So Pissed Off

I think that's a good point.
It's really not necessary for a journalist to martyr their self in order to pin someone down.

What exactly do you mean by "banana republic"?

You've just reiterated what I said. The idea, maybe the word, ideal, is better, is that the US follow the rule of law.

Welcome to Respect Holidays

Welcome to the Respect Holidays website, your one-stop shop for the very best gay cheap holidays to the Mediterranean and the Canary Islands.

This site is dead easy to navigate around – the menu at the top of this page is self explanatory and, if you need to get back to this home page, just click on the impossibly sexy six-pack in the top left corner of every page.

With detailed resort descriptions and all the facts and figures about every single property featured by Respect, you’ll find everything you need at the click of a mouse. And if you’re thinking of travelling in the next few weeks, check out our bargain Late Offers pages for Thomson Holidays discount codes where there are all sorts of bargains to be found. Don't forget to check for discount codes at Coupon Croc first, for bargain holiday prices.

If you’re looking for a travelling companion, want to find out more about a particular holiday from a fellow Respect customer or if you want to exchange views about the wonderful world of gay holidaymaking, then feel free to log on to the Respect messageboard. The board has often heralded the start of some beautiful friendships among the Respect community, so make sure you don’t miss out.

Tolerance is a virtue, but forcing people to be over-acceptant is wrong.

So I'm watching a post Ames one on one with Michelle Bachmann and they address her views on atheists and gays showing her ON VIDEO expressing them from HER OWN LIPS.. She is then asked would you appoint a gay or atheist to a cabinet position or supreme court. Of course because her handlers know they must soon start moving her towards the middle if she has any chance of getting the nomination (which I don't believe she does) she is trying to backpeddle and soften her basically primitive fundamentalist rhetoric.

She answers the question "I would appoint strict constitutionalists" which in itself is open to interpretation and certainly subjective.Okay,fair enough. No harm, no foul. Then she adds to that it has to be people who share her viewpoint. When asked again specifically about whether she would appoint atheists or gays she fires back with that exact scripted answer.

Here's what pisses me off. If they just ran VIDEO of her talking about how everything needs to be Christ centered and how gays and atheists are basically just a breath away from the fires of hell at any given moment then OBVIOUSLY those people don't share her view and no chance they could ever be appointed to a damn thing or have ANY sort of voice in her administration. So she answered the question while hiding her answer from the public she's trying to hoodwink. WHY didn't the interviewer take that opportunity to state the obvious and make her say in a one word simple answer that if she won't appoint people who don't share her view then she HAS answered the question and the answer is just plain "No. No chance." Why can't these interviewers from both the right and the left, but more so the ones on the left show some damn sack and used the bully pulpit of GLOBAL television to make these people get to the damn point?

Sorry for the rambling rant. I just can't believe that every one word answer is disguised in 100 obfuscating words and these assholes are allowed to get a pass for it. In fairness, Bachmann of course isn't the only one, this comes from both sides of the political fence.