53
   

Tunesia, Egyt and now Yemen: a domino effect in the Middle East?

 
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 09:26 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Also interesting, the author of the article:
Quote:
Robert Grenier is a retired, 27-year veteran of the CIA’s Clandestine Service. He was Director of the CIA’s Counter-Terrorism Centre from 2004 to 2006.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  2  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 09:54 pm
Also from Al Jazeera: a couple of recent articles on the Muslim Brotherhood.
The first from the "opinion" section, the second an "in depth" profile article, on the history & goals of the Brotherhood :


Quote:
Who's afraid of the Muslim Brothers
Mohammed Khan Last Modified: 09 Feb 2011 08:10 GMT

Western fears of 'Islamism' have been aided by Arab autocrats seeking to prolong their iron-fisted rule.

http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/Images/2011/2/8/201128112246217784_20.jpg
There are offshoots of the Muslim Brotherhood in countries across the region [EPA]

"Islamism" has been sending jitters through Western political corridors over recent years readily aided and abetted by Arab autocrats who have exaggerated and harnessed the "Islamist" threat to prolong their iron-fisted rule.

In the case of Egypt, the biggest bogeyman in this long-running battle over political supremacy with the state is the Muslim Brotherhood (the Ikhwan al-Muslimun) whose influence extends across the Arab and Islamic world.

With the Middle East and North Africa currently convulsed by popular uprisings against political repression, the Muslim Brotherhood has been thrust into the limelight, not only by those seeking a better insight into the origins and goals of the movement as they try to peer into Egypt's future, but also by those whose entire raison d'etre consists of demonising the Ikhwan for ulterior political ends.

"I'm fed up" of ruling Egypt, complained Hosni Mubarak to an American news channel on February 4 as protests against his 30-year presidency accelerated. "But if I resign now, there will be chaos. And I'm afraid the Muslim Brotherhood will take over," he warned.

In a couple of short sentences, Mubarak wonderfully encapsulated the fear that his regime has generated over three decades in order to maintain control. With little concern for the sentiments of his people, Mubarak played directly to the fears of his Western backers: Either support my despotism, whatever its limitations, he was saying, or face having to deal with the "Islamists".


While leaders in the US and the EU stutter over how to respond to the new realities in the region, unfortunately for Mubarak, the people of Egypt are refusing to buy into his fear-mongering. The Muslim Brotherhood - whether Mubarak's regime and his backers like it or not - is part and parcel of Egyptian society.

The Ikhwan is the "father" of Islamic political activism, tracing its roots back to 1928 when it emerged as a movement advocating a return to Islamic morals. Its early political activism was against British rule in Egypt when it opposed the Westernisation of the country. While its formative years were devoted to overcoming imperialism, its history has been marked by challenges to the political status quo and, thus, to fending off state repression. The Muslim Brotherhood has alternately been tolerated, outlawed, its leaders assassinated and/or executed.

Despite the suppression, its popularity has grown owing mainly to a network of medical, legal, social and charitable services that it continues to provide. Where the state has failed Egyptians, the Ikhwan has helped prop up peoples' lives.

Such is its influence that it has spawned offshoots in Algeria, Tunisia, Sudan, Libya and Somalia in Africa, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine and Israel in the Levant, across the Gulf States and further afield in places such as Pakistan. Misconceptions in the West about the movement do not detract from the Brotherhood's popular following in Egypt and beyond....<cont>


http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/02/20112810283643766.html

Quote:
In Depth:
Profile: Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood
Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun is the country's oldest and largest Islamic organisation. .....


http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/2011/02/201126101349142168.html
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:18 pm
Just a side issue to the focus of this thread: but I am intrigued by the small ads on the Al Jazerra site, saying things like: "demand Al Jazeera in the USA".

Is Al Jazeera not available in all parts of the US?

If that's the case, what's the story?
JPB
 
  2  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:20 pm
@msolga,
Al Jazeera is only available on cable in the DC area, I believe. Cable companies refuse to carry it for the most part.
JPB
 
  2  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:23 pm
@msolga,
http://www.newsweek.com/2011/02/05/not-coming-to-america.html
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:25 pm
@JPB,
Thanks, JPB.

Gosh.

For "political" reasons? (No idea. I'm guessing.)

If so, very short-sighted.
It's a terrific, well respected source of news, and not just from the middle east.
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:31 pm
@msolga,
Ignorance and fear of the ME boogieman mostly. I made a comment about it earlier today http://able2know.org/topic/167119-68#post-4504133
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:33 pm
@JPB,
Surprised

Gosh, again!!!

Political censorship.

Pretty incredible.

Quote:
... the Bush administration was intent on promoting democracy across the Middle East. But as it waged wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, it also sought to filter the information flowing to the American people. Washington’s “with us or against us” mentality, regrettably, quickly demonized Al Jazeera for daring to provide alternative viewpoints on wars that had, to put it bluntly, been sanitized for American audiences. Already famous in the Middle East for telling both sides of the story, Al Jazeera was not about to compromise its professional standards and ignore the human realities of war on the ground.

What stunned us then, as it does today, is the insistence by U.S. operators that Americans are not interested. From a commercial standpoint, they argued, Al Jazeera was not worth their precious bandwidth. Our figures prove otherwise. In recent days, our online viewership has spiked by 2,500 percent. And more than half of those eyeballs are coming from the U.S.!


http://www.newsweek.com/2011/02/05/not-coming-to-america.html
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:33 pm
@JPB,
my guess is that it is available on satellite.

msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:36 pm
@Rockhead,
Any computer with internet access can pick Al Jazeera up in my country.
I'd imagine this would be the case in most other western countries.

Wow, amazing.
And pretty misguided.
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:37 pm
@msolga,
most Americans only care about the middle east when the media whips a frenzy.

it's a distant bogeyman.
JPB
 
  2  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:40 pm
@Rockhead,
I don't know about satellite for TV but I've been streaming it online since last week.

http://english.aljazeera.net/watch_now/
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:40 pm
@msolga,
Same here, so far as I know. Anyway, I can. Not the same as being on cable tv, but that's the choice of the cable providers - again, so far as I know.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:41 pm
@Rockhead,
I recall recently reading on some US news site (NYT?) that Al Jazeera had become a favoured source of news about Egypt, etc, at the moment. (I'll see if I can find it.)

Though how all those Americans can access it, who knows?
Do most people have cable?

JPB
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:42 pm
@msolga,
The internet.
0 Replies
 
Rockhead
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:42 pm
@msolga,
you're asking the wrong guy.

my computer is my window to the world.

I would guess cable is in around 50% of homes.

satellite somewhat less...
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:53 pm
@msolga,
Nope, can't track that article down again.
This was the closest I could get, at the NYT.

Thanks, JBP, Rocky & roger:

Quote:
Al Jazeera English Finds an Audience
By BRIAN STELTER
Published: January 31, 2011


White House officials have turned to Al Jazeera English among other television channels to monitor the mounting protests in Egypt. But most Americans lack the same ability to tune in to the broadcaster, which is based in Qatar, because cable and satellite companies in the United States have largely refused its requests to be carried.

With the network’s coverage of the crisis drawing praise, however, Al Jazeera executives said Monday that they planned to renew their lobbying to be carried on cable systems across the United States. .... <cont>


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/01/world/middleeast/01jazeera.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=US%20audience%20+%20al%20jazeera&st=cse
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  2  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:54 pm
@msolga,
I suspect a majority with television also have cable. I have neither.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 10:58 pm
@roger,
Thanks.
I don't have cable, either, roger.
(Glad I'm not the only one to admit that! Wink
I have TV, but rarely watch it.
The internet is my main source of news. )
0 Replies
 
Ceili
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 11:21 pm
@msolga,
Aljeezera is not available on American TV, although they have been petitioning for the right to do so for years. I believe the reason the west is watchingéreading in record numbers is that people are discovering it for the first time because of recent events and liking what the see and hear.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 02/01/2025 at 02:39:52