1
   

Chiraq bans Muslim head scarves in State Schools

 
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Sep, 2004 05:47 pm
Interesting ...

Nun identity photos start veil debate
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Sep, 2004 09:41 am
Between 100 and 120 French students have refused to abide by a ban on head scarves in schools, according to the first official tally released since French schools opened last Thursday. French Education Minister Francois Fillon made the announcement, adding that many of the students were in talks with school officials. The regulation, approved last spring, bars conspicuous religious symbols and attire in all public schools in France. The law has also impacted many in the French Sikh community.


Quote:
Up to 120 Girls Defy French Head Scarf Ban
Up to 120 Girls Defy French Law Banning Islamic Head Scarves in Classrooms, Minister Says

The Associated Press

PARIS Sept. 8, 2004
Source
0 Replies
 
cjhsa
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Sep, 2004 09:51 am
Vlad The Impaler once had Moslem Nobles visit his court. When he requested that they remove their Turbans they refused stating that it weas against their religion and as an Non-Believer he could not order them to do so...

So Vlad had a few of his Men seize the Moslem Nobles and Nail the Turbans securely with sharp nails.

Perfect - they come to school wearing these things, pin them up on the wall.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Sep, 2004 12:00 pm
Glad to see a revival of this topic

From what I can gather, the hajib ban has been accepted, helped of course by threatening to kill French hostages if it was enforced. Muslim girls might prefer to wear the scarf but many made a point of not wearing it in protest at the kidnapping of the two French journalists.

So a small victory for common sense and the French constitution.and a worthy example to the rest of the world.

No doubt the radical muslims who are holding the journalists are now demanding that muslims all wear the scarf. In which case I hope they all do, to get them released and then never wear them again.
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Oct, 2004 04:10 pm
Quote:


REUTERS
Oct. 7, 2004

TOULON, France - The French law meant to banish Muslim headscarves from state schools is finding unexpected targets in southern France, where some principals have begun turning away Roman Catholic chaplains.

Five priests have been barred from state schools in the Var region despite the fact that French law has long allowed them entry to meet Catholic pupils there, according to the local diocesan spokesman Father Charles Mallard.

One school in this Mediterranean port city barred a priest this week because he was wearing a cassock, the traditional black robe he wore last year without problem before the new law barring conspicuous religious symbols came into force. [..]

French lawmakers this year banned "conspicuous religious symbols" and indicated this meant the headscarf, the Jewish skullcap and large Christian crosses.

This has created problems for Sikh pupils, who now cannot wear their turbans although they are not a religious symbol, and now raised questions about the loophole in France's strict secularism that allows chaplains to work at state schools.

The teachers' union, SNES, supported the schools' stand, saying in a statement, "The law on secularism applies not only to pupils, but to teachers and other personnel who are part of the teaching or logistical staff of a school." [..]

"How can you explain to pupils that the law is the same for everyone if we make an exception like that?" asked Jean-Pierre Andrau, a history teacher at the lycee where Father Antoine Galland was turned away.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Wed 2 Mar, 2005 05:10 am
This is crazy

There will now be a competition amongst Muslim school girls to show who is the more devout. (Encouraged by adult muslim males).

And recriminations against those not considered devout enough by the pious jilbab wearing fanatics.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/beds/bucks/herts/4310545.stm
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2005 10:33 am
Quote:
France's ban on veils judged a success

Paris, France, Jun. 2 (UPI) -- French officials say the controversial law banning Muslim headscarves and other religious symbols in public schools is yielding results.

A year after the ban on religious symbols went into effect, education officials say the legislation has improved the integration of students into French public schools.

Passed last spring, the legislation bans students from wearing Islamic headscarves, Catholic crosses, Jewish skullcaps or other religious symbols to public schools.

Only 47 students have been expelled from school since the academic year started last fall, according to the Ministry of Education. Most were Muslim girls who refused to take off their veils.

A number of conservative Muslim leaders, along with those from other faiths -- including Sikhs -- strongly criticized the legislation.
Source
0 Replies
 
NewSoul
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2005 03:50 pm
France is now an example to the world on how Anti-Freedom they are by not letting people wear whatever they feel like wearing.

God Bless America who stands for Freedom. Americans would never agree with what the French have done to their society. Chirac and his group are the Taliban of Europe.

When Muslim women choose to wear the Hijab many say they wear that against their will which is totally untrue. When Catholic sisters cover their hair people say they are the best of women , who are devoted to worship God and when Muslim women wear the veil to worship God, many object that out of jealousy and hatred or for no reason. What a Controversy !!!!

Guys, people are free to do whatever they feel like even if they choose to live different than your beliefs.

Freedom and tolerance is what we should stand for.

You guys are so arrogant and selfish. Leave Muslims alone. Leave Christians Catholics, Jews alone if they all wanna worship as long as they don't bother anybody.

Michael
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Thu 2 Jun, 2005 11:01 pm
Well, we our pupils can wear here what they want: they are not forced to wear e.g. school uniforms.

(But teachers can't wear religious symbols symbols like head scarfs: seperation of church and state.)

France sees this more consequently.

I agree that you can focus on this from different point of views, and I agree as well that what is done here in Europe is the wrong way.

ANY pupil should be allowed to wear what she/he wants!
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Jun, 2005 12:55 pm
....and being teenagers they certainly would.

and they may, after school.

Of course in an ideal world yes let them wear what they want. But does that include T shirts with political slogans or offensive remarks? Unfortunately we do not live in an ideal world.

There has to be some dress code for children at school in my opinion.

[hardly daring to express opinion differing from H Hinteler ... Smile]
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Jun, 2005 01:00 pm
Steve (as 41oo wrote:
Of course in an ideal world yes let them wear what they want. But does that include T shirts with political slogans or offensive remarks?

Why not? Where I went to school, pupils had a lot of political slogans, "FU"s, and similar stuff on their T-shirts. I don't remember any trouble in school coming from this.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Jun, 2005 01:16 pm
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:

[hardly daring to express opinion differing from H Hinteler ... Smile]


Thomas wrote:
Steve (as 41oo wrote:
Of course in an ideal world yes let them wear what they want. But does that include T shirts with political slogans or offensive remarks?

Why not? Where I went to school, pupils had a lot of political slogans, "FU"s, and similar stuff on their T-shirts. I don't remember any trouble in school coming from this.


We were worse, but that was a long time before Thomas went to school.
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Jun, 2005 01:18 pm
Hi thomas. nice to "see you" again

but what do you do with the boy who wants to wear neo nazi uniform?

Or the girl who demands the schools is modified to allow her to wear the shadoor or burkha?
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Jun, 2005 01:29 pm
Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
but what do you do with the boy who wants to wear neo nazi uniform?

You tell him to wear something else, on the basis that his uniform is threatening to other pupils.

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
Or the girl who demands the schools is modified to allow her to wear the shadoor or burkha?

No problem. Shadoors and burkhas don't threaten anyone.

Nice to see you too, Steve!
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Jun, 2005 02:41 pm
So the boy cant wear just anything at all. There are some limits.

Agree the burkha does not threaten anyone, but that wasnt really my point. What I meant was that if a girl wore "extreme" Islamic dress, and this was accepted by the school, then she could demand that the physical structure of the school buildings, stairways, changing rooms, gymnasium facilities etc should be altered to enable her to wear her religious clothing safely.
0 Replies
 
Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Jun, 2005 02:54 pm
Steve --

Imagine, for a moment, that this is a freedom of speech thread. You and I probably agree that I don't have the right to say to you: "Your money or your life!" Probably we also agree that this is not really a freedom of speech issue. Similarly, when someone wears a Neo-Nazi uniform, he is in effect saying: "I am ready to beat up some Turks and some Blacks!" This is in effect a threat against other pupils. Such threats cannot be tolerated, but the limits to tolerance here are about tolerance for pupils threatening one another. They are no more about "freedom of clothing" than proscribing "Your money or your life" is about freedom of speech. As long as clothing styles are merely worn as a statement about oneself, not as a threat against other, all of them should be tolerated in my humble opinion. I have only good experiences with the laissez-faire way of handling this.

Steve (as 41oo) wrote:
What I meant was that if a girl wore "extreme" Islamic dress, and this was accepted by the school, then she could demand that the physical structure of the school buildings, stairways, changing rooms, gymnasium facilities etc should be altered to enable her to wear her religious clothing safely.

No. Well, she could demand it, but you would be under no obligation to meet the demand. She has the right to wear whatever clothes she sees fit, you have the right to build your school in whatever way you see fit. You have no obligation to her other than to tolerate her choice of clothes.

(It's getting late here. Greetings to Ros, and good night! Smile )
0 Replies
 
Steve 41oo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 6 Jun, 2005 03:01 pm
and to you
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Sep, 2005 03:14 pm
Hhmmm ... I doubted for a while in what kind of thread to post this gem of a news item ... and decided on this one.

The SGP is a Dutch Christian party. Protestant of the most hardcore variety. No sports on Sunday. No TV (last year for the first time ever the party leader took part in a TV discussion). And: no full party membership for women. They're not allowed to fulfill any official function in the party.

The SGP has had either 2 or 3 seats in parliament ever since the universal right to vote was given in Holland, in 1919. As a parliamentary party, it receives a degree of state funding. Now, it's in trouble.

Quote:
de Volkskrant [my translation]
8 September 2005

Court: state subsidy to discriminating SGP unlawful

THE HAGUE - The state has to suspend its subsidy to the State Reformed Party (SGP). This was determined by the court in The Hague on Wednesday, because the SGP discriminates women. Minister Remkes (Interior Affairs) is considering to appeal.

Women in the SGP can only become 'extraordinary member'. That means that they can not take on any administrative function, and are not allowed to interfere in party affairs. The SGP bases its point of view on phrases from the bible.

According to the Hague court subsidying the SGP is therefore a breach of the Womens Treaty [or Convention] of the United Nations. In that treaty it says that the state 'should take appropriate measures to banish the discrimination of women in political and public spheres'. The state neglects to do so with the SGP, according to the judge. In fact, womens discrimination is subsidised. [..]

The SGP receives 800 thousand Euro in state subsidies on an annual basis, plus another 300 thousand for the wages of the two members of parliament and their administrative support. The SGP's annual budget is 1,4million Euro.
0 Replies
 
dlowan
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Sep, 2005 03:36 pm
This has actually come up in Australia, now.


There is no tradition in Oz of not allowing people to wear religious stuff in state schools. Jews can wear yamulkas, catholics can wear crucifixes etc.

A couple of ultraright bright sparks in the federal (conservative) government tried to say that the wearing of head scarves was a "challenge" to Australia, and shouldn't be allowed.

The prime minister, most of the rest of the party and the opposition all scotched it immediately.


Who are the SGP, Nimh? Are they a Muslim party?
0 Replies
 
nimh
 
  1  
Reply Fri 9 Sep, 2005 03:38 pm
dlowan wrote:
Who are the SGP, Nimh? Are they a Muslim party?

No, thats the interesting bit. Read my post again.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

700 Inconsistencies in the Bible - Discussion by onevoice
Why do we deliberately fool ourselves? - Discussion by coincidence
Spirituality - Question by Miller
Oneness vs. Trinity - Discussion by Arella Mae
give you chills - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence for Evolution! - Discussion by Bartikus
Evidence of God! - Discussion by Bartikus
One World Order?! - Discussion by Bartikus
God loves us all....!? - Discussion by Bartikus
The Preambles to Our States - Discussion by Charli
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.07 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 10:20:35