Verbally abusing someone when you can keep your mouth shut is an action. Insulting someone, offending others, is an action that you don't need to engage in. You wouldn't put up with it at work, so why would you put up with it on the street?
If what they are doing is a crime then charge them with that crime, but dont throw in a kicker penalty because you decide that the transgression was motivated by an natural human emotion that you dont like....or beliefs about race that you dont like. To do so is as David points out nothing but bullying of the citizens by the government.
Bullying with NO authority
the hate law is enacted with STOLEN
, fake jurisdiction.
The concept that government has jurisdiction over what citizens THINK
is very liberal (meaning deviant
to fundamental Americanism.
It was rock-bottom ethos of the 17OOs in America that the territory
between the ears in any citizen is IMMUNE
from jurisdiction of government.
(Even the King
did not claim THAT
The liberals have expanded jurisdiction, at the expense of personal liberty.
Some criminals in poor states of mental health (e.g., Andrea Yates)
have committed murder while thinking thawts of love for their victims.
Correspondingly, the liberals shoud award them nicer, sweeter sentences; call it the "Love Crimes Law".
think loving thawts
while doing their criminal deeds, shoud the penal law
be amended to grant them easier penalties?? I think not.