19
   

Did Waterboarding lead to the death of Osama?

 
 
Renaldo Dubois
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 11:06 am
@parados,
Was Mohammed a true muslim?
Renaldo Dubois
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 11:17 am
@JTT,
It appears we are a nation of war criminals according to you. Yes, that does make me proud that you would think of the American people as war criminals. At least now I know exactly what I am dealing with.
parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 11:17 am
@Renaldo Dubois,
Why are you asking me a question about true muslims?
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 11:24 am
@Renaldo Dubois,
Quote:
No, it wasn't made in the USA. It was made by Islam.


Saddam Hussein was made by Islam?

Quote:
OBL and the Taliban are muslims who believe in Islam as their nation, and they are not made by Americans.


You are flat out dead wrong on both counts, Renaldo. The US made Saddam Hussein. They put him in power and supported him through the worst of his crimes. They treated him as a good friend. I believe that he was made an honorary citizen of Detroit.

The CIA, you know, that gang of terrorists that works for you and the US government, made the Taliban and OBL. There is strong evidence that suggests that OBL worked for the US right up to 9-11 and considering how long it took to find a guy hidden in plain sight, he probably was, if not working for the US, on a US pension.

JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 11:43 am
@Renaldo Dubois,
Quote:
It appears we are a nation of war criminals according to you.[/quote

I didn't say that. I've never said that. But now you are just doing what you do best, obfuscating.

The central issue is that Bush and many of his extended gang are war criminals.
Renaldo Dubois
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 02:30 pm
@parados,
YOU are the one who said OBL is not a true muslim. Was Mohammed a true muslim? Yes or no.
Renaldo Dubois
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 02:33 pm
@JTT,
When did the US put Saddam in power?
0 Replies
 
Renaldo Dubois
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 02:33 pm
@JTT,
So in 2004 the American people voted for a war criminal for President. Wow. We are sure glad to know that. Thanks.
DrewDad
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 02:46 pm
@Renaldo Dubois,
The American public also elected Nixon. Go figure.
0 Replies
 
parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 02:51 pm
@Renaldo Dubois,
Renaldo Dubois wrote:

YOU are the one who said OBL is not a true muslim.
I did? When did I say that?

Quote:
Was Mohammed a true muslim? Yes or no.
You are so easy to manipulate RD.
Renaldo Dubois
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 02:59 pm
@parados,
You said it right here. http://able2know.org/topic/171552-41#post-4609659

Kinda hard to answer questions when all you have is what you hear. A parrot can do what you do.
parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 03:33 pm
@Renaldo Dubois,
Oh.. so you can read past the first time you are "interrupted". You just refuse to do so when you can't respond. Just as I suspected all along.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 03:38 pm
@parados,
parados wrote:

Oh.. so you can read past the first time you are "interrupted". You just refuse to do so when you can't respond. Just as I suspected all along.


Yeah, he's a ******* idiot of a troll, inconsistent in his boorishness.

In other news:

Quote:
May 16, 2011 2:00 PM
Panetta letter: torture not key to killing bin Laden

At this point, it’s simply assumed in conservative circles that torture was responsible for the killing of Osama bin Laden. There’s ample evidence to the contrary, but for the right, the debate, such as it was, ended two weeks ago.

For those who are impervious to evidence, reality will probably never matter. But for those who still value reason, Greg Sargent has a terrific scoop today.

Quote:
CIA chief Leon Panetta has written a private letter to Senator John McCain that offers the most detailed answer yet to questions about the relationship between torture and Osama Bin Laden’s death — and undercuts the claim by former Bush administration officials that torture was key to Bin Laden’s killing.

The letter has not been released publicly but was sent my way by a source. Marie Harf, a CIA spokesperson, confirmed the letter’s authenticity to me, but declined further comment.

Last week, Senator McCain published a widely discussed Op ed in the Washington Post calling into question claims that torture was instrumental in tracking down Bin Laden. McCain cited Panetta as a source for his information, but didn’t release any material provided to him by Panetta, and conservatives like former Bush attorney general Michael Mukasey subsequently dismissed McCain’s account. The CIA has not publicly taken sides in the dispute.

But Panetta’s letter, dated May 9th, bears out McCain’s version of events.

This is an important revelation. Mukasey, whose assessment was quickly embraced by the right, claimed waterboarding Khalid Sheik Mohammed produced the first grain of intelligence that got the OBL ball rolling — the name of bin Laden’s favorite courier. McCain described Mukasey’s remarks as “false.”

And Panetta’s correspondence bolster’s McCain’s judgment. Indeed, the CIA director makes clear that “no detainee in CIA custody revealed the facilitator/courier’s full true name or specific whereabouts. This information was discovered through other intelligence means.”

As Greg concluded, “In the end, we may never be able to establish with total certainty the precise nature of the relationship between torture and the killing of Bin Laden. But for now, Panetta’s account — the most extensive public accounting we now have — simply doesn’t square with claims that torture was key to getting him, which would vindicate Bush’s torture policies.”

We can only hope some of the hacks bother to read this. Fox News’ Sean Hannity, for example, told viewers a week ago, citing Panetta for support, “[W]ithout enhanced interrogation, without rendition, without black sites, this day would not have been possible. So, if we want more successful days like this, we must argue that the Obama policies were wrong and the Bush policies were right.”

This backwards assessment came a week after Obama’s policies led to bin Laden’s demise, and after McCain had already explained how wrong this line of thought is.


http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal/2011_05/panetta_letter_torture_not_key029602.php

The simple fact of the matter is that there is no evidence that torture lead to the killing of OBL. And that those who claim that it did, are doing so without evidence, and are pushing a political position - one designed to rid them of any responsibility for voting in and supporting leaders who instituted a program of torture, lied about it, and tried to cover their tracks before they left office.

Cycloptichorn
Renaldo Dubois
 
  0  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 03:46 pm
@parados,
Wow. That's pretty good. Now be a good boy and eat your cookies and drink your milk.

I always have time to point out liars.
Renaldo Dubois
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 03:48 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
If waterboarding a terrorist is torture, then what do YOU call it when an unarmed terrorist is shot in the eyeball with his brains dripping out of his empty socket? Spaghetti and meatballs?
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 03:53 pm
@Renaldo Dubois,
Renaldo Dubois wrote:

If waterboarding a terrorist is torture, then what do YOU call it when an unarmed terrorist is shot in the eyeball with his brains dripping out of his empty socket? Spaghetti and meatballs?


That's a political assassination. It certainly isn't torture; he likely felt no pain whatsoever.

Cycloptichorn
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 04:04 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
What's significant is this information is coming out of the CIA, the one's who did the torture in the first place. Mr. Dubois is not only way too stupid to believe this, he's also delusional. Those of us who believe that torture had no part to play in Bin Laden's capture do not believe that because of evidence, and being able to add two and two. No, in the slobbering, hallucinogenic, crapulent world that Mr. Dubois inhabits, we believe that because we have been brainwashed in our interrogation centres, and told to think that way by our leaders.

I am not joking, he really is that mad. Check out the last couple of pages of the thread 'Do you believe in Christian Shariah law,' for confirmation. And if you don't already know it, you can see what a thoroughly obnoxious bigot Mr. Dubois is.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 04:21 pm
@Renaldo Dubois,
Quote:
If waterboarding a terrorist is torture, then what do YOU call it when an unarmed terrorist is shot in the eyeball with his brains dripping out of his empty socket? Spaghetti and meatballs?


Most certainly not torture, Ren. That would be a war crime, if it actually happened but given the duplicitous nature of US governments, one just can never tell.

parados
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 05:05 pm
@Renaldo Dubois,
Renaldo Dubois wrote:

Wow. That's pretty good.
Thank you.

Quote:
Now be a good boy and eat your cookies and drink your milk.
Is that what you mother tells you every night?

Quote:

I always have time to point out liars.
And I always have time to pull your strings.
Renaldo Dubois
 
  1  
Reply Mon 16 May, 2011 05:47 pm
@Cycloptichorn,
Now that's funny........."A political assassination". Seeing as how that is against international law, does that make Obungo a war criminal?

How do you know he felt no pain? There was no autopsy. Are you channeling the events?

 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 12:26:42