3
   

The United States Constitution

Forums: Politics, Constitution
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Jan, 2011 12:34 pm
@H2O MAN,
farmerman wrote:

AT least JTT seems to be in touch with facts. Still insisting that the US Constitution doesnt include any AMendments?
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Jan, 2011 12:40 pm
@H2O MAN,
I believe JTT is in touch with farmerman's tea baggage... this makes Walter Hinteler uncomfortably happy.
Walter Hinteler
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Jan, 2011 01:03 pm
@H2O MAN,
Fine, if you think so.

Though it doesn't answer the question.

Which should be very easy for any American who went there to a school.

However, on the other hand, if you really got your school diploma by collecting enough green shield stamps from your local trading post (one time, you got them with tequila, I've heard) ....
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Jan, 2011 01:05 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
Even a self proclaimed intellectual such as yourself should recognize farmergirl's fabrication.
farmerman
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Jan, 2011 02:09 pm
@H2O MAN,
Are you saying Im lying spurt? I can attach your comments on a post to refresh your senile old mind.

Walter, I dont think spurt ever graduated from high school. I submit that he got a certificate of attendance with no transcript, even his school system had some standards beneath which they would not go.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Jan, 2011 02:25 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

Are you saying Im lying?


Maybe, but let's start out with what you think you got so very wrong.
farmerman
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Jan, 2011 02:46 pm
@H2O MAN,
Quote:
Maybe, but let's start out with what you think you got so very wrong
Thats your job genius. I got nothing wrong. You made the idotic pronouncements
1Slavery Is nopt mentioned in the Constitution (several people called you on this)

2When presented with the information, you backpedaled by stating (AND THIS IS NO ****),
"The word aslavery appears in an amendment and amendments are NOT part of the Constitution.(If I were you spurt, I would do lots of remedial PAD before posting too much about anything besides water softeners)
H2O MAN
 
  -2  
Reply Sat 8 Jan, 2011 03:24 pm
@farmerman,
Hey dipshit, your panties sure are bunched up tight Laughing

You're not making any sense, why don't you settle down, wash the sand from your vag and get your **** together.
JTT
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Jan, 2011 03:44 pm
@H2O MAN,
I'm beginning to understand just how deep this delusion can go. Here we have a guy who has been caught out with absolutely zero wiggle room and still he tries to bluff/lie his way out of it.

It's downright Finnian is what it is.

How do people like this function in day to day life? How is it that that perpetual whine about the importance of personal integrity/personal responsibility ceases to exist when it comes to him/them?

H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Sat 8 Jan, 2011 04:13 pm
@JTT,
You're that guy.
0 Replies
 
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 05:00 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Walter Hinteler wrote:

farmerman wrote:

AT least JTT seems to be in touch with facts.[Is that an oxymoron? David]
Still insisting that the US Constitution doesnt include any AMendments?

The ORIGINAL Constitution of 1787,
went into effect in 1789 with no amendments.

The Bill of Rights, i.e., the FIRST ten amendments
went into effect, by ratification, on December 15, 1791.





David
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 06:22 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

The ORIGINAL Constitution of 1787,
went into effect in 1789 with no amendments.

The Bill of Rights, i.e., the FIRST ten amendments
went into effect, by ratification, on December 15, 1791.
[/quote]

I don't think that anyone doubted this (perhaps waterman didn't know it), but that wasn't the question.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 06:36 am
@Walter Hinteler,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

The ORIGINAL Constitution of 1787,
went into effect in 1789 with no amendments.

The Bill of Rights, i.e., the FIRST ten amendments
went into effect, by ratification, on December 15, 1791.
[/quote]
Walter Hinteler wrote:
I don't think that anyone doubted this (perhaps waterman didn't know it), but that wasn't the question.
Y did u remove my quote
from the quote box and leave it empty ??





David
farmerman
 
  0  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 06:56 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Quote:
The ORIGINAL Constitution of 1787,
went into effect in 1789 with no amendments.

The Bill of Rights, i.e., the FIRST ten amendments
went into effect, by ratification, on December 15, 1791.


Whats your point? We all know this. My point with spurt was

Quote:
AT least JTT seems to be in touch with facts. SPURT is Still insisting that the US Constitution doesnt include any AMendments

The word DOESNT implies present tense. Spurt is under the opinion that the Constitution does NOT include its complement of AMendments. HE would be dead wrons, AS WOULD YOU IF YOU AGREED WITH THAT POINT> Please dont try to defend the indefensible.
OmSigDAVID
 
  2  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 07:03 am
@farmerman,
I don 't wanna be "dead wrons"
farmerman
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 07:07 am
@OmSigDAVID,
U offen r
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 07:13 am
@farmerman,
How many "wrons" r dead?
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 08:31 am
@OmSigDAVID,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

Y did u remove my quote
from the quote box and leave it empty ??
David
[/quote]

Don't know how I did it - wasn't intended at all.
OmSigDAVID
 
  1  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 09:09 am
@Walter Hinteler,
OmSigDAVID wrote:

Y did u remove my quote
from the quote box and leave it empty ??
David
[/quote]
Walter Hinteler wrote:
Don't know how I did it - wasn't intended at all.
U recidivated.





David
farmerman
 
  0  
Reply Tue 11 Jan, 2011 10:37 am
@OmSigDAVID,
Its an accidental thing Dave, dont get paranoid.
Ive done it many times, sometimes, when I have seriatem quotes ,the quote box often defaults back to the beginning of my post and I, in desperation, just type out the quote boxes. When I hit send, often a stray Quote box with nothing in it appears.

The Atlantic Monthly's web site posted what it felt were the beginnings opf hate speech and I must swy that you fit the bill in their item 2.
"If anyone disagrees with you, you call them "Traitor". That, is , according to the ATlantic, is inchoate haate speech, just woiting to become fully formed.

 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The United States Constitution
  3. » Page 2
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/02/2025 at 09:31:11
▲ ▼