dlowan wrote:McGentrix - are you saying that Powell and Cheney were NOT in top decision-making positions for the period of Saddam's worst atrocities, the massacre and gassing of the Kurds in 1988 and the crushing of the Shiite rebellion in 1991 that might have overthrown him?
I actully do not know the answer, and thus far you have not actually contested the truth of the assertion - just pfffft'd at the source. I am interested to know.
I am sure that if you really cared, you can look up the details just as well as I can.
My "pfft" is directed at the context in which Chomsky uses these examples as the be all and end all at the time.
Things like
Quote:"The Bush administration has openly declared its intention to dismantle what remained of the system of world order and to rule the world by force, with Iraq as a demonstration project."
doesn't really help me want to admire Chomsky...
Rumsfeld was indeed an envoy to the middle east and Iraq. The US was facing a far greater enemy at the time and tough choices had to be made. Our country was stronger as a result of those decisions. Blame the UN for the crushing of the Shiite rebellion. They were the ones who told the US not to interfere.
One thing for sure, Hussein won't be doing any of those things again, now will he?