@spendius,
Quote:You miss my point revelette. If there is a demand for the strong man to step down, which is from your quote, and which is generally recognised anyway, then it would have existed in Iraq even if not articulated. And the intervention by the coalition would have articulated it.
That the demand has been articulated now must mean that Gadaffi was more liberal than Saddam was.
Actually you miss the point entirely, not surprising really. The point is that if we had taken it upon our selves to knock out Qaddafi without the will of the Libyan people initiating their own desire to overthrow their dictator, then it would have been a western nation invading another Arab country thrusting their own will on the people in Libya. Iraq was not in the midst of protest and a civil war when we invaded their country. We simply went into Iraq on the pretext of WMD and then set up our own version of a interim government. We controlled their country through our military and contractors.
If after Qaddafi is finished, the french or whoever, takes over their government and country, then it would in fact be like Iraq and I imagine, we would quickly find ourselves resented and for good reason. I guess it is a fine line between helping and taking over control.
I don't know what you mean by the last statement. Qaddafi is a little bit liberal I guess in the manner in which he dresses (probably would have been suited as a Hollywood actor or something) , but he is a typical dictator.