I’m glad Dasein is at least honest enough to set you straight on you attempting to speak for him.
An improvement in your perceptions would indeed come from you, that's the point in him posting
Dasein appears to be talking about root perception, while most people talk about the ‘conscious perception’ that you become aware (or conscious) of. What we see/hear/sense undergoes translation as it is filtered through various systems in our mind, until it reaches our ‘consciousness’ where we become aware of our perceptions. As many of those filters (beliefs, values, emotional attachments etc) are constructed, we can improve our perceptions by improving the constructions, and also by improving our awareness of the systems intimate to the thing we are viewing. All of these will affect our end perception. From this viewpoint, Dasein is in error that you cannot improve your perceptions.
Don't attempt to blame it on 'Dasein', you're wasting your time by dis-covering your own flaws and trying to blame them on him. This is why he ignores you.
I’m not particularly worried to be on ignore – having been polite but disagreeing with him, it is his loss to shut out outside thoughts and challenges. And I do think you’ll find that (challenging his line of thinking, and asking him to justify the labels he attaches to others) is the reason for his choice to ignore
Your perception of ‘blame’ is misplaced (though what exactly you mean is unclear, but I will take a guess at it). Considering he apparently believes he is perfection (the ‘don’t argue with me, I’m extending an invitation for all of you to grow’ attitude) it’s still amusing to post how he isn’t...so I’m still currently happy to cut/paste/analyse his posts as they have contained quite a number of obvious flaws.
How the hell can YOU possibly see 'self-deception' in SOMEONE ELSES post? That's got to be the most ridiculous thing I've ever read. Doesn't the word 'self' imply that which is personal? So how are YOU going to know when SOMEONE ELSE is deceiving their self?
Self deception is the belief that what you are saying is true, while some part of ‘you’ must also know it’s not true. In writing it is implied in tone and message.
So lets look at the post he wrote after you post :
I'm not interested in changing anybody's thinking. I'm not trying to convince anybody of anything, I'm extending an invitation. This is why I don't participate in the 'banter'.
He says he’s not interested in changing anybody’s thinking....but he’s extending an invitation. That invitation is obviously for what he ‘says’ to end up changing their thinking...though I'm guessing he would qualify that with ‘if they so choose to listen and understand’ (which wouldn't make a difference to the reason he posts - what he is interested in trying to do). As both sides can't be true at the same time, we are left with two possibilities. Now he can just be being deceptive if he doesn’t believe that claptrap himself and just wants others to believe it, or if he actually believed it when writing, then he was also being self-deceptive. Considering his ‘certitude’ and attitude in his writing (don't argue with me or I'll put you on ignore...I'm extending an invitation to you
), and the numerous other examples of similar writing, it’s fairly safe to assume he believes his own deceptions.