You see? You're discussing others' hypotheses related to the BBT!
I am not discussing it - these are subtitles to the title on this thread that you will obviously be unable to understand for life.
No, it is called illiterate spelling mistakes
And I'm doing the same by discussing your alien/ILF/g0d-thingy-of-the-gaps hypothesis.
You are not discussing anything -you are repeating to infinity like a broken record one and the same question that with every post and in any way is becoming more and more distorted. This could be everything else, but discussion.
And guess what? ...
On the next post you will repeat the broken record with the 'gaps of the aliens', for you evidently lack creativity and analytics, and unfortunately some good manners as well.
You're asking for evidence!
No, I am asking you to define the Gaps of your own construct 'whatever of the Gaps', for without defining and enumerating the Gaps your claim collapses like a house of cards.
Now, how about providing some of what you're asking for: evidence?
... and how exactly do you imagine the evidence to the claim that the assumptions of the Big Bang are unknowable?
What about your evidence - do you have the set of equations
& the set of physical interpretations
proving consistency of the Big Bang 'theory': 1. that the Big Bang is consistent as a formal model and can pretend to be some theory; and 2. that the Big Bang is physics at all ... and not literature fiction
, genre fables for idiots