@Renaldo Dubois,
Renaldo Dubois wrote:
They've been holding the graduations in that building for 70 years with no problem. One person is offended. There is no constitutional right to not be offended. Just another example of the far left wanting to control a free people.
People do have a right, whether or not it is allowed to them, to say how their tax money is spent, and the argument should be made by those who would spend it that it is going to serve all the people... There are some people who do not want to see their tax dollars go to support abortions, and since they have a perfectly good moral argument against abortion, they are right to object... Some people do not like war... Some people are okay with defensive war and not offensive war... Some people are okay with prisons but disagree with capital punishment... What their morality demands they should be allowed...
If it were possible to even approximate the cost of war or capital punishment I doubt either would have much support; but on the basis of morality no state has the authority, freely given, to be more immoral that the people it would rule...People can only give to the state the power they have as individuals... If, for example, no one has the power to kill, then that authority cannot be given to the state... If two people, or three do not have the power to kill, then they together cannot give to the state that authority...It is the moral argument that should win since the state should represent our highest morality, and the reason for this is simple... The state has its authority from the people governed, but not one single person can keep an eye on it at all times, and with the state being like a corporation, and immortal people are born into it, and die in it, and so never have individual control over it... Yet the state may control them, and if it is a force for immorality, then the people and their liberty are threatened...
To give the churches their liberty, and to threaten none of them with a state religion is not the same as supporting them as social and political clubs with tax breaks... It is a small edge, but tax free status is a tax shelter... If churches were held to the same standards as charities, many would fold... Most seem to only help themselves... Few seem to represent any forward thinking, modern, or progressive action... To say they are conservative is incorrect for they are reactionary... There should be no freedom of religion... By that I mean: people should have the right to meet and talk and even pray as they see fit... Any support given the churches tends to establish them more firmly in our lives, and the proof of the good they do is how much the rest of society must struggle for their daily bread... They do not good... They help themselves...They threaten our rights and support injustice... They should not be allowed to incorporate, own property, or evade taxes...