David you said:
“Because there is a relationship of adversity between the individual citizen and the fictional, imaginary creation, “government”, it will serve our purposes well in terms of preserving our personal liberty, to look upon our employee, government, as an object of contempt and loathing.”
Forgive me David but the above statement made no sense to me.
“fictional, imaginary creation”? “our purposes”? “our employee”; you mean the government is
OUR employee? You have got to be kidding! I have tried to talk to “that employee of mine” and they aren’t talking to me.
I am trying to get a question answered: Why any veteran should be homeless. Can you, living in the land of the free, answer that question?
David you say you are a trial attorney, huh! Retired? Public or private? State, federal, what? Defense or offense? A matter of laws? Whose laws? Like the one that created legalized abortions? Those people that created THAT LAW saying that was ok for it’s citizens to do?
Don’t kid yourself my friend; at that time the majority of citizens would have said “go to hell” if it were left of to them to ok that law.
Think of the word “government” itself. To rule, control, govern the lives of others as if they are all morons and can’t do anything themselves. What a crock if that is what government is. Perhaps we need a new word, say “GUIDEMENT”. Like, lead by example. Barney Frank, what an example, huh! Ted Kennedy and his insignificant incident at Chappaquiddick? My what discretion money will buy. It’s amazing what a group of attorneys can do when they put there heads together. Here, read this about one such attorney:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chappaquiddick_incident
Yes I know that will be difficult when morality is considered a “politically incorrect” word. A people who control a people who ignore any attempt to define morality must demand immorality from those very same people. Morality is nothing more than helping others more than you “help yourself”. Just how deep are those pockets when politicians do that. Help themselves. Pork barrel spending comes to mind. Damn !!!!
“Government Official”? Does that even sound like a title that an employee would use to it’s employer? Ha! Fat chance. Official what? Sycophant to power!?
Anytime money is involve in any transaction you will find “sticky fingers”. Ha! Big time, and big time government officials have the stickiest of all. Most of them are attorneys too. Imagine that. Check out there homes, their automobiles, their chauffeurs, limos, their individual carbon footprint. Now check out their employers’ same. LOL!!! What an hilarious joke.
Now when you think of freedom and any state think of one state and one union all being free to do what comes naturally to each and every one of them. No bureaucracy, no red tape, no confusion with no value on any rare commodity. Of course advertising entrapment would have to go too. Of course that would be an infringement of the first amendment, huh? What a paradox rich attorneys have created, damn! The more chaotic, the better. Those poor paralegals and what they have to do.
Just using as needed for every individual on this earth. Then you will be free my friend to do what you can do and not a pawn of power under the thumb of those who sequester themselves behind closed doors opening them to anyone who will “kiss their ass”.
Now please don’t come up with dramatic analogies such as depicted on television or any controlled media to prove your stance. Remember those are just programs and so dramatic to gather attention making mountains out of molehills. A ploy that has always be used by power to make the insignificant significant. Like it is every woman’s right to kill their unborn by feminist who would never get close enough to a man to get pregnant in the first place.
We are a long way from being free and yes a benevolent dictator is sorely needed. But instead, to be more useful, a benevolent guide would be better, who does carry a big stick; a big stick of wisdom and truth. Now I’d vote for that guy. In a heartbeat. He who speaks the truth needs no army to defend them.
William
