Rovers on Mars

Me too.

NASA completes testing of sophisticated Mars rover
‎

Engineers finished up functional testing of the $2.5 billion Mars Science Laboratory last week, verifying the Curiosity rover can make it to Mars and pursue scientific clues that the planet may have once harbored life.

Great! When is it scheduled to land on Mars?

WASHINGTON -- NASA and the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum will host a news conference at 10 a.m. EDT, Friday, July 22 to announce the selected landing site for the agency's latest Mars rover. NASA Television and the agency's website will provide live coverage of the event that will be held at the museum's Moving Beyond Earth Gallery. In addition, the event will be carried live on Ustream, with a live chat available, at http://www.ustream.tv/nasajpl .

The Mars Science Laboratory, or Curiosity, will land on the surface of Mars in August 2012

Wow, a year from now? The launch must be pretty soon.

That crater's big and I'm sure it's deep, but I don't seem much exposed stratified rock. I'm not sure anything is going to be as good as that first crater that Opportunity bounced into when it landed.

Wow. It's huge!

Opportunity has trundled to a crater called Endeavour.

And the first rock it looked at has already opened a new chapter in the study of Mars, NASA scientists said Thursday. On a telephone news conference, mission scientists giddily described that rock: full of zinc and bromine, elements that, at least for rocks on Earth, would be suggestive of geology formed with heat and water.

“This rock doesn’t look like anything else we’ve seen before” on Mars, said Steven W. Squyres, a professor of astronomy at Cornell and principal investigator of the rover mission.

The rim of Endeavour — a 14-mile-wide depression that was carved out by an impact long ago — consists of rocks from an earlier geological era that the impact lifted up from below. If the aging rover holds up, it could spend years examining the new terrain, giving NASA scientists ample grist for discovery.

Scientists are most interested in a close-up look at clay deposits that have been detected from orbit by another craft — NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter — but that Opportunity has yet to find. Clay forms in the presence of liquid water, and the deposits suggest a warmer, wetter period in Mars’s past that may have offered friendlier conditions for life.

“This is a brand new mission, brand new landing site for all intents and purposes, geologically,” Dr. Squyres said. “A whole new set of puzzles for us to go off and solve.”

I'm wondering if the shape of those rocks suggest anything of consequence.

I haven't the foggiest, CI.

Proof of life. At the center of that rock is a couple of ant hills.

Cool stuff, EB, thanks . . .

Why is that rock white on top? Is that a camera effect, or is it something on the rock?

The smaller rock also has the white on top; it's probably not a photo effect.

Earth microbes trying to make it to Mars must survive sterilization in NASA's clean rooms, harsh cosmic rays during months of space travel, and the Red Planet's unforgiving surface environment. But any bacteria that successfully hitchhike aboard the wheels of NASA's Mars Science Laboratory mission in 2012 might manage to scratch out a brief existence on the martian surface.

The finding comes from a study that examined how the new high-tech landing technique of the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) may affect the risk of contaminating Mars. The mission will use both a parachute and downward-firing thruster rockets to slow its descent so that its "sky crane" can lower the SUV-sized Curiosity rover onto the surface — a direct touchdown that may give microbes a brief chance to experience life on Mars. That translates into a higher risk of contamination when compared to some past Mars rover missions, said Andrew C. Schuerger, a microbiologist at the University of Florida and the Space Life Sciences Lab at NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida. But he added that microbes still face tough odds for surviving space travel and martian conditions.


"Although this paper suggests we could be transferring bacteria to martian surface, we don't know for certain yet," Schuerger said. "We could very well be losing most due to the exposure to vacuum in space, cosmic rays and hard radiation. Even if cells are present on a rover wheel at launch, they might be dead by the time they get to Mars."

Standing still

Schuerger and his colleague, Krystal Kerney, wanted to find out whether the wheels of Mars rovers past and future could contaminate the martian surface. They ran two experiments simulating the contamination possibilities for MSL versus the Mars Pathfinder mission of 1997 and the Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) that landed on the red planet in 2004.

The Mars Pathfinder rover, called Sojourner, sat on a landing platform for 2 martian days before rolling onto the surface. The twin MER rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, sat on their landing platforms for 12 and 7 martian days, respectively. Each martian day is just a little over 24 hours.

In the recent study, researchers simulated a Mars rover sitting on a landing platform for 1, 3 and 6 hours while being exposed to martian levels of ultraviolet (UV) rays. Even such short amounts of time killed between 81 percent and 96.6 percent of the Bacillus subtilis bacteria used in the experiment.


"We did very short UV exposures, and even there we see 96 percent [of bacteria killed] over 6 hours," Schuerger told Astrobiology Magazine. "That's a very dramatic and a very positive sign that a rover wheel which sits on a platform, like MER did, has a much better chance of being sterilized prior to roll-off than a direct to ground system."

The number of survivors would likely have dropped to practically zero if the experiment had run for 7 or 12 days, Schuerger said.

Rolling in the dirt

By contrast, the second experiment simulated how a rover wheel in the future MSL mission would immediately come into contact with the martian surface. When the contaminated rover wheel rolled over the simulated surface, about 31.7 percent of the surface samples ended up showing bacterial growth.

But the contamination level dropped by 50 percent after 24 hours of exposure to simulated Mars conditions, such as UV radiation, low pressure, low temperature and high levels of carbon dioxide. The results pointed once again to the harshness of the martian surface environment for Earth life.

The second experiment doesn't say anything definitive about the real risk of contamination, Schuerger warned. For instance, it didn't test whether having multiple wheels rolling over the same surface area could bury microbes from the first wheel beneath the martian surface. It also didn't simulate the weight of the SUV-sized Curiosity rover that could mash even more microbes into the ground.

On the other hand, the researchers contaminated the rover wheels with perhaps 100,000 times more bacteria compared to what would realistically exist during any of the Mars rover missions. Some Mars rovers get sterilized three or four times, Schuerger said. He added that the journey through space may kill 75 percent of whatever survived after launch.

The next test

What the experiments do suggest is that just having the Curiosity rover sit still for a number of days could help kill off much of the bacteria clinging to its wheels. But the researchers still have questions to answer. "We need to repeat these experiments with much longer time exposures to martian conditions to see if we can get to a rover wheel completely sterilized sitting on a landing pad," Schuerger explained. "We also need to see if 7 or 8 martian days would essentially get to zero amount of survivors, even if we accidentally transferred bacterial spores to the surface."

Such contamination experiments could be done more easily once humans establish a Mars colony and can work alongside their robotic rovers, Schuerger said. But for now, he will have to make do with small Mars simulation chambers on Earth.

The study was detailed in the June 2011 issue of journal Astrobiology.

Microbes on Mars, assuming humans spend any time there, are inevitable. I am curious to know if any would survive and how adapt.