@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:
But a secret ballot effectively eliminates the effects of intimidation from wherever it may arise.
Do you honestly believe that?
Imagine an employer who told an employee, that if the union went through, that their job would be in danger because of all the added costs. Or that they would lose their job, because the owners would close the plant or store rather than unionize. Or that their health insurance would be dropped. Or they make it clear that life at work will be hellish for the employee.
And they tell many different people this, in private. You don't think that this would affect a vote? I do.
Quote: The use of cards signed in front of a union organizer invites intimidation, but only from one side. This is why cyclo likes it - it will surely lead to more union successes in organizing. Unions want card check because they consistently lose fair elections.
You could just as easily say that it fails so often because employer intimidation is so powerful a force.
There's two sides to this, but you don't take the concerns of the other side seriously at all. I don't believe you actually think employers intimidate their employees into not voting for unions. Do you?
Or is it nothing but union 'thugs' on one side, who you seem to paint as gangsters or mafia members with your description of them, and valiant, well-meaning members of management and ownership on the other?
Cycloptichorn