@William,
William wrote:
What I offer I know will not be understood by all.
Or, it's not intelligible.
William wrote:
That is not for me to assume what I offer is not understood by any.
The double negative here makes this illegible.
William wrote:
I know what I say has merit and there are those who understand.
A masturbatory declaration if there is to be one. If I don't accept what you say has merit, then bless my heart, try as I might, I must simply not understand what you "offer."
William wrote:
I have posted many times and perhaps if you perused some of my posts you might know me better. I will not address any subject anymore to only those who do not understand. It's a waste of time and energy.
Preaching to the choir about a hymnal titled "don't sing." This is your strong suit. Got it.
William wrote:
If we could contact each other privately or you were more specific, I might.
You're in a forum dude. It's a marketplace of ideas. Bad ones die, good ones live. Ante up if you want to play, but we play in public.
William wrote:
Perhaps if you researched what rape and rapture are, as to what is known in their various contexts, what I offer might be a little clearer to you and not so confusing.
In other words, rape and rapture, as you define them. You're trying to dictate the terms of discussion on a topic you started about their difference. You're appointing yourself the referee. It doesn't appear you're here to discuss as much as assert.
Assert all you like. It matters not.
R
T