@Ionus,
Quote:I try to explain a rule, its usage and exceptions and your response is you don't understand, as though that is a compelling argument .
You call those explanations. They were laughable examples of a severely confused mind, a little man who thought by reading some nonsense somewhere or other, [still refuses to cite any source for the nonsense] he could pump up his Big W writer credentials.
Why did it take you six pages of dribble to "explain" your "rules", considering that they were stunning examples of simple mindedness?
As soon as you ran yourself up a stump, which was often, off you would go on another tangent, completely forsaking your "explanations".
Where is your source for these "rules"? Did you make them up yourself?