@Sabz5150,
Sabz5150;68790 wrote:You still attempt to deflect with no real answer. You attempt to reframe this topic into something that you can copy-paste information to and from.
Not gonna happen.
In between all your spewing of typical conservative tripe, you have not ONCE attempted to answer the topic of this thread.
I have answered the thread topic; it is a pile of hyperbolic Librul bile plain and simple. Do I need to get out my crayons to make it more OBVIOUS?
Sabz5150;68790 wrote:This shows a SERIOUS lack of debate ability and strength... you wouldn't need to turn this into a typical who-spends-what spat if this weren't the case.
Sabz5150;68790 wrote:All you go on about is "our spending is okay because of 9/11" (by the by, the surplus was gone BEFORE 9/11 ever happened) and "they are spending out of control!" (although given the total costs of roughly 3.5 trillion dollars of the prev. administration, this admin hasn't even come close).
Your debate skills are hovering around your typical sixteen year old child that has found out how to twitblog the interscapes.
What irony, while going on a childish emotional whiney tirade, that you claim it would be others who are acting like children. I guess the FACTS are something you find distasteful. Based on your emotional babble and hyperbole that I see you post on this forum, I can say it is no surprise.
Sabz5150;68790 wrote:Again, evident from the fact that NOTHING you have posted has addressed the original topic and even more so from the fact that you flatly refuse to address the topic. Most of your "facts" are easily addressed (Where did you get 1.6 trillion? Could it be the cost of the healthcare bill? Funny that). On top of that, you use the 9/11 crutch... typical conservative.
Fascinating; one of the most devastating events since the attack on Pearl Harbor and you dismiss it as a mere crutch.
I cannot say that I am shocked by your attempts to trivialize those events to support the criminally negligent spending of the current administration and their lies and distortions to demagogue their political opponents for purely hyper partisan political purposes.
Sabz5150;68790 wrote:You want a spending spree debate? Find another thread... perhaps one where the topic is, I dunno, actually relevant to the thread. The ONLY person that brought this to the thread is YOU. YOU attempted to bring in topics you think you can actively debate, being unable to do anything with what the thread is actually about. YOU brought up the economy, YOU brought up 9/11, YOU brought up deficits and spending.
I am not on a spending debate; I staying am on the thread topic and illustrating how it farcically emotes the typical uninformed emotional pabulum of the Libruls in the Democrat Party in a vacuum of reality or the facts.
I use it to illustrate that your nonsensical emotional bile is merely an attempt to deflect from the REAL issues at hand and merely demagogue rather than be confused for intellectual debate.
How old are you? 20? Maybe you should read some history or economics 101 before you attempt to blather a forum with nonsense?
Sabz5150;68790 wrote:You say you can debate? You wouldn't botch it this badly if you could.
Try again, slick.
As evidenced above, the only thing you have is a propensity for whiney diatribes and uniformed rants that contain little in the way of facts that could not be mistaken for anything containing thoughtful intellect.
Now run along; I have no interest in more of your whiney nonsense.