@georgeob1,
George, yes most of us "credulous observers" are watching & hoping for “good results” in Egypt, Tunisia, Bahrain, Libya, etc ... But we are merely very interested observers of these events, not participants. The same as you.
I haven't seen any confident predictions about the outcome of these struggles from any of us, have you?
But what is so "credulous" about hoping that the people risking their lives in these struggles actually
do achieve better lives for themselves, free of the poverty & repression they've lived with for years? Why shouldn't we support their struggles for human rights & hope they achieve those goals? The same as we have in Burma, in South Africa under apartheid, the East Timorese fighting for independence from Indonesia?
spendius said:
Quote:I don't really understand why some posters on this thread are siding with the protesters which is the same thing as overthrowing their governments. I can make a case that such an outcome is in the interests of the protesters and also a case that it is in our interests. But my confidence in either case is not all that high. It's a speculation.
Is this the statement which you thought had some merit, George?
I'm sure a "case" could be made for any number of positions. Like supporting autocratic regimes in the middle east because they're best for "our" interests.
But what do “our” interests have to do with
their struggles for self determination, their aspirations for decent lives? Is it reasonable to argue that our interests should override theirs?
I don't believe so.
Maybe the west will just have to adjust "our interests" in the light of changed circumstances? Which might not be a bad thing at all, for all we know. We will just have to wait to see what happens.
Anyway, back to the media coverage of the most recent events in Bahrain & Libya, now ....