53
   

Tunesia, Egyt and now Yemen: a domino effect in the Middle East?

 
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Sat 16 Apr, 2011 09:06 pm
@JTT,
The discussion on 'much more' has been moved to,

http://able2know.org/topic/170813-1

If there is any further discussion on 'that that', it will be moved to a new thread.
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Sat 16 Apr, 2011 11:31 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
He's laughing his ass off at your vacant minded suggestion that he list the rules he knows.
Stunning stupidity....It was you not him that was supposed to list all the rules . I thought I told you to keep up ? Is that really the maximum effort you are capable of ? You have no idea who said what.....typical of your arrogance that you felt compelled to make a fool of yourself anyway

Quote:
Obviously, not CI's intent.
YOU READ MINDS ???? OMG !!! No wonder you are delusional...you cant understand your own thoughts with all that traffic going through a dusty country lane .

Quote:
you're batting zero
Sure....you just take a nap.....dont forget to ring for nursey if you have another attack .
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Sat 16 Apr, 2011 11:36 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Quote:
Anus, Aptly named, BTW, for jumping the gun
???? Okaaaayyy....????

Quote:
posting something I revised
So you didnt post it ? What time frame exists around your postings ? Do we wait till you have had your medication or should we interrupt nap time if you pass out in the middle of a post ?

Quote:
English grammar is not so simplistic as you make it out to be.
Unbelievable . I have been explaining that to JoinTalibanTerrorism...perhaps she will believe you .

Silly Female Impersonator.....who's side are you own ? Have you forgotten ?
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Sat 16 Apr, 2011 11:43 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
They were laughable examples of a severely confused mind,
If you are to be the judge, will you examine your own confusion about war crimes ?

Quote:
a little man who thought by reading some nonsense somewhere
Very Happy You so silly !!

Quote:
Why did it take you six pages of dribble to "explain" your "rules", considering that they were stunning examples of simple mindedness?
Oh thats easy...your stupidity and arrogance were great hurdles .

Quote:
As soon as you ran yourself up a stump, which was often, off you would go on another tangent, completely forsaking your "explanations".
You did a lot of whinging about tangents but they werent there...perhaps in your mind they were.....

Quote:
Where is your source for these "rules"? Did you make them up yourself?
I refer you to Silly Female Impersonators post . He is on your side . Very Happy Best asset I could have, you two working together....you make clowns of each other...all I have to do is point out your foibles .
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Sat 16 Apr, 2011 11:47 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
There is little complexity in the knob.......I understand perfectly.
You wouldnt want to exagerate would you ?

per·fect·ly

adverb /ˈpərfik(t)lē/

1. In a manner or way that could not be better
* - the ring fitted perfectly
* - perfectly clean glass bottles

2. Used for emphasis, esp. in order to assert something that has been challenged or doubted
* - you know perfectly well I can't stay


Is there a lot of perfection in you ?

Quote:
Is "a lot" also excluded in your rule? Do the rules of English allow a lot more?
Why dont you read my posts on the matter...I read yours....but it does explain why you are so thick .
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Sat 16 Apr, 2011 11:51 pm
@JTT,
Quote:
The discussion on 'much more' has been moved to,
Oh has it ? You wouldnt be a demanding arrogant useless bitch by any chance would you ? What about the discussion on when to use capitals ? A tangent you introduced . Or that that...the original topic that you lost track of with your usual wandering verbal diarrhea .
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  5  
Reply Sat 16 Apr, 2011 11:54 pm
Okay, you guys win. Another thread trashed. I'll collapse it and wait for the next thing you want to **** up.
JTT
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 17 Apr, 2011 12:07 am
@roger,
Roger the dodger, you've obviously not read the right posts.
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Sun 17 Apr, 2011 12:38 am
@JTT,
Quote:
you've obviously not read the right posts.
Its always someone else's fault isnt it ?
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Sun 17 Apr, 2011 01:01 am
@Ionus,
Don't "continue to squirm in denial", Ionus, for there's a venue for you to discuss your "rules".
Ionus
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 17 Apr, 2011 02:45 am
@JTT,
Quote:
for there's a venue for you to discuss your "rules".
Do you really think you have the moral high ground ? You tell me to go to a thread you started when we have discussed it ad nauseaum here...not everyone has compulsive obsessive disorder like you . Tell me why I should care ? Dont continue to squirm in denial, the topic has been thoroughly covered .
0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 17 Apr, 2011 04:04 am
A sentence posted last night on page 172 of the "Don't tell me there's no proof of evolution" thread.

Quote:
Not that that has anything to do with evolution, because atheism and evolution are not related.
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Sun 17 Apr, 2011 11:06 am
@spendius,
The 'that that' discussion has been moved to,

http://able2know.org/topic/170834-1

0 Replies
 
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2011 08:27 am
Quote:
No people that passes abruptly from a state of subservience under the rule of a despot to the completely unfamiliar state of political independence can be said to have a fair chance of making democratic insitutions work.


Aldous Huxley. Brave New World Revisited.
0 Replies
 
McTag
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2011 09:29 am
@Ionus,

Quote:
And they are incorrect . Like people who use "much more" .



"That that" and "much more" are fine, and of course even necessary in the right circumstances.

Perfectly good English.
cicerone imposter
 
  0  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2011 09:44 am
@McTag,
Hi McT! Ionus is one confused dude on English grammar. Seems he hasn't learned much in school, and spouts nonsense on grammar rules.
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2011 05:50 pm
@McTag,
Quote:
"That that" and "much more" are fine, and of course even necessary in the right circumstances.
Just how do you justify those expressions being "fine" or is that a word you use but dont know the meaning of ?
Quote:
Perfectly good English.
Perfect ? Good English ? Are they perfect or only good ?
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  0  
Reply Tue 19 Apr, 2011 05:51 pm
@cicerone imposter,
It seems Silly Female Impersonator can not see any reason why a different way of saying something would be better or worse .
spendius
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Apr, 2011 04:43 am
An author, famous enough for one of his book titles to have become part of our language and mental furniture, wrote, in a passage about a scientific experiment on the "placebo effect" in the Massachusetts General Hospital----

Quote:
They [[the reactors]] were also much more religious, much more active in the affairs of their church and much more preoccupied, on a subconscious level, with their pelvic and abdominal organs.


Ionus
 
  1  
Reply Wed 20 Apr, 2011 06:35 am
@spendius,
Much is usually qualitative, and when it is used as a quantitative word it is similar to saying "more better" ....the world has already experienced superlative overload....most best....even the Old Spice man needs to up the ante by saying..fresh...fresher...freshest....freshestshist .
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.05 seconds on 10/18/2021 at 10:55:01