53
   

Tunesia, Egyt and now Yemen: a domino effect in the Middle East?

 
 
realjohnboy
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 07:31 pm
@JPB,
That would be a big deal, JPB.
0 Replies
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  3  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 07:31 pm
@JPB,
It was fairly clear, earlier in the day, that the patience of the general population was wearing thin, which was the hope and plan of the government.

So much has been made in this thread about how the Egyptians are simply ordinary folks with the same hope and desires as anyone else in any other country.

The fact that a lot of them are frustrated and scared by the ongoing turmoil goes a long way to prove that point.

This is what happens in a country where dissidents are jailed and tortured, not every third person randomly selected off the street or every single person who is a member of a particular religious sect. Where the new is controlled by the government but the family can sit around the TV and watch sit-coms and Egyptian Idol.

If there is a chance that their situation can improve and their freedoms expanded most of them we be all for it; many may even participate early on, but when participation provides a good chance of getting badly injured or killed, they can't put food on the table or keep the electricity running, and daily routines are completely upended, the fever cools and they want things to get back to "normal."

They're not, by any means, quislings, but neither were they ever reckless but courageous freedom fighters...they are simply ordinary people.

This movement always had a shelf-life; the demonstrations couldn't go on forever. It was always a game of chicken; who would blink first. In Tunisia the despot didn't have the Egyptian army behind him nor the spine of Mubarak. He cut and run early on. Obviously that didn't happen in Egypt and there is a tipping point in these things where time begins to favor one side over the other. It looks like that tipping point has come to Cairo.

It's not over yet of course, as so many of these events are governed by chance as much as design. A particularly brutal crackdown tomorrow might completely extinguish the fire in the population's hearts or rekindle it.

A planned brutal action may fall apart because ordinary soldiers refuse to fire on their fellow ordinary citizens.

Keeping fingers crossed and watching closely.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 07:45 pm
A long & detailed report from the BBC:

Quote:
3 February 2011 Last updated at 22:17 GMT
Mubarak 'fears chaos if he quits'

Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak has said he would like to resign immediately but fears the country would descend into chaos if he did so.

In his first interview since anti-government protests began, he told ABC News he was "fed up" with power.

It came as Cairo saw another day of violence with clashes between the president's opponents and supporters.

Mr Mubarak warned that the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood party would fill any power vacuum if he stepped down.

The BBC's Paul Adams says this is a version of the narrative the president has used in the past to explain 30 years of political suppression aimed, primarily, at the Brotherhood.

Journalists beaten


Tens of thousands of protesters remain in central Cairo after dark, with some involved in a running battle with government supporters who were attacking them.

Stones have been thrown on both sides, and there has been some gunfire.

The army, which was trying to separate the two sides, appears to have failed to control the crowds.

Egypt's Health Minister Ahmed Samih Farid said that eight people had died in the fighting, which began on Wednesday, and 890 were injured, nine of them critically.

Another person was later reported killed in clashes on Abdel Monem Riyad Square, also in central Cairo. Many more were injured.

The interview is an insight into the defiant mood of Egypt's embattled leader. He insists President Obama has not asked him to leave office immediately and expresses a degree of remorse about the violence on the streets of Cairo.

But he warns if he leaves now, the Muslim Brotherhood will exploit the ensuing chaos.

At a time when Western officials, including some here in Washington, are sounding sanguine about the prospects of the Brotherhood playing a part in Egypt's political transition, President Mubarak appears to be clutching at straws of his own making.


He also says he is fed up with being president - after 62 years of public service he has had enough. For all his defiance, this seems to be a man who knows his days on the world stage are coming to an end. It is still, as ever, a question of precisely when.

The BBC's Khaled Ezzelarab in Cairo says the shift in focus from Tahrir Square to Abdel Monem Riyad Square appears to indicate a strategic advance for the anti-Mubarak protesters, who have managed to hold their ground in Tahrir and move the clashes elsewhere.

Foreign journalists reporting for several organisations were attacked, with reports of Mubarak supporters said to have stormed a number of Cairo hotels.

Some journalists were beaten with sticks and had their equipment smashed.

The New York Times said that two reporters had been released after being detained overnight on Thursday.

The attacks have drawn condemnation from Britain, France, Germany, Italy and Spain, as well as UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon.

"Let me be totally clear: this is outrageous and totally unacceptable, it must stop now," Mr Ban said.

Later in the evening, a number of political activists were arrested by military police, as well as representatives of Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International.

Clutching at straws

Speaking to ABC's Christiane Amanpour, Mr Mubarak denied his administration was behind the violence of the last two days, but said it had troubled him.

"I was very unhappy about yesterday. I do not want to see Egyptians fighting each other," he said.

He said the Muslim Brotherhood was behind the violence.

Mr Mubarak vowed never to leave Egypt

Mr Mubarak vowed never to leave Egypt, saying: "I would never run away from this country. I will die on this soil."

He said it was never his intention to have his son Gamal follow him into office.

Asked how he himself was feeling, he said: "I am feeling strong. I would never run away. I will die on Egyptian soil."

Meanwhile US state department spokesman Philip Crowley has urged Mr Mubarak to move "farther and faster" with the transition.

Earlier Mr Mubarak's deputy, Omar Suleiman, called for time to carry out political reforms before presidential elections in September.

He warned there would be a political vacuum if a proper period of transition was not allowed.

Deep split

In a separate development, the public prosecutor issued a travel ban on three former ministers and a senior member of the ruling party, among them the unpopular former Interior Minister Habib al-Adly.

Correspondents say these legal measures against some of the most powerful people in the country are confirmation of a deep split within the ruling elite.


The public prosecutor's statement said other officials were covered by the ban, which would last "until national security is restored and the authorities and monitoring bodies have undergone their investigations".

Unrest has left about 300 people dead across the country over the past 10 days, according to UN estimates.

If Mr Mubarak does not step down, demonstrators have planned to march on the presidential palace on Friday.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12361948
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 07:48 pm
@msolga,
Quote:
Analysis
Paul Adams BBC News, Washington

The interview is an insight into the defiant mood of Egypt's embattled leader. He insists President Obama has not asked him to leave office immediately and expresses a degree of remorse about the violence on the streets of Cairo.

But he warns if he leaves now, the Muslim Brotherhood will exploit the ensuing chaos.

At a time when Western officials, including some here in Washington, are sounding sanguine about the prospects of the Brotherhood playing a part in Egypt's political transition, President Mubarak appears to be clutching at straws of his own making.

He also says he is fed up with being president - after 62 years of public service he has had enough. For all his defiance, this seems to be a man who knows his days on the world stage are coming to an end. It is still, as ever, a question of precisely when.
0 Replies
 
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 07:49 pm
I hope the soldiers will not fire. I can imagine being there, though I was never much of a marcher. Did stand up once, maybe 30 of us at the highway in front of a county building, no big deal, guys with trucks shouting. Don't mean to isolate that as those women in black stood many more times.
If nothing else, massacre is stupid.

Guys with trucks threatened my 13-14 year old niece there in that city too. Her skin was different. Lot of hostility out there. Interesting visit we had.
cicerone imposter
 
  2  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 07:51 pm
@ossobuco,
Mubarak doesn't want to see chaos, but he's the one who is exacerbating it - with tomorrow's possibility of disaster.

Catch 22?
ossobuco
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 08:04 pm
@cicerone imposter,
I'm not sure I see it as catch 22, might be 37, or, worse, 49.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 08:06 pm
@cicerone imposter,
He's clutching at straws, ci.
Desperately using whatever arguments he believes will "work". Including the Brotherhood bogeyman. (which usually works a treat in the west.)
It's sounding very much like those powerful Egyptians, who actually control what is allowed to occur in the country, are now divided about his future.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 08:25 pm
@msolga,
(Despite Muburak's address to the nation ...)
Quote:
Anti-regime groups are calling for Friday to be Mubarak's "day of departure" and speculation abounds that new protests could rival last Friday's, which erupted soon after midday prayers.


Friday: Mubarak's day of departure?:
http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/spotlight/anger-in-egypt/2011/02/201123204543494799.html
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 08:31 pm
Quote:
During a Senate hearing on Thursday, both Democrats and Republicans pressed a senior Central Intelligence Agency official about when the C.I.A. and other agencies notified President Obama of the looming crisis, and whether intelligence officers even monitored social networking sites and Internet forums to gauge popular sentiment in Egypt.

“At some point it had to have been obvious that there was going to be a huge demonstration,” said Senator Dianne Feinstein, the California Democrat who is chairwoman of the Senate’s Select Committee on Intelligence.

She said that intelligence agencies never sent a notice to her committee about the growing uprising in Egypt, as is customary in the case of significant global events.

Stephanie O’Sullivan, the C.I.A. official, responded that the agency had been tracking instability in Egypt for some time and had concluded that the government in Cairo was in an “untenable” situation. But, Ms. O’Sullivan said, “we didn’t know what the triggering mechanism would be.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/04/world/middleeast/04diplomacy.html?hp

We only spend $250-300 billion a year on intelligence, and some folks expect that pittance to pay for timely useful intelligence??!! Talk about unreasonable *sarcasm*
JPB
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 08:33 pm
NYT - Even as the Obama administration is coalescing around a Mubarak-must-go-now posture in private conversations with Egyptian officials, Mr. Mubarak himself remains determined to stay until the election in September, American and Egyptian officials said. His backers forcibly pushed back on Thursday against what they viewed as American interference in Egypt’s internal affairs.

“What they’re asking cannot be done,” one senior Egyptian official said, citing clauses in the Egyptian Constitution that bar the vice president from assuming power. Under the Constitution, the speaker of Parliament would succeed the president. “That’s my technical answer,” the official added. “My political answer is they should mind their own business.”

Mr. Mubarak’s insistence on staying will again be tested by large street protests on Friday, which the demonstrators are calling his “day of departure,” when they plan to march on the presidential palace. The military’s pledge not to fire on the Egyptian people will be tested as well.
Ionus
 
  4  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 08:34 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
We only spend $250-300 billion a year on intelligence
That would feed over a billion children with change for water and schools.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 08:38 pm
From the Guardian:

Quote:
US hatches Mubarak exit strategy as Egypt death toll mounts
Jack Shenker and Peter Beaumont in Cairo, Harriet Sherwood in Alexandria, Ewen MacAskill in Washington and Julian Borger
The Guardian, Friday 4 February 2011


• White House working on plan for transitional government
• Mubarak: 'If I resign today there will be chaos'
• 10 dead and hundreds injured in fresh crackdown


http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/About/General/2011/2/3/1296766639452/Egypt-political-crisis-008.jpg
Protesters carry away an injured companion in Tahrir square in Cairo. Photograph: Khaled Elfiqi/EPA

The Obama administration is working on a plan in which the Egyptian president, Hosni Mubarak, would stand down immediately in spite of claims yesterday he was intent on clinging on to power until the elections in the autumn.

The White House, the state department and the Pentagon have been involved in discussions that include an option in which Mubarak would given way to a transitional government headed by the Egyptian vice-president, Omar Suleiman. Such a plan has the backing of the Egyptian military, the New York Times reported.

But Mubarak, in an interview with the US media yesterday refused to bow to increasing pressure at home and abroad to stand down immediately, claiming that, though he was fed up and would like to go, he feared chaos if he did so.

In his first major interview since protests began, Mubarak told America's ABC News: "I am fed up. After 62 years in public service, I have had enough. I want to go."

Mubarak expressed no sense of betrayal over Barack Obama's call on Tuesday for him to begin the transition to democracy "now". But there was a hint of resentment when he said Obama did not understand Egyptian culture and the trouble that would ensue if he left office immediately. "If I resign today, there will be chaos," he told ABC's Christiane Amanpour.

Earlier, Suleiman offered political concessions, inviting the long-banned Muslim Brotherhood to a dialogue. However, the Islamist movement and other parties have refused to talk until Mubarak steps down.

The Egyptian regime appeared to have dug in today, defying international pressure to begin an immediate transfer of power while launching attacks on journalists and human rights observers. <cont>


http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/feb/03/egypt-regime-death-toll-tahrir
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  2  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 08:38 pm
@JPB,
Quote:
“What they’re asking cannot be done,” one senior Egyptian official said, citing clauses in the Egyptian Constitution that bar the vice president from assuming power. Under the Constitution, the speaker of Parliament would succeed the president. “That’s my technical answer,” the official added. “My political answer is they should mind their own business.”

$1.5 billion a year buys someone picking up the phone when you call, whether it buys anything more I rather doubt....
0 Replies
 
hawkeye10
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 08:46 pm
@Ionus,
Quote:
That would feed over a billion children with change for water and schools.
I am of the opinion that we could spend all of that money buying pies from Pizza Hut, then air freight them around the world to starving children , and still get more value for our money than we do now. You noticed I am sure that even with our alleged "close military to military relationship" that it has been widely reported that nobody has the first damn clue what goes on in the Egyptian military, thus we have no idea which way this will go.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 08:48 pm
@Ionus,
Hear, hear!
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 08:51 pm
@msolga,
We should go even further; stop all wars, and spend that money for humanity all over the world - rather than wars.
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 08:55 pm
@hawkeye10,
Quote:
You noticed I am sure that even with our alleged "close military to military relationship" that it has been widely reported that nobody has the first damn clue what goes on in the Egyptian military, thus we have no idea which way this will go.


You say this like a normal American, ie. "It's a god-given mandate that we are entitled to stick our noses anywhere we please and when we say jump, everyone must ask, "How high?".

It's this kind of arrogance, coupled with the brutality, the crimes against humanity visited on so many innocents that makes people hate the US. It shouldn't be this way, but the fault clearly lies with y'all.
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 08:57 pm
@cicerone imposter,
The expression of such a kind, Christian thought, CI, immediately earned you a minus 1. Go figure, eh?
0 Replies
 
realjohnboy
 
  6  
Reply Thu 3 Feb, 2011 08:57 pm
I'm going to bed just before 5 am Cairo time.
Here are the 1st couple of lines from an NPR story earlier today about the U.S. aid to Egypt:
Egypt gets tanks, fighter planes and warships.
The U.S. gets flyover rights, desert training exercise sites and expedited passage through the Suez Canal for naval vessels.

As an aside, this has been an amazing thread on A2K. Fast paced, with news from many sources we have access to. I wish, though, that the diversions into Iraq and Bush etc could be posted to the threads devoted to those topics. But, whatever.
I'll see yall in a few hours.
Friday.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.19 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 04:59:29