RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 5 Jul, 2012 04:16 am
Scientists at Cern are confident they have found the 'God particle', but months and years of analysis lie ahead
https://apps.facebook.com/theguardian/science/2012/jul/04/higgs-boson-discovery-real-work
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Mon 9 Jul, 2012 06:18 am
Scientists say NASA’s 2010 ‘new form of life’ claim was untrue
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/09/scientists-say-nasas-2010-new-form-of-life-claim-was-untrue/
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2012 01:53 pm
https://sphotos-b.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-snc7/308056_538813999477365_34828902_n.jpg
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Thu 25 Apr, 2013 11:17 pm
Archaeopteryx
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archaeopteryx
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Fri 10 May, 2013 01:44 pm
SCIENTISTS PROVE DNA CAN BE REPROGRAMMED BY WORDS AND FREQUENCIES
http://blindfoldofficial.blogspot.com/2013/05/scientist-prove-dna-can-be-reprogrammed.html

Words and frequencies from the earth and sun...
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 12 May, 2013 01:13 pm
https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/941602_464034723672028_1027361069_n.jpg
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sat 20 Jul, 2013 11:56 pm
Biggest Virus Yet Found, May Be Fourth Domain of Life?
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/07/130718-viruses-pandoraviruses-science-biology-evolution
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 25 Aug, 2013 02:10 pm
https://sphotos-b-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/1170820_384683491654388_1206182370_n.jpg
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 31 Dec, 2013 07:22 am
What lies beneath: Tiny organisms thrive below Earth's surface
http://www.nbcnews.com/science/what-lies-beneath-tiny-organisms-thrive-below-earths-surface-2D11820133
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sat 18 Jan, 2014 02:43 pm
"Paleontologists led by Prof Neil Shubin from the University of Chicago have discovered unique fossils of Tiktaalik roseae – the most compelling example yet of a creature that was at the cusp of the fish-tetrapod transition. The fossilized pelves and a pelvic fin of Tiktaalik roseae reveal that the evolution of hind legs actually began as enhanced hind fins, according to the scientists. This challenges existing theory that large, mobile hind appendages were developed only after vertebrates transitioned to land..." Read the Sci-News article: http://ow.ly/sB0in Read the NPR News article: http://ow.ly/sB0rh

Image Credit: Kalliopi Monoyios/PNAS

https://scontent-a-iad.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t1/p403x403/1530312_10152115081880155_459855579_n.jpg


I thought I would add this other link below to the one above.

Master of disguise! Uroplatus phantasticus is a species of gecko indigenous to the island of Madagascar.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash3/995280_746247548726365_1298553170_n.jpg


0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Wed 29 Jan, 2014 10:22 am
How Farming Reshaped Our Genomes
http://news.sciencemag.org/archaeology/2014/01/how-farming-reshaped-our-genomes
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Apr, 2014 04:03 am
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 May, 2014 12:05 am
Some thoughts, the thing that comes out of the sun, we call it sunlight. Well this is the seeds for all life.

Sunlight is the seed of life and the sun plants this life in the earth's soil. The earth is made of sunlight completely, billions of tons of sunlight. Our earth's matter is compressed of nearly all sunlight. The sun uses geometry and gravity to manipulate chemistry into complex structures and DNA. The sun creates biologically dependent things that replicate because the sun's particles have energy deep within them.

Chemical structures become dependent upon this sunlight. An atom is much like the human eye.

Wherever there is a sun there is life that is being radiated out to its planets.
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Sun 11 May, 2014 12:56 am
@RexRed,
Could you possibly just state your thesis simply in a short paragraph?
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2014 08:59 am
Origin of life: Stanley Miller’s forgotten experiments, analyzed
http://richarddawkins.net/2014/06/origin-of-life-stanley-millers-forgotten-experiments-analyzed/
0 Replies
 
Brandon9000
 
  2  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2014 09:25 am
What scientists suspect is that after a billion years of random chemical reactions in the oceans, finally a molecule formed which could make copies of itself (much, much simpler than DNA).
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2014 09:51 am
@Brandon9000,
Brandon9000 wrote:

What scientists suspect is that after a billion years of random chemical reactions in the oceans, finally a molecule formed which could make copies of itself (much, much simpler than DNA).


If light can be in two places at once it seem natural it would pass that inherent trait on to matter.

The photon's tendencies to pop in and out of existence is the rudiments of reproduction.
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2014 10:32 am
@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:

What scientists suspect is that after a billion years of random chemical reactions in the oceans, finally a molecule formed which could make copies of itself (much, much simpler than DNA).


If light can be in two places at once it seem natural it would pass that inherent trait on to matter.

The photon's tendencies to pop in and out of existence is the rudiments of reproduction.

Why do you think that light can be in two places at once? Nothing can be in two places at once. Something can have a probability of different locations, but that isn't the same as being in two places at once.

How do photons spontaneously appearing cause microbes to appear on Earth? What is the mechanism which takes one phenomenon and creates the other phenomenon from it?
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2014 11:34 am
@Brandon9000,
Brandon9000 wrote:

RexRed wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:

What scientists suspect is that after a billion years of random chemical reactions in the oceans, finally a molecule formed which could make copies of itself (much, much simpler than DNA).


If light can be in two places at once it seem natural it would pass that inherent trait on to matter.

The photon's tendencies to pop in and out of existence is the rudiments of reproduction.

Why do you think that light can be in two places at once? Nothing can be in two places at once. Something can have a probability of different locations, but that isn't the same as being in two places at once.

How do photons spontaneously appearing cause microbes to appear on Earth? What is the mechanism which takes one phenomenon and creates the other phenomenon from it?


Since light is on such a quantized scale, matter emulates its properties.

If light can't be in two places at once how can light be both a wave and a particle at the same time?

I am just saying that matter takes on the properties of its parent (light).

Human parents their DNA come together to form one person who have the traits of both parents at once.

Therefore a parent is both in their own body and represented in the body of a sibling at the same time.
Brandon9000
 
  1  
Reply Sat 28 Jun, 2014 11:59 am
@RexRed,
RexRed wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:

RexRed wrote:

Brandon9000 wrote:

What scientists suspect is that after a billion years of random chemical reactions in the oceans, finally a molecule formed which could make copies of itself (much, much simpler than DNA).


If light can be in two places at once it seem natural it would pass that inherent trait on to matter.

The photon's tendencies to pop in and out of existence is the rudiments of reproduction.

Why do you think that light can be in two places at once? Nothing can be in two places at once. Something can have a probability of different locations, but that isn't the same as being in two places at once.

How do photons spontaneously appearing cause microbes to appear on Earth? What is the mechanism which takes one phenomenon and creates the other phenomenon from it?


Since light is on such a quantized scale, matter emulates its properties.

Please cite your source.

RexRed wrote:
If light can't be in two places at once how can light be both a wave and a particle at the same time?

Well, if you'd bothered to actually check out the literature, you'd know that the conventional interpretation is that light has only one nature and it's our comparison to objects familiar to our daily lives which causes it to seem to have two natures.

RexRed wrote:
I am just saying that matter takes on the properties of its parent (light).

Why do you say that light is the parent of matter? Why do you say that matter takes on its properties? Can you give a link to a legitimate physics source which says this?

RexRed wrote:
Human parents their DNA come together to form one person who have the traits of both parents at once.

Therefore a parent is both in their own body and represented in the body of a sibling at the same time.

Regarding a comparison between light and life, the fact that two things are similar neither means that one caused the other nor that they both have this characteristic because of the same cause. It's good that you're curious, but (a) science isn't done this way, and (b) you can't do physics without actual physics knowledge.
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 10/18/2021 at 03:33:38