@RABEL222,
RABEL222 wrote:More of your stupid bullshit. The constitution should be interpreted as it was wrote. Where in the Constitution does it say corporations are people. This is just political bullshit that the supreme court decided for the rich man in order to repay them for the money spent on republican politicians. You can say what you want but in my opinion your opinion is bullshit. The supreme court is politicized 5 repbs to 3 dems and one in the center.
I shoud point out that in
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the USSC
was merely
restoring the
status quo ante;
it was
NOT coming up with anything new.
The USSC restored & preserved the old paradigm, that has been accepted for centuries.
On the contrary, the "campaign finance law"
raped the First Amendment 4 different ways;
IT was the
aberration, correctly rejected by the USSC.
It was
facially, conspicuously unConstitutional, most
egregiously violating the First Amendment.
Indeed, under the old Constitutional scheme,
IF it were necessary to tolerate bribery
in order to protect Freedom of Speech, then Freedom of Speech
woud prevail and we 'd accept bribery, because Congress
has no authority to amend the Bill of Rights
without ratification of 3/4 of all of the States.
Any statute (e.g., the bribery statute) is inferior to
and subordinate to the Constitution itself.
The only reason that a statute has the force
of law is that it is so provided in the Constitution,
which is the Supreme Law of the Land.
As it has been for centuries,
bribery can still be criminally prosecuted,
as it has always been, but what
is MORE IMPORTANT: FREE SPEECH WILL PREVAIL OVER EVERYTHING
( except the citizen 's right to keep and bear arms ).
David
Stumble It!
Tweet This
Bookmark on Delicious
Share on Facebook
Share on MySpace