Revisiting the 1st amendment

and forth grade English students

Quote:

and forth grade English students

May the forth be with you.

Press, and assembly are all church related

Quote:

and forth grade English students

May the forth be with you.

Quote:

and forth grade English students

May the forth be with you.

Quote:

Press, and assembly are all church related

LOL...............

Quote:

Press, and assembly are all church related

LOL...............

Have you considered either professional counseling,

BillRM wrote:

Quote:

Press, and assembly are all church related

LOL...............

You're showing your ignorance.

Of course they used printing back then, just like today, tracts to advertise -- to attract new converts -- FYI assembly is the same as congregation. ..

I don't mind criticism, but I do mind inane levity

The Establishment of Religion[edit]

Standing to sue
Flast v. Cohen (1968)
Valley Forges and people Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State (1982)
Bender v. Williamsport (1986)


[edit] Tax exemption to religious institutions

Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New York (1970)
Bob Jones University v. United States (1983)
Texas Monthly, Inc. v. Bullock (1989)
[edit] Legislative chaplains
Marsh v. Chambers (1983)

[edit] Government-sponsored religious displays
Lynch v. Donnelly (1984)
County of Allegheny v. ACLU Greater Pittsburgh Chapter (1989)
McCreary County v. ACLU of Kentucky (2005)
Van Orden v. Perry (2005)
[edit] Religion in public education

McCollum v. Board of Education (1948)
Zorach v. Clauson (1952)
Engel v. Vitale (1962)
Abington Township School District v. Schempp (1963)
Epperson v. Arkansas (1968)
Stone v. Graham (1980)
Agostini v. Felton (1997)
Mitchell v. Helms (2000)
[edit] Prayer in public schools

Wallace v. Jaffree (1985)
Lee v. Weisman (1992)
Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. Doe (2000)
Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow (2004)
[edit] Teaching of creationism in public schools
Edwards v. Aguillard (1987)

[edit] Governmental aid to church-related schools

Pierce v. Society of Sisters (1925)
Cochran v. Louisiana State Board of Education (1930)
Everson v. Board of Education (1947)
Board of Education v. Allen (1968)
Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)
Tilton v. Richardson (1971)
Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Nyquist (1973)
Meek v. Pittenger (1975)
Roemer v. Board of Public Works of Maryland (1976)
Wolman v. Walter (1977)
Committee for Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Regan (1980)
Mueller v. Allen (1983)
Aguilar v. Felton (1985)
Grand Rapids School District v. Ball (1985)
Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District (1993)
Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002)
[edit] Blue laws

McGowan v. Maryland (1961)
Braunfeld v. Brown (1961)
Gallagher v. Crown Kosher Super Market of Mass., Inc. (1961)
Thorton v. Caldor (1985)
[edit] Religious institution functioning as a government agency

Larkin v. Grendel’s Den (1982)
Bowen v. Kendrick (1988)
Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School v. Grumet (1994)
[edit] Unequal government treatment of religious groups

Larson v. Valente (1982)
[edit] The free exercise of religion

[edit] PolygamyReynolds v. United States (1878)
Davis v. Beason (1890)
[edit] The Jehovah's Witnesses cases

Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940)
Jones v. City of Opelika (I) (1942)
Jones v. City of Opelika (II) (1943)
Murdock v. Pennsylvania (1943)
Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940)
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943)
Cox v. New Hampshire (1941)
Prince v. Massachusetts (1944)
[edit] Religion and the right to work

Sherbert v. Verner (1963)
Trans World Airlines v. Hardison (1977)
Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Dayton Christian Schools (1986)
Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. Amos (1987)
Employment Division v. Smith (1990)
United States v. National Treasury Employees Union (1995)
[edit] Religious tests for public service or benefits

Torcaso v. Watkins (1961)
McDaniel v. Paty (1978)
Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division (1981)
Goldman v. Weinberger (1986)
Bowen v. Roy (1986)
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942)
[edit] Free exercise and free speech

R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul (1992)
Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente Uniao do Vegetal (2006)
[edit] Free exercise and public education

Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972)
Widmar v. Vincent (1981)
Board of Education of the Westside Community Schools v. Mergens (1990)
Lamb's Chapel v. Center Moriches Union Free School District (1993)
Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia (1995)
[edit] Free Exercise and public property

Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board v. Pinette (1995)
[edit] Solicitation by religious groups

Heffron v. International Society for Krishna Consciousness (1981)
[edit] Free exercise and eminent domain

Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association (1988)
City of Boerne v. Flores (1997)
[edit] Ritual sacrifice of animals

Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah (1993)
[edit] Government intervention in church controversies

United States v. Ballard (1944)
Kedroff v. Saint Nicholas Cathedral (1952)
Presbyterian Church v. Hull Church (1969)
Jones v. Wolf (1979)
[edit] Free speech Freedom of speech portal


[edit] Sedition and imminent danger

Schenck v. United States (1919)
Abrams v. United States (1919)
Gitlow v. New York (1925)
Whitney v. California (1927)
Dennis v. United States (1951)
Yates v. United States (1957)
Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)
[edit] Fighting words and the heckler's veto

Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940)
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942)
Terminiello v. Chicago (1949)
Feiner v. New York (1951)
R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul (1992)
Snyder v. Phelps (2011)
[edit] Freedom of assembly and public forums

Hague v. CIO (1939)
Schneider v. New Jersey (1939)
Martin v. Struthers (1943)
Cox v. Louisiana (1965)
Brown v. Louisiana (1966)
Adderley v. Florida (1966)
Coates v. Cincinnati (1971)
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. Robins (1980)
Hill v. Colorado (2000)
[edit] Symbolic speech

United States v. O'Brien (1968)
Cohen v. California (1971)
Texas v. Johnson (1989)
United States v. Eichman (1990)
[edit] Compelled speech

Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940)
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943)
Wooley v. Maynard (1977)
Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System v. Southworth (2000)
Davenport v. Washington Education Association (2007)
[edit] School speech

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969)
Board of Education v. Pico (1982)
Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser (1986)
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988)
Rosenberger v. University of Virginia (1995)
Morse v. Frederick (2007)
[edit] Obscenity

[edit] GenerallyCases concerned with the definition of obscenity and whether a particular work or type of material is obscene

Roth v. United States (1957)
Alberts v. California, (1957)
One, Inc. v. Owen, (1958)
MANual Enterprises v. Day, (1962)
Jacobellis v. Ohio (1964)
Memoirs v. Massachusetts, (1966)
Kois v. Wisconsin (1972)
Miller v. California (1973)
Jenkins v. Georgia (1974)
New York v. Ferber (1982)
Osborne v. Ohio (1990)
United States v. Stevens (2010)
[edit] As criminal offenseAppeals of criminal convictions for possessing, selling or distributing obscenity that focused on that issue

Rosen v. United States (1896)
Butler v. Michigan (1957)
Smith v. California, (1959)
Stanley v. Georgia (1969)
Ginzburg v. United States, (1966)
Mishkin v. New York, (1966)
Redrup v. New York (1967)
Ginsberg v. New York (1968)
Blount v. Rizzi (1971)
United States v. Reidel (1971)
Heller v. New York (1973)
United States v. Orito (1973)
United States v. X-Citement Video (1994)
[edit] Search, seizure and forfeitureCases involving the search and seizure of allegedly obscene material

Marcus v. Search Warrant, (1961)
Quantity of Books v. Kansas (1964)
Lee Art Theatre, Inc. v. Virginia (1968)
United States v. Thirty-seven Photographs (1971)
United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels of Film (1973)
Roaden v. Kentucky (1973)
Lo-Ji Sales, Inc., v. New York (1979)
Maryland v. Macon (1985)
New York v. P.J. Video, Inc. (1986)
[edit] Civil and administrative regulationCases dealing with civil and administrative regulatory procedures aimed at suppressing or restricting obscenity, such as film-licensing boards or zoning regulations.

Kingsley Books, Inc. v. Brown (1957)
Kingsley Int'l Pictures Corp. v. Regents of Univ. of N. Y. (1959)
Times Film Corp. v. Chicago (1961)
Bantam Books v. Sullivan (1963)
Freedman v. Maryland (1965)
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton (1973)
Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc. (1986)
United States v. Playboy Entertainment Group (2000)
[edit] InternetCases involving laws meant to restrict obscenity online

Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union (1997)
Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union (2002)
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002)
[edit] Speech by public employees

Pickering v. Board of Education (1968)
Mt. Healthy City School Dist. Bd. of Ed. v. Doyle (1977)
Givhan v. Western Line Consol. School Dist. (1979)
Snepp v. United States (1980)
Connick v. Myers (1983)
Rankin v. McPherson (1987)
Waters v. Churchill (1994)
United States v. National Treasury Employees Union (1995)
San Diego v. Roe (2004)
Garcetti v. Ceballos (2007)
Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri (2011)
[edit] Loyalty oaths and affirmations

Garner v. Board of Public Works, (1951)
Adler v. Board of Ed. of City of New York, (1952)
Wiemann v. Updegraff, (1952)
Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction, (1961)
Keyishian v. Board of Regents, (1965)
[edit] Political activity and Hatch ActEx parte Curtis (1882)

United Public Workers v. Mitchell (1947)
United States Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers (1973)
Broadrick v. Oklahoma (1973)
[edit] Commercial speech

Valentine v. Chrestensen (1942)
Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human Relations (1973)
Bigelow v. Commonwealth of Virginia (1974)
Virginia State Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council (1976)
Bates v. State Bar of Arizona (1977)
Linmark Associates, Inc. v. Willingboro (1977)
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission (1980)
Consol. Edison Co. v. Public Serv. Comm'n (1980)
44 Liquormart, Inc. v. Rhode Island (1996)
[edit] Freedom of the press[edit]

Prior restraints and censorshipNear v. Minnesota (1931)
Lovell v. City of Griffin (1938)
New York Times Co. v. United States (1971)
Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Tornillo (1974)
Nebraska Press Assn. v. Stuart (1976)
Houchins v. KQED, Inc. (1978)
[edit] Taxation and privileges

Grosjean v. American Press Co. (1936)
Branzburg v. Hayes (1972)
Minneapolis Star Tribune Company v. Commissioner (1983)
[edit] Defamation

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964)
Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts (1967)
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974)
Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc. (1981)
Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc. (1985)
McDonald v. Smith (1985)
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell (1988)
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. (1990)
[edit] Broadcast media

Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. FCC (1968)
FCC v. Pacifica Foundation (1989)
Turner Broadcasting v. FCC (1995)
[edit] Freedom of association

NAACP v. Alabama (1958)
Shelton v. Tucker (1960)
Branti v. Finkel (1979)
Roberts v. United States Jaycees (1984)
Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Group of Boston (1995)
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale (2000)

while set has his own pleasant style of greeting, he is correct and you are wrong Ricky. The first Amendment has been detailed in many Supreme Court decisions and each phrase has been addressed in unique and seperable rulings.

You may insist that you are correct but insisting doesnt make it so. Itd be better to just accept that youre mistaken and just move on. Please dont compound your error with stubborn ignorance.

Irishk wrote:

Quote:

and forth grade English students

May the forth be with you.

So I made a typo, so what.

You allow me my reality and I'll allow you yours.