Palestinian Solidarity Campaign disrupts Israeli Concert. Yeah!!!

This is exactly what i'm talking about when i say your sick, twisted world. Because acknowledging the deaths of Palestinian children would contradict your world view, you just deny it happens.

You trot out your bullshit about "code words" and collateral damage.

I see you failed entirely to address the wanton, irresponsible and murderous use of cluster bombs in the Lebanon by the IDF.

Basically, your thesis is that anything which contradicts you can't be true.

he's just a racist ****.

300 Children Killed in Gaza

The source is the Voice of America.

Gaza: The children killed in a war the world doesn't want to know about

The source is the Independent newspaper in the United Kingdom.

At least 14 children killed in Gaza terror as Israel defies demands for a ceasefire

The source is the Daily Mail newspaper in the United Kingdom.

Dozens killed in Lebanon air raid

Quote:

More than 54 civilians, at least 34 of them children, have been killed in a town in south Lebanon in the deadliest Israeli strike of the conflict so far.

The source is the British Broadcasting Corporation.

Children die in convoy attack as Israel widens Lebanon assault

The source is the Guadian newspaper in the United Kingdom.

I checked all of the links to make sure they work before i posted it, so don't try that dodge. I have no doubt that what we'll see now is you attempting to allege that these are not reliable sources.

See, this basically you saying "Nope." The firestorm witnessed by American POWs began in the daytime, after the RAF bombing mission had been completed, after the firestorms caused by their bombing had burnt out.

The RAF did not bomb the city center.

I agree with your assessment, but we are not the only people who read here, so i have provided sources which i am sure he will now deny.

Either that or he'll puke up some more of his collateral damage bullshit, as though that justifies wanton attacks such as the IDF perpetrates. If they can't launch their attacks without killing hundreds of children, they're pretty ******* incompetent.

You've demonstrated your true colors, you've demonstrated you inability to acknowledge facts if they conflict with your political prejudices,

you've demonstrated your callous indifference to the deaths of chilren who aren't Israeli.

Is there anyone in America who doesn't know Mel Brooks is Jewish? Similarly Gerald Kaufman makes great play of the fact he is Jewish, and lost relatives in Auswitch. You're looking for something that's not there.

Foofie wrote:

Also, if there was a Palestinean state, what will the economy be based on? Welfare from the world?

At the moment the Gaza blockade is making any form of industry nigh on impossible. Allow them to trade like any other nation and I'm sure they'll do very well thank you very much.

BTW lecturing people about political correctness, whilst carping on about the superiority of certain races, is a textbook example of a 'Foofieism.'

Nice try (not), and typical of your bullshit. When Israeli helicopter gun ships and tanks fire into Gaza and children are killed, that is every bit as horrific as the death of any Israeli child. When the IDF litters the Lebanese landscape with cluster bombs and children are killed, that is every bit as horrific as the death of any Israeli child. You have a sick, twisted mind when you attempt to allege that the only Palestinian children killed are child soldiers. You truly disgust me.

I agree with your assessment, but we are not the only people who read here, so i have provided sources which i am sure he will now deny. Either that or he'll puke up some more of his collateral damage bullshit, as though that justifies wanton attacks such as the IDF perpetrates. If they can't launch their attacks without killing hundreds of children, they're pretty ******* incompetent.

What seems to be overlooked is that modern warfare has included killing civilians as a way to demoralize the enemy. So, Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki is the modern paradigm of war. It was used by an enemy on 9/11. It was used, I thought, also during the Spanish Civil War in the 1930's.

Foofie wrote:

What seems to be overlooked is that modern warfare has included killing civilians as a way to demoralize the enemy. So, Dresden, Hiroshima, Nagasaki is the modern paradigm of war. It was used by an enemy on 9/11. It was used, I thought, also during the Spanish Civil War in the 1930's.

You're not comparing like with like. Dresden Hiroshima and Nagasaki were all events at the end of WW2, and there was a sense of retribution. 9/11 was a criminal act. If you look at NATO action in Libya there is a clear sense of avoiding civilians, and focusing on military targets. Israel purports to hold itself to the same high standards, but when you look at the amount of civilian dead in Lebanon and Gaza that is clearly not the case

Meanwhile, Brooklyn and Queens just elected a Republican (Bob Turner) to replace Anthony Weiner. The first time in eons that a Republican took the district. It was meant to be a referendum of discontent with Obama's Israel policy, his policies economically, and his policy towards gay marriage.

In a major upset for President Obama's party, voters in New York's ninth district chose a 70-year-old Catholic businessman with little political experience, over a 56-year-old Orthodox Jew, who a few years ago would have been a shoo-in.