated that news spreads in the community, he wasn't saying the court hearing would be secret. It is on the court calender for the 30th--as I previously posted in this thread. There is nothing secret about it.


It is highly doubtful thaat Pete used the word "secret" by mistake...word choice matters, and you don't have the right to ignore his choice of words until and unless he tells you that he screwwed up his attempt at communication.
firefly
 
  2  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2012 07:50 pm
@hawkeye10,
Swift's court hearing on the 30th is definitely not secret. I posted about it earlier in this thread and I also reported some of what took place at his earlier hearings. The information is available, there is nothing secret about it.

jcboy
 
  2  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2012 07:52 pm
@firefly,
That’s true! I heard Thom goes to court on Monday, haven’t talked to many lately about Thom’s legal troubles. After some of the posts on here he’s been very careful whom he talks to. Probably a good thing. I’m sure though I’ll get a text message Monday evening.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2012 09:12 pm
@hawkeye10,
firefly wrote:
Pete simply indicated that news spreads in the community, he wasn't saying the court hearing would be secret. It is on the court calender for the 30th--as I previously posted in this thread. There is nothing secret about it.
hawkeye10 wrote:
It is highly doubtful thaat Pete used the word "secret" by mistake...word choice matters, and
you don't have the right to ignore his choice of words until and unless
he tells you that he screwwed up his attempt at communication.
Geeez, Hawkeye!? What happened to my right to ignore???





David
hawkeye10
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2012 10:30 pm
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
Geeez, Hawkeye!? What happened to my right to ignore???


Nothing, what we are talking about here is Firefly's habit of redefining words to her liking, in this case in order to pretend that someone said something other than what they clearly said. She and you do not have the right to ignore what the speaker is clearly attempting to say. Now if Pete wants to come around and say that he picked his words poorly then we can revisit the issue.
ehBeth
 
  2  
Reply Tue 24 Jan, 2012 11:12 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawkeye10 wrote:
we we


remember - you don't approve of posters speaking for anyone but themselves unless they're authorized

http://able2know.org/topic/183506-2#post-4870917

hawkeye10 wrote:

It is not possible for him to be speaking for more then himself unless he has been authorized to speak for others. Until and unless that authorization is presented he is in fact not speaking for anyone but himself. There is nothing to debate here.


******* mr. mouse in his pocket

 

Related Topics

Can a thread be removed or locked? - Question by BeachBoy
dui - Question by sylvia chomas
Drinking and Driving Tip.... - Discussion by Slappy Doo Hoo
 
  1. Forums
  2. » I just don’t understand drinking and driving
  3. » Page 74
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 02/12/2025 at 02:53:32
▲ ▼