10
   

Everyone Has This Tax Argument Wrong

 
 
chai2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 02:27 pm
@blueveinedthrobber,
blueveinedthrobber wrote:

I have certainly been guilty of that and I paid a price for it. we all make mistakes, the idea is to learn from them.


Well Bear, you can go to meet your maker knowing you have served as a warning to others.

Very Happy
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 02:31 pm
@chai2,
Works for me. I've been told that I am most useful as a bad example for the kids.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 02:38 pm
The good news: Obama's plan to increase taxes suffered a major set back today.

The bad news: 13 additional months of unfunded unemployment compensation.

A better deal for all involved would have cut some taxes and extended unemployment compensation for no more than 6 months.

Obama is holding the American people hostage.
0 Replies
 
Brand WTF
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 02:49 pm
Get ready for unemployment checks to be extended beyond that....there's no way around it... people are going to need the help in the prolonged jobless 'recovery'.

The upside is every one of these dollars that goes into the economy generates two.
H2O MAN
 
  0  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 02:58 pm
@Brand WTF,
Brand WTF wrote:



The upside is every one of these dollars that goes into the economy generates two.


Every unfunded unemployment dollar that goes into the economy generates two additional dollars of unfunded debt.

Obamanomics, you've got to love it Drunk
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 03:42 pm
@Brand WTF,
I don't follow the reasoning. If I steal a dollar from you, sure I'll spend it. I don't know anyone suggesting a two to one multiple, but take it from me: the dollar I spend to stimulate the economy is a dollar you won't spend.
chai2
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 03:52 pm
@roger,
roger wrote:

Works for me. I've been told that I am most useful as a bad example for the kids.


roger, I think all 3 of us serve in that capcity.

We should probably go around to the schools, so the teachers can say "Don't end up like this!"
0 Replies
 
Brand WTF
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 03:59 pm
@roger,
There are, according to studies, economic multipliers that take effect.

Maybe the the angle you posited exposes a fallacy to the theory.

Take it up with an economist. Smile

roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 04:08 pm
@Brand WTF,
That's kind of dismissive, but I assure you, not all economists are named John Maynard Keynes.
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 04:15 pm
@roger,
roger wrote:

That's kind of dismissive, but I assure you, not all economists are named John Maynard Keynes.


Only the good ones.

By the way, taxes aren't stealing. You spend a considerable amount of time every day enjoying the services of government; paying for those services isn't stealing from anyone, but rather, asking you to do your duty as a citizen.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Brand WTF
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 04:15 pm
@roger,
Here's a lil exerpt from WSJ.

"Every dollar spent on unemployment insurance has the effect of $2 spent in the economy, according to a report the Labor Department will release this week.

The report, commissioned by the Bush administration and conducted by research firm IMPAQ International and the Urban Institute think tank, showed an average of 1.6 million jobs were preserved each quarter because of unemployment insurance and 1.8 million job losses were averted in the depths of the current recession.

"When you give a dollar to the unemployed they're the most likely to spend it," said Betsey Stevenson, the Labor Department's chief economist."
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 04:34 pm
Quote:
Why do Republicans support a payroll tax holiday?
by Jed Lewison
Tue Dec 07, 2010 at 01:56:25 PM PST

By far, the single biggest new piece of stimulus in the Obama-GOP tax deal is the temporary one year reduction of individual Social Security payroll taxes from 6.2% to 4.2%.

That one measure alone will inject $120 billion into the economy next year, and because it only applies to the first $106,000 of each taxpayer's income, the vast majority of that $120 billion will go to people who will actually spend it, in the process, strengthening the economy.

So if the payroll tax holiday will (a) stimulate the economy and (b) primarily benefit middle-income taxpayers, then why do you think Republicans are agreeing to it?

The answer to that question should figure prominently into whether you support or oppose this deal, and at least to me, there's only one answer that makes sense: Republicans see the payroll tax holiday as yet another tax trap.

Here's why it's a trap: the deal calls for the payroll tax holiday to last for just one year. That means on January 1, 2012, payroll taxes would go back up to 6.2%.

Put another way, the Republican message in 2011 will be this: "If Congress doesn't extend the payroll tax holiday, everybody's taxes are going up on January 1, 2012."

If you don't think Republicans that's exactly what Republicans will say, then you haven't been paying attention. Not only will they demand an extension of the payroll tax holiday, they'll make extending it permanently the centerpiece of their 2012 Presidential campaign.

Given that the economy is likely to still be in lousy shape shape one year from now, extending the payroll tax holiday will probably be politically popular. So there will be tremendous pressure on Democrats to extend it. The problem is, extending it would threaten Social Security. And extending it permanently would kill Social Security as we know it.

The issue isn't whether we can afford a temporary one year payroll tax holiday. We can. In fact, doing so would help the economy. But as is painfully obviously, in this political climate, there's no such thing as a "temporary" tax cut.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that cutting the employee side of the payroll tax from 6.2% to 4.2% on a permanent basis will force massive cuts in Social Security benefits. Republicans certainly understand the implications. And that's why they want this payroll tax holiday -- because it will help them undermine the entire Social Security system.

Sure, it would be wildly irresponsible to risk the entire Social Security system. But these are Republicans we're talking about. They live for this kind of stuff.

Could Democrats hold the line and refuse to extend the payroll tax cut? In theory, yes. But it would require good messaging. And you'd have to be crazy to depend on Democrats to do a good job with messaging.

So even though the payroll tax holiday would provide some short-term stimulus, in the long-run it will jeopardize the future of Social Security. It's being sold as a concession on the part of Republicans, but it's not a concession, it's a trap that Democrats should avoid.


This whole deal is terrible and the Dems in the House should scuttle the entire thing. let the taxes go up and blame the Republicans relentlessly for it. Then force them to compromise when they try and push through the tax bills in January, rather than the other way around....

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 04:53 pm
@Brand WTF,
Can you link that article?
Brand WTF
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 05:43 pm
@roger,
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703670004575616863209401130.html
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 05:56 pm
Various sources are now reporting that there is far too much opposition to this 'plan' in both chambers of Congress for it to pass without significant changes.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 05:59 pm
which probably translates to even more concessions to the republicans.
roger
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 06:11 pm
@Brand WTF,
That's some outstanding research, Brand.

I'm still not buying into that multiplier based on an anticipated DOL report, but my argument is with the expected report, not you.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 7 Dec, 2010 06:24 pm
@blueveinedthrobber,
blueveinedthrobber wrote:

which probably translates to even more concessions to the republicans.


Maybe, but it's the Dems who are leading the charge against passing it in both chambers. The Republicans are ecstatic about it. Sure, they bitch a bit about the UE extension and what-not, but they know that the 2% haircut to SS and the failure to de-couple the tax rates is a gigantic and total victory for their cause.

If we're lucky, we could end up getting our wish after all - all of the tax cuts expiring.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
Advocate
 
  1  
Reply Wed 8 Dec, 2010 01:17 pm
This pending deal between the right and the left makes a mockery of the right's claim that it is a deficit hawk. The deal may just spin the deficit compleetly out of control.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Thu 9 Dec, 2010 11:57 am
Quote:
Pelosi won't hold vote on Obama's tax plan -aide

Dec 9 (Reuters) - U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi will not bring President Barack Obama's current proposed tax plan up for a vote in her chamber, an aide said on Thursday.

The aide said Pelosi would require changes be made to the measure that most of her fellow House Democrats formally opposed by approving a resolution of opposition to it. The aide said: "She (Pelosi) will honor the resolution."


At least the House is doing the right thing. Now, will Obama man up and take control of this? Or will he bow to pressure again and again?

I cannot think of a single thing that will be more pivotal for Obama, in terms of motivating people like me to not only vote but actively WORK for his re-election, than what ends up happening on this tax cuts for the rich issue. It is my core issue and the most important one facing our society at this time, by a country mile.

Cycloptichorn
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.06 seconds on 12/23/2024 at 07:22:39