53
   

Tunesia, Egyt and now Yemen: a domino effect in the Middle East?

 
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 04:30 pm
@hawkeye10,
hawk, You're isolating a big question into one. Doesn't work that way.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  2  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 04:38 pm
For those with strong stomachs

9:41pm GMT: Robert Tait, a radio journalist who was formerly the Guardian's correspondent in Iran, describes his experience at the hands of the Mukhabarat – the regime's sinister security force – after he was detained last Friday in Cairo. It's stomach-turning stuff:

At first, I attached no meaning to the dull slapping sounds. But comprehension dawned as, amid loud shouting, I heard the electrocuting rods being ratcheted up More at 9:41
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  3  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 04:40 pm
SOMEONE GETS IT!!!

10:11 GMT: Ahmed Zewail, the US-Egyptian scientist who won the Nobel prize for chemistry, calls on Mubarak to step down "tomorrow," in an interview with Reuters:

"Comparing Egypt to a "diseased body", he recommended swift surgery, not aspirin.

"I know exactly what the youth want. They want to see a new Egypt. It's as simple of that," said Zewail, who serves as President Obama's science envoy to the Middle East.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 04:42 pm
From Al Jazeera live blog

10:07pm GMT+2: Here is, as Stephen Colbert would put it, your moment of zen ... it appears that the Muslim Brotherhood and the White House are in sync.

Here's what Robert Gibbs, White House spokesman, said about the Egyptian government response to the protests (from the AP):

The government has not taken the necessary steps that the people of Egypt need to see. That's why more and more people come out to register their grievances.

Gibbs also criticized the steps taken by Egyptian Vice President Omar Suleiman, Egyptian vice president, who is tasked with coming up with a transition plan.

The process for his transition does not appear to be in line with the people of Egypt. We believe that more has to be done.

And here's what Issam Elarian, spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood, told Al Jazeera:

It's a strange situation - the Egyptian people are asking for real democracy, and the vice president says that people are not ready for democracy. Egyptian people need a civil, democratic state.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 04:47 pm
@msolga,
msolga wrote:

I was not commenting on Haiti, Cuba, Japan, the south pacific, or US & allies wars anywhere else. I don’t think it would be particularly useful to side-track this thread into a discussion of the rights & wrongs, wisdom or otherwise, of those US interventions. However, for the record, JTT’s assessments of those events are closer to mine than yours are.


I suspected as much. I don't see JTT's posts, but he is sufficiently monotone to make that unnecessary.

Your unwillingness to address the context in which your frequent moral judgements are made and any comparative analysis to determine the consistency (or lack thereof) of your views is noted.
fbaezer
 
  5  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 04:48 pm
@fbaezer,
fbaezer wrote:


What to say about the Egiptian army's passivity while the Mubarak squads attacked the protestors?
Either or.
Either the military are siding clearly with Mubarak, or they are hoping there is more chaos, so they -and not Mubarak- can reap on it. Offer order to both the Egyptian society and the Western powers. Offer (inside) democracy tomorrow but no democracy today and (outside) elections but with some guarantee the fundamentalists won't take power.



I stand by my former position, but think it's more the "or" than the "either".

A Coup d'Etat is approaching Egypt at least as fast as democracy.

---

This being said, let us remember one thing.
Cairo is not Teheran. Cairo is not Prague, either.

An eventual victory of the opposition will not lead (at least, not inmediately) to a teocracy. It will not lead either to Western style democracy.
Democracy is not only a matter of the will of the people; it's also a matter of some basic working institutions and an underlying historical culture of participation.

JPB
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 04:52 pm
Long discussion on the separation between Washington and Mubarak on CNN, including the following:

Quote:
Gibbs, however, said it was the people of Egypt who needed to see concrete steps toward the changes they seek, and that the Obama administration was merely expressing the reality of the situation.

"I think it is clear that what the government has so far put forward has yet to meet the minimum threshold of the people of Egypt," Gibbs said, later adding: "I think if there's some notion on the government side that you can put the genie back in this bottle, I think that's gone a long time ago."

Asked about past warnings that the United States could withhold some or all of the more than $1 billion in annual military aid to Egypt, Gibbs said any decision would be based on the response of the Egyptian government to the demonstrations.

"We are watching quite closely to see what those responses are, and the response of the government will determine what that aid looks like," Gibbs said. He repeated U.S. opposition to any kind of violent crackdown on the protesters, indicating that could be a litmus test for a decision to withhold aid.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 04:56 pm
@georgeob1,
Quote:
JTT's posts, but he is sufficiently monotone to make that unnecessary.


It was exactly that, your monotone defense of US war crimes that MsOlga was objecting to, Gob. The difference between you and me, and it is grand canyonesque, is that you lie with alarming regularity.

Quote:
Your unwillingness to address the context in which your frequent moral judgements are made and any comparative analysis to determine the consistency (or lack thereof) of your views is noted.


MsOlga addressed the tripe you raised and she let you know in pretty certain terms that it was a pile of BS, still steaming. It's you who has decided to make a break for the hills.

Same ole Gob.
0 Replies
 
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 04:58 pm
From the NYT blogs

Quote:
After speaking with some Middle East scholars who attended a meeting on Egypt as the White House on Tuesday, Laura Rozen of Politico reported that the administration is focused on how far it can push Egypt's new vice president, Omar Suleiman. Ms. Rozen wrote this morning:

"Nobody has any illusions about what Omar Suleiman wants to do," an attendee said. "What is unknown is what Omar Suleiman could be persuaded to do. Can they put in place a process that as it plays out puts Egypt in a different place than it is now."

"One thing that struck me is a certain optimism that you can't put the toothpaste back in tube," he continued. "That Egypt is irrevocably changed from what it was two weeks ago. And that in the long run Egypt is going to move in a positive direction."


snip More at 5:26pm

Quote:
Earlier in the day, Egyptian Foreign Minister Ahmed Aboul Gheit said in an interview with PBS:

The issue of the emergency law as Vice President Biden stated yesterday, when I read it this morning I was really amazed, because, because right now, as we speak, we have 17,000 prisoners loose in the streets out of jails that have been destroyed. How can you ask me to sort of disband that emergency law while I'm in difficulty? Give me time, allow me to have control to stabilize the nation, to stabilize the state and then we would look into the issue.

Citing the prison breaks as a reason to maintain the state of emergency is unlikely to convince many Egyptians of the government's sincerity, given that prisoners apparently escaped from Egyptian jails only after the country's police appeared to abandon their posts following a failed attempt to use force to end street protests on Jan. 28.
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  2  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 05:06 pm
@fbaezer,
Quote:
Democracy is not only a matter of the will of the people; it's also a matter of some basic working institutions and an underlying historical culture of participation.


I posted an article a few pages back that made that exact point - saying that strong institutions were the enablers in Tunisia, and the lack of them is why Libya won't/can't go the same route. You need institutions in place that can keep a country functioning without a government for a while, that have protocols for dealing with transitions of power, that can keep order within a set of rules, whose impartiality the majority of populace have faith in. Those are the key features of western democracies.

Take for example the shooting of JFK - the USA didn't fall into a heap. But remove Gaddafi from Libya suddenly and all sh*t breaks loose. Without firmly established protocols there are massive scrambles for power and most likely a splintering of central authority and a teeter toward chaos.

It's difficult for many western nations to imagine their armies stepping in to take over the country, even as an interim measure, but for much of the rest of the world it's an option with fair probability in many situations.

I wonder if all the 'Kim junioring' in NK is there way of managing transition of power.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 05:47 pm
@georgeob1,
Quote:
noted

Oh no!
I was hoping you wouldn't pick that up! Wink



Good posts, fbaezer & hinge.
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 06:10 pm
@JPB,
Quote:
Asked about past warnings that the United States could withhold some or all of the more than $1 billion in annual military aid to Egypt, Gibbs said any decision would be based on the response of the Egyptian government to the demonstrations.


I think such a decision would be based on who might offer to offer to fill the gap.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 06:13 pm
@hingehead,
Where does Iraq sit on "working institutions?" Seems violence is picking up there.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 06:17 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
Asked about past warnings that the United States could withhold some or all of the more than $1 billion in annual military aid to Egypt, Gibbs said any decision would be based on the response of the Egyptian government to the demonstrations.


With my slightly more than casual perusal of this issue, I've discovered that people are being tortured. Just what is it that the Egyptian government must do to trigger the withholding of funds.

Oh wait, silly me, torture has been going on for years and years. The US sends its dirty laundry to Egypt to be taken care of.
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 06:23 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
Just what is it that the Egyptian government must do to trigger the withholding of funds.


Look for funds elsewhere. That was my point. Withholding of US funds is not the same as withholding funds from the Egyptian government's point of view. Or even US funds through intermediaries.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 06:33 pm
@spendius,
Quote:
Or even US funds through intermediaries.


And leave those protesters clamoring for democracy hanging, the USA, surely, Spendi, you don't believe that the US is capable of something that ne far i ous , oh wait, silly me.
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  2  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 07:27 pm
@cicerone imposter,
When I was composing my last post I was going to mention Iraq - basically the army did take over - just not the Iraqi army. Imagine if the CotW had never invaded but Saddam Hussein had been assassinated - the country would have teetered on the brink of chaos depending on how long it takes, and how hard the struggle, to fill the power vacuum.

My understanding of the CotW mission is to build up those institutions before withdrawing. However I think they will leave before those institutions are ready, and those institutions will probably never be 'ready' because they aren't homegrown.

PS CotW = 'coalition of the willing'
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  3  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 08:34 pm
@JPB,
Once again, it sounds like we're (the US) is trying to see which way everyone is running so we can jump in front and "lead".
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 08:49 pm
@roger,
Another perspective on the softly-softly Obama approach to Egypt.
Interesting read. :

Quote:
Obama and Egypt: Fear and Loathing:
A fortnight is a long time in politics - and the past two weeks have left US rhetoric playing catch-up with reality. ...<cont>
Robert Grenier


http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/opinion/2011/02/20112893158270657.html
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Wed 9 Feb, 2011 09:09 pm
@msolga,
msolga, Good article; it explains a lot about why Obama and his administration has stumbled so badly on this crisis. Even smart guys stumble some times.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 04/30/2025 at 07:34:52