53
   

Tunesia, Egyt and now Yemen: a domino effect in the Middle East?

 
 
Finn dAbuzz
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 08:36 pm
@msolga,
Yes, we will have to ask the Iraqi people.

I presume you have not polled a sample of them or the citizens of any other country in the region, despite your certainty concerning what they all think.
msolga
 
  0  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 08:44 pm
Today's report from Robert Fisk (the Independent) , in Cairo.
Lots of on the spot details & information. :


Quote:
How much longer can Mubarak cling on?
Robert Fisk reports from Cairo on the protests that refuse to die
Monday, 31 January 2011
http://www.independent.co.uk/multimedia/dynamic/00544/egypttharir-square-_544937t.jpg
Demonstrators on the streets defy tanks in Tahrir Square

The old lady in the red scarf was standing inches from the front of an American-made M1 Abrams tank of the Egyptian Third Army, right on the edge of Tahrir Square. Its soldiers were paratroops, some in red berets, others in helmets, gun barrels pointed across the square, heavy machine guns mounted on the turrets. "If they fire on the Egyptian people, Mubarak is finished," she said. "And if they don't fire on the Egyptian people, Mubarak is finished." Of such wisdom are Egyptians now possessed.

Shortly before dusk, four F-16 Falcons – again, of course, manufactured by President Barack Obama's country – came screaming over the square, echoes bouncing off the shabby grey buildings and the giant Nasserist block, as the eyes of the tens of thousands of people in the square stared upwards. "They are on our side," the cry went up from the crowds. Somehow, I didn't think so. And those tanks, new to the square, 14 in all that arrived with no slogans pained on them, their soldiers sullen and apprehensive, had not come – as the protesters fondly believed – to protect them.

But then, when I talked to an officer on one of the tanks, he burst out with a smile. "We will never fire on our people – even if we are ordered to do so," he shouted over the roar of his engine. Again, I was not so sure. President Hosni Mubarak – or perhaps we should now say "president" in quotation marks – was at the military headquarters, having appointed his new junta of former military and intelligence officers. The rumour went round the square: the old wolf would try to fight on to the end. Others said it didn't matter. "Can he kill 80 million Egyptians?" ....<cont>



http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/how-much-longer-can-mubarak-cling-on-2198987.html
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 08:46 pm
@msolga,
"Cling on" is the right words. By his nails now.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 08:50 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
I am saying the we are not in their shoes, Finn.
We have not experienced what they have experienced.
And that it is not for us to to make such assessments, second hand.
It is surely up to them to make that assessment.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 08:53 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Have you been following Robert Fisk's reports, ci?
I think they've been some of the most informative & interesting I've read.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 08:57 pm
@msolga,
Not really. I've tried to follow this thread for most of my information, but I do happen to listen in on some news on TV.
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 09:02 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Me, too.
But I've been particularly impressed by his on the spot reporting from Cairo.
Informative & insightful.
He's lived in the middle east since around the 1970s sometime & is practically a "local".

LionTamerX
 
  5  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 09:07 pm
http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/8345/middlewho.jpg

According to Fox, Egypt has decided to relocate their entire country to Iraq. I don't think any of us saw that coming.
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 09:36 pm
@msolga,
People like Fisk who has lived in the area for a very long time has a better feel for whats happening, so it's not surprising his reporting is more insightful than most others.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  0  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 09:36 pm
Well, it sure makes bromides about outside influences that much easier . . .
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 09:40 pm

bencnn benwedeman
Hearing TE Data, main Egyptian internet service provider, will maintain internet interruption for at least another week. #Jan25 #Egypt
46 minutes ago

cnnbrk CNN Breaking News
#Egypt President Mubarak to new PM: Engage with all political parties http://on.cnn.com/fIbHe8
55 minutes ago
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 09:41 pm
@LionTamerX,
Freaking hilarious.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  -1  
Reply Sun 30 Jan, 2011 09:55 pm
@ossobuco,
ossobuco wrote:
What is with Miss Clinton? I can only assume you have heard of the addressives, Ms. or Mrs.


Bite me, lush.
0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  2  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2011 12:49 am
@Lash,
This is a post directed to Lash, not to anyone else.

I had decided earlier in the day that I would not respond to your post, directed specifically at me, but now I do want to get this off my chest.
I found this post of yours particularly unpleasant.

I want to ask you what precisely I've actually posted that has caused this nastiness. And I think your post is personal, despite what you say.

Quote:
You just want to make whatever half-baked comment you please and run off without being held accountable for what you say. This is what's going to happen: When I have an agreement, disagreement or question that I think merits a comment, I'm going to make the comment - just like I do with everyone else. If your delicate sensibilities can't withstand that, put me on ignore. If you repeat that behavior when someone has the audacity to actually question what you say, pretty soon, you'll be here all by yourself, happily spewing whatever wrongheaded pablum excretes from your perfectly correct keyboard, without the pesky bother of anyone's irritating questions or redirection.


For the record, I have probably posted as much information related to this subject as anyone else on this thread. You can check on that if you like.
My opinions are based on my reading from various news sources. But they happen to be different to your interpretations. I can't see why differences of opinion cannot co-exist & be debated on a thread like this. In fact, many would see such debate as a useful function of the thread.

The "wrongheaded pablum excretes from my perfectly correct keyboard" is nothing that has not already been said in any number of analysis articles on the situation in Egypt . If I agree with that analysis, so what? You can provide counter-arguments, as I've said before.

I do not have any problem what-so-ever about debating different interpretations of events in the middle east with you at all. Why on earth would I want to put you on "ignore" ? Your posts do not threaten me in the least.

When have I "gotten weird" when people have disagreed with me? Show me actual examples of this "weirdness".

Lash, you have posted comments like these which are your own opinion, nothing else.:

Quote:
I think what may be found is that the populace in Egypt was happier under Mubarak than they will be under whatever regime they install.


Quote:
The possibilities include some scary stuff. Although Arabs aren't a monolithic group, so to speak, they can get aligned together over a few things....one being a final solution for their favorite neighbor, Israel. Still, right now - hoping for self-determination through a relatively peaceful process.


I have not attacked you for them.
Nor have I asked you to clarify what you've said, or back up your claims with evidence.
Perhaps I should have.
What is the basis of these claims of yours?
Nor have I suggested you somehow lift your game with your posts, as you have suggested to me.

Quote:
And, if you will take just the slightest notice, everyone who shares an opinion on this thread is called upon to explain, support or clarify their views. So are you

Today I posted (yet another) lengthy response to questions in one of your posts. (Including the suggestion that I was now - finally! - in agreement with George Bush's foreign policy in the middle east.)
I usually make the effort to respond to such to such questions. I don't avoid or ignore them.

But no response from you to what I posted.






0 Replies
 
msolga
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2011 02:22 am
Quote:
'Mega protest' planned in Egypt

Opposition movement calls for "a million people demonstration" on Tuesday in a bid to topple president Hosni Mubarak.

Last Modified: 31 Jan 2011 07:19 GMT
http://english.aljazeera.net/mritems/Images/2011/1/31/201113151636433621_20.jpg
Egyptian opposition leader Mohamed ElBaradei spoke to protesters at Tahrir Square in Cairo on Sunday [Reuters]

Egyptian protesters have called for a massive demonstration on Tuesday in a bid to force out president Hosni Mubarak from power.

The so-called April 6 Movement said it plans to have more than a million people on the streets of the capital Cairo, as anti-government sentiment reaches a fever pitch.

Several hundred demonstrators remained camped out in Tahrir square in central Cairo early on Monday morning, defying a curfew that has been extended by the army.

"It seems as if they are saying: 'We are here to stay. We are re-invigorating our movement and we are not going anywhere'," one of Al Jazeera's correspondents in Cairo said.

Protesters seem unfazed by Mubarak's pledge to institute economic and political reforms. Our correspondent said that people feel that such pledges "are too little, too late".

Early on Monday morning, unconfirmed reports said the police had been ordered back on the streets.

"We are expecting a statement by the minister of interior about whether the police are going to return or not," our correspondent said.

"The absence of police has given looters a free rein, forcing ordinary citizens to set up neighbourhood patrols. Many people are wondering where the police disappeared to.

"There are two schools of thought as far as the police are concerned: One is that many of them decided to join the protesters. The other is that the regime was saying to the people, 'You want to protest. We'll pull back the police and you feel what anarchy feels like'," our correspondent said.

A day earlier, Mohamed ElBaradei, a leading opposition figure, joined thousands of protesters in Tahrir Square.

The former head of the International Atomic Energy Agency told the crowd on Sunday night that "what we have begun cannot go back" referring to days of anti-government protests.

The National Coalition for Change, which groups several opposition movements including the Muslim Brotherhood, wants ElBaradei to negotiate with the Mubarak government.

"The people want the regime to fall," protesters chanted as ElBaradei walked to the centre of the square, holding hands with some demonstrators. ... <cont>


http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/2011/01/20111316148317175.html
0 Replies
 
hingehead
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2011 03:55 am
Latest tweets


alaa Alaa Abd El Fattah
by bencnn
neighbourhood watch committees kicked out police from downtown cairo, they are not welcome #Jan25
3 minutes ago
»

bencnn benwedeman
Lots of gunfire in Maadi. Many foreigners, Egyptians have left or are leaving. Stores full of buyers stocking up. #Jan28
0 Replies
 
Ionus
 
  3  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2011 04:40 am
In our news, one reporter was stopped many times from the Cairo airport to the Cairo hotel and each time was addressed very politely and waved through quickly. So far an excellent example of how to run a revolution. Fingers crossed for Egypt.
0 Replies
 
revelette
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2011 08:34 am
@Lash,
Lash said:
Quote:
When you say things like this - and a few other statements that were or seemed unsupportable, this is what you can expect: to support it or withdraw it. Those have been the rules since I've been here.

Quote:
I see his government & the US as having been mutually dependent, to date.



Quote:
Lash, I have said (twice now, in response to your questions) that I do not believe the US is “controlling the protesters” or “running the revolution” in Egypt.



I think I get what she was trying to say. While the military could very well keep Mubarak in power, the US is a big ally for Egypt and their influence and words can go a long way in determining what Mubarak would do. Msolga left an article a few pages back which said something like it looked like Mubarak got the message from US that wiping out hundreds of protesters is out of the question. So he has no choice but to give in if the protesters don't give up.

0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2011 10:42 am
What if the Muslim Brotherhood Comes Out on Top?
Jan 30 2011, 5:45 PM ET
By
Jeffrey Goldberg
A Goldblog reader writes to ask:

How could you support a revolution in Egypt that you know will end with the Muslim Brotherhood in power, the Israel-Egypt peace treaty dead, and the further empowering of Hamas in Gaza and even in the West Bank?

Well, I don't know that all these things are inevitable. The Muslim Brotherhood might not end up in power; just as in Pakistan, the Islamists in Egypt represent only a minority of citizens. Which is not to say that the Brotherhood couldn't wind up in power, but it's too early to call the rise of the Brotherhood inevitable. If the Brothers do end up in power, then the Israeli-Egyptian peace treaty, which is responsible for 30 years of stability in the eastern Mediterranean, would be in mortal danger, but even if Egypt were to break relations with Israel, this does not mean that war would necessarily follow. And what is more likely is that the Egyptian Army continues to play an important and stabilizing role, and the Egyptian Army, of course, depends on the United States for much of its budget, and it does not want to lose access to American-made weapons systems, which is what might happen if Egypt were to abrogate the peace treaty.

In any case, the "stability" created in the Middle East by autocratic regimes is an illusion, as we've learned again and again. There is ultimately no alternative to freedom and self-government. As Elliott Abrams has noted, the Arab world is not exceptional in this regard. I've gone back and forth on this question any number of times, but ultimately I have to come down on the side of people like Reuel Gerecht, who argue that the imposition of ostensibly pro-Western autocrats on Muslim populations leads to nothing good in the end. If President Bush had carried through his worthy freedom agenda (and if President Obama had picked up the standard of democratic change) Hosni Mubarak might have long ago been convinced to seek retirement before his people sought it for him, and today we would be watching orderly elections in Egypt in which the Muslim Brotherhood represented one choice among many, and not images of Cairo.

--theatlantic.com
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Mon 31 Jan, 2011 10:47 am
I seriously doubt that the military in Egypt would allow the Muslim Brotherhood to form a government.
 

Related Topics

 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 11/23/2024 at 05:42:46