@Renaldo Dubois,
Re: Linkat
" This administration will not admit that "enhanced interrogation techniques" played a big part in this. The American people will make up their own mind."
Really? Here's what Donald Rumsfeld, Defense Secretary under Bush from 2001 to 2006, had to say in explaining that waterboarding did not lead the US to bin Laden: "“It is true that some information that came from normal interrogation approaches at Guantanamo did lead to information that was beneficial in this instance. But it was not harsh treatment and it was not waterboarding.”
In fact, under waterboarding, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed lied in 2002/3 about the identity of the courier: "Mohammed did not reveal the names while being subjected to the simulated drowning technique known as waterboarding, former CIA officials said. He identified them many months later under standard interrogation"...but still did not reveal the real identity of the courier or lead directly to bin Laden.
It wasn't until 2005 and "Operation Cannonball, a bureaucratic reshuffling ... placed more C.I.A. case officers on the ground in Pakistan and Afghanistan. With more agents in the field, the C.I.A. finally got the courier’s family name." And not until July 2010 that CIA located and began to spy on the courier.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/03/world/asia/03intel.html
Normal CIA interrogation techniques was one of a broad range of intelligence & spying activities that contributed over many years to Sunday's triumph over Osama bin Laden...including, as Associated Press reported, a telephone call made by the courier last year - the call intercepted by CIA was the final clue which led them directly to Bin Laden's compound.
http://yhoo.it/lrDehc
We understand that Republicans and RWingers just can't face the fact that the 9.11.01 attack took place on Bush/Cheney watch, and that Bush/Cheney let Bin Laden get away when they had him caught at Tora Bora...or that Bush took his eye of Afghanistan, where Bin Laden was, and waged a useless & $1T war in Iraq as a senseless part of the "War on Terror"....and finally, hate that it was the Democratic President Obama, derided by RW as "soft on terror" that ran down and killed the world's most sought after terrorist & 9.11.01 mastermind.
Get over it - accept it & give credit to USA's vast intelligence network, the role of Leon Panetta & the CIA...the awesome Navy SEALs and our gutsy strategic Commander-in-Chief...just don't lie all the time. On Sunday, when he announced the news Obama gave recognition to President Bush...try learning from Obama's graceful conduct.