1
   

Amid Boeing flap, House approves bill to rein in labor agency

 
 
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2011 09:31 am
September 15, 2011
Amid Boeing flap, House approves bill to rein in labor agency
By James Rosen | McClatchy Newspapers

WASHINGTON — The House of Representatives on Thursday passed Republican legislation to place new limits on the chief federal labor agency in response to its bid to prevent Boeing from running a jet-manufacturing plant in South Carolina.

The 238-186 vote fell primarily along party lines. The vote, which would restrict actions of the National Labor Relations Board, was preceded by almost two hours of often passionate debate on the House floor, with Republicans accusing Democrats of stifling job growth and Democrats accusing Republicans of killing workers' rights.

Eight Democratic lawmakers broke ranks and joined 230 Republicans in voting for the bill. All came from right-to-work states like South Carolina that prohibit requiring union membership as a condition of employment, among them Reps. Mike McIntyre and Heath Shuler of North Carolina, John Barrow of Georgia and Henry Cuellar of Texas.

Seven Republican House members also broke ranks to vote with 179 Democrats against the measure, including Reps. Michael Fitzpatrick and Pat Meehan of Pennsylvania, and Don Young of Alaska.

While the Protecting Jobs from Government Interference Act is expected to die in the Democratic-controlled Senate, its House passage is a major legislative victory for Rep. Tim Scott, a first-term South Carolina Republican whose coastal congressional district is home to the new Boeing plant.

"Today's vote is important for our entire nation as well as for my home district in South Carolina, where the NLRB is currently pursuing an agenda which, if successful, would kill thousands of jobs," Scott said.

Rep. Jay Inslee, a Washington state Democrat, said he hasn't taken a position on the dispute between Boeing, a major employer in his state, and the machinists union, which represents thousands of workers at the aerospace giant's factories there.

Inslee, though, criticized GOP lawmakers for trying to interfere with the work of an independent federal agency.

"The NLRB is a law-enforcement body," Inslee said. "Elected officials should not be politicizing an ongoing judicial process."

An NLRB administrative law judge in Seattle is weighing the case. It started in April when Lafe Solomon, the agency's top lawyer, filed a complaint citing evidence that Boeing built the North Charleston, S.C., plant to retaliate against its Washington state union workers for past strikes.

Defying the regulatory action, Boeing opened the factory in June and is starting to make 787 Dreamliner planes there to fill what it says is a large backorder from airlines that already have bought the cutting-edge jets and are awaiting delivery.

The dispute could take a year or longer to resolve as it moves to the full National Labor Relations Board, and then through the federal courts on likely appeal from whichever side loses in the agency's ruling.

Read more: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2011/09/15/124237/anti-nlrb-bill-moves-through-house.html#ixzz1Y8701SmQ
  • Topic Stats
  • Top Replies
  • Link to this Topic
Type: Discussion • Score: 1 • Views: 477 • Replies: 3
No top replies

 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2011 09:41 am
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
The NLRB action against Boeing is unprecedented. It is based on the theory that Boeing indended to retaliate against the union by building a plant in a Right to work state. It is a novel theory in that intent alone is usually not considered a crime. Crimes are embedded in specific actions. There is nothing illegal in building a factory in a right to work state. The workers in South Carolina will be entirely free to join the Machinists union if they wish to do so. The problem for labor unions is that whenever workers are given a free choice they almost always choose not to join a union. No surprise here. Given a choice most victims of Mafia "protection" rackets would choose to opt out if they had the ability to do so without risk.
BumbleBeeBoogie
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2011 09:46 am
@georgeob1,
Why did I think you would object to the union's actions? Shocked

But you are consistent. Smile

BBB

georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Sep, 2011 10:31 am
@BumbleBeeBoogie,
So are you Dear.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Amid Boeing flap, House approves bill to rein in labor agency
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 09/28/2024 at 08:29:04